We document a two-year transdisciplinary project on the transition management processes of regional clusters in textile, timber, and dairy industries in the Swiss canton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden. This canton is a rural prealpine area, which has been historically shaped by traditional industries and which lies in the vicinity of St Gallen in the Greater Zürich Area. Scientists and regional stakeholders collaboratively planned, assessed, and discussed how to realize cooperative business strategies in order to sustain a continued presence in their selected industry. 101 stakeholders participated in a project, which made use of the area development negotiations method. This systematic and analytical method involved (a) the construction of different regional business strategies and clustering variants through formative scenario analysis, (b) a multicriteria evaluation of these variants, and (c) a multi-stakeholder consensus process on different forms of horizontal and vertical cooperation. As a result, a regional learning process with the ultimate goal of moving towards a sustainable development form was initiated between industries, public authorities, and research institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmdamJ, 2003, “Structure and strategy for regional learning and innovation. Challenges for regional planning”European Planning Studies11(4) 439–459
2.
AminAThriftN, 1994Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
3.
ARE (Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung), 2003, “Agglomerationswachstum: Jede dritte Schweizer Gemeinde ist städtisch”Dossier. Fakten Hintergrundinformationen zur Raumentwicklung3(1)
4.
ArndtOSternbergR, 2000, “Do manufacturing firms profit from intraregional innovation linkages? An empirical answer”European Planning Studies8465–486
5.
AsheimB T, 1996, “Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity”European Planning Studies4379–401
6.
BatheltH, 2005, “Geographies of production: Growth regimes in spatial perspective (II)—knowledge creation and growth in clusters”Progress in Human Geography29204–216
7.
BenneworthPDansonMRainesPWhittamG, 2003, “Confusing clusters? Making sense of the cluster approach in theory and practice”European Planning Studies11512–520
8.
BfL, 2002Agrarbericht 2002 (Bundesamt für Bauten und Logistik, Bern)
BfS and BUWAL, 2001Wald und Holz—Jahrbuch 2001 (Bundesamt für Statistik, Neuchâtel)
11.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2001, “Participatory local governance and transport planning”Environment and Planning A33431–451
12.
BoschmaR A, 2005a, “Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges”Regional Studies3941–45
13.
BoschmaR A, 2005b, “Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment”Regional Studies3961–74
14.
CapelloRFaggianA, 2005, “Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes”Regional Studies3975–87
15.
ChapmanK, 2005, “From ‘growth centre’ to ‘cluster’: Restructuring, regional development, and the Teesside chemical industry”Environment and Planning A37597–615
16.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
FloridaR, 1995, “Toward the learning region”Futures27527–536
22.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
23.
ForesterJ, 1994, “Bridging interests and community: Advocacy planning and the challenges of deliberate democracy”Journal of the American Planning Association60153–159
JüttemannH, 1984Alte Bauernsägen im Schwarzwald und in den Alpenländern (G Braun, Karlsruhe)
33.
KeebleDTylerP, 1995, “Enterprising behaviour and the urban–rural shift”Urban Studies32975–997
34.
KochBRiederP, 2002, “Auswirkungen staatlicher Massnahmen auf die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Milchwirtschaft”, Institut für Agrarwirtschaft, ETH, Zürich
35.
LaveJWengerE, 1990Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
36.
LawsDScholzR WShiroyamaHSusskindLSuzukiTWeberO, 2004, “Expert views on sustainability and technology implementation”International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology11(3) 247–261
37.
LorenzenM, 2001, “Localized learning and policy: Academic advice on enhancing regional competitiveness through learning”European Planning Studies9163–185
38.
LoukopoulosPScholzR W, 2004, “Sustainable future urban mobility: Using ‘area development negotiations’ for scenario assessment and participatory strategic planning”Environment and Planning A362203–2226
39.
LundequistPPowerD, 2002, “Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden”European Planning Studies10686–704
40.
MalmbergAMaskellP, 2002, “The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”Environment and Planning A34429–449
41.
MartinRSunleyP, 2003, “Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?”Journal of Economic Geography35–35
42.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1999, “Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”Cambridge Journal of Economics23167–185
43.
MorganK, 1997, “The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal”Regional Studies31491–503
44.
MosimannE, 2002, “Editorial”Schweizer Holzbau113
45.
MoulaertFNussbaumerJ, 2005, “The social region: Beyond the territorial dynamics of the learning economy”European Urban and Regional Studies1245–64
46.
MoulaertFSekiaF, 2003, “Territorial innovation models: A critical survey”Regional Studies37289–302
47.
NewlandsD, 2003, “Competition and cooperation in industrial clusters: The implications for public policy”European Planning Studies11521–532
48.
OakeyR PCooperS Y, 1989, “High technology industry, agglomeration and the potential for peripherally sited small firms”Regional Studies23347–360
49.
PhelpsN, 2002, “A crisis in economic geography? On performing the diverse subdiscipline”Environment and Planning A34189–190
50.
PhelpsN AOzawaT, 2003, “Contrasts in agglomeration: Proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared”Progress in Human Geography27583–604
51.
PhelpsN AFallonR JWilliamsC L, 2001, “Small firms, borrowed size and the urban–rural shift”Regional Studies35613–624
52.
PorterM E, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (The Free Press, New York)
53.
RavetzJ, 2000City Region 2020: Integrated Planning for a Sustainable Environment (Earthscan, London)
54.
RotmansJKempRVan AsseltM B A, 2001, “More evolution then revolution: Transition management in public policy”Foresight—The Journal of Foresight Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy3(1) 15–32
SagerT, 1994Communicative Planning Theory (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
57.
SagerT, 2002, “Deliberative planning and decision making. An impossibility result”Journal of Planning Education and Research21367–378
58.
SchampE W, 2005, “Decline of the district, renewal of firms: An evolutionary approach to footwear production in the Pirmasens area, Germany”Environment and Planning A37617–634
59.
SchmithüsenFKaiserBSchmidhauserAMellinghoffSKammerhoferA W, 2003Unternehmerisches Handeln in der Wald- und Holzwirtschaft. Betriebswirtschaftliche Grundlagen und Managementprozesse (Deutscher Betriebswirte, Gernsbach)
ScholzR W, 2000, “Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity”, in Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-solving Among Science, Technology and Society. Proceedings of the International Transdisciplinarity 2000 Conference. Workbook II: Mutual Learning Sessions Eds ScholzR WHäberliRBillAWeltiM (Haffman, Zürich) pp 13–17
62.
ScholzR WKaufmannD, (Eds) 2003Zukunft der Schweizer Textilindustrie. Erkenntnisse einer Gesamtschweizerischen Analyse auf bauend auf den Ergebnissen der ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2002 ‘Appenzell Ausserrhoden—Umwelt Wirtschaft Region’Professur für Umweltnatur- und Umweltsozialwissenschaften der ETH Zürich, Zürich
63.
ScholzR WStauffacherM, 2002, “Unsere Landschaft ist unser Kapital: Überblick zur ETH-UNS Fallstudie ‘Landschaftsnutzung für die Zukunft: Der Fall Appenzell Ausserrhoden’”, in Landschaftsnutzung für die Zukunft: Der Fall Appenzell Ausserrhoden. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2001 Eds ScholzR WStauffacherMBöschSWiekA (Rüegger und Pabst, Zürich) pp 13–47
64.
ScholzR WStauffacherM, 2003, “Welche Chancen haben Traditionsbranchen in der ländlich geprägten Agglomeration? Ergebnisse der ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2002 ‘Umwelt–Wirtschaft–Region’ in Appenzell Ausserrhoden”, in Appenzell Ausserrhoden: Umwelt–Wirtschaft–Region. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2002 Eds ScholzR WStauffacherMBöschSKrütliP (Rüegger und Pabst, Zürich) pp 5–44
65.
ScholzR WTietjeO, 2002Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
ScholzR WLangDWiekAWalterAStauffacherM, 2006, “Transdisciplinary case studies as means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory”International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education7226–251
SmithR W, 1973, “A theoretical basis for participatory planning”Policy Sciences4275–295
71.
StauffacherMWalterALangDWiekAScholzR W, 2006, “Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach”International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education7252–275
72.
StorperM, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economics, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”European Urban and Regional Studies3191–221
73.
SturnD, 2000, “Decentralized industrial policies in practice: The case of Austria and Styria”European Planning Studies8(2) 169–182
74.
TannerA, 1982Spulen–Weben–Sticken, Die Industrialisierung in Appenzell Ausserrhoden (Juris Druck/Eigenverlag, Zürich)
75.
Thompson-KleinJGrossenbacher-MansuyWHäberliRBillAScholzR WWeltiM, (Eds) 2000Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-solving Among Science, Technology, and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity (Birkhaüser, Basel)
76.
TietjeO, 2005, “Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios”Journal of Operational Research162(2) 418–432
77.
TorreAGillyJ-P, 2000, “On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics”Regional Studies34169–180
Van AsseltTreuhandstelle M B ARijkens-KlompN, 2002, “A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective”Global Environmental Change12167–184
80.
VollenbroekF A, 2002, “Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation”Journal of Cleaner Production10215–223
81.
Weber-EggenbergerSKrütliP, 2003, “Milchwirtschaft im Appenzellerland”, in Appenzell Ausserrhoden: Umwelt–Wirtschaft–Region. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2002 Eds ScholzR WStauffacherMBöschSKrütliP (Rüegger und Pabst, Zürich) pp 163–228
82.
WengerE, 1998, “Communities of practice: Learning as a social system”The Systems Thinker9
83.
WiekABinderCScholzR W, 2006, “Functions of scenarios in transition processes”Futures38740–766
84.
WillsonR, 2003, “Planning theory in our own backyard: Communicative action in academic governance”Journal of Planning Education and Research22297–307
