Geographical information systems (GIS) are increasingly used in England and Wales as a tool to monitor crime and aid community-safety planning. This is despite the widely known limitations of police-recorded data on crime victimisation, and concerns about the quality and specificity of available data on fear of crime. Meanwhile, improving streetlighting is a popular strategy both for improving community safety and for reducing fear of crime. In this paper we report on research carried out in Northumberland, northeast England, which aimed to identify locations most in need of new streetlighting. First, GIS crime hotspot maps and lighting coverage maps were analysed to identify potential areas to target. Qualitative rapid appraisal techniques were then used in these areas to explore local residents' perceptions and understandings of the relationships between streetlighting, victimisation, and fear of crime. The qualitative data were used to interpret the hotspot maps further, and to inform the location and type of streetlighting interventions. The research demonstrates that people's experiences of crime and fear, and their understandings of the relationships these have to streetlighting, are complex and reflective. At most, streetlighting was held to have a marginal and even then contradictory influence on the problems of crime and fear that people face. The implications are considered. We conclude that qualifying the outputs of GIS mapping was essential in this case, and has wide potential in critical policy research to promote more inclusive knowledge and more effective decisionmaking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottJChambersRDunnCHarrisTMerodeEPorterGTownsendJWeinerD, 1998, “Participatory GIS: Opportunity or oxymoron?”PLA Notes3327–34
2.
AtkinsSHusainSStoreyA, 1991The Influence of Street Lighting on Crime and the Fear of Crime Crime Prevention Unit Paper 29, Home Office, London
BallentyneSFraserP, 1998, “It's good to talk, but its not good enough: Active consultation as a key to safer communities”, in Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety Eds BallentyneSPeaseKMcLarenV, Institute for Public Policy Research, 30–32Southampton Street, London WC2E 7RA, pp 164–188
5.
BrownS, 1995, “Crime and safety in whose ‘community’? Age, everyday life, and problems for youth policy”Youth and Policy4827–48
6.
ChaineySRatcliffeJ, 2005GIS and Crime Mapping (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
7.
ChaineySReidSStuartN, 2002, “When is a hotspot a hotspot? A procedure for creating statistically robust hotspot maps of crime”, in Innovations in GIS 9 Eds KidnerDHiggsGWhiteS (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 21–36
ClarkeR V (Ed.), 1992Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (Harrow and Heston, New York)
10.
CraigWJHarrisTMWeinerD, 2002Community Participation and GIS (Taylor and Francis, London)
11.
Crime and Disorder Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 37 (The Stationery Office, London)
12.
CurryMR, 1998Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies (Routledge, London)
13.
DorlingDFairbairnD, 1997Mapping: Ways of Representing the World (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
14.
FarrallS, 2004, “Revisiting crime surveys: Emotional responses without emotions?”International Journal of Social Research Methodology7(2) 157–171
15.
FarrallSBannisterJDittonJGilchristE, 1997, “Questioning the measurement of the ‘fear of crime’: Findings from a major methodological study”British Journal of Criminology37658–679
16.
FarringtonDPWelshBC, 2002Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime: A Systematic Review Home Office Research Study 251, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office, London
HoughM, 1995Anxiety About Crime: Findings from the 1994 British Crime Survey Research Findings number 25, Home Office Research and Statistics Department, Home Office, London
24.
KesbyMKindonSPainR, 2005, “Participatory approaches and diagramming techniques”, in Methods in Human Geography Eds FlowerdewRMartinM (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex) pp 144–166
25.
KitchinRMHubbardPJ, 1999, “Editorial: Research action and ‘critical’ geographies”Area31195–198
26.
KoskelaH, 1997, “‘Bold walk and breakings’, women's spatial confidence versus fear of violence”Gender, Place and Culture4301–319
27.
KoskelaHPainR, 2000, “Revisiting fear and place: Women's fear of attack and the built environment”Geoforum31269–280
28.
KwanMP, 2002, “Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s”Gender, Place and Culture9271–279
29.
LevineN, 1999Crimestat: A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations (National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC)
30.
LoaderIGirlingESparksR, 1998, “Narratives of decline: Youth, dis/order and community in an English ‘Middletown’”British Journal of Criminology38388–403
31.
MacFarlaneRTurnerKPainRGillS, 2001Streetlighting, Crime Patterns and Fear of Crime Analysis Centre for Environmental and Spatial Analysis, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne
MatthewsHLimbMTaylorM, 2000, “The ‘street as thirdspace’”, in Children's Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning Eds HollowaySLValentineG (Routledge, London) pp 63–79
34.
MasonD, 2000Building Safer Communities for Children: A Child-focused Analysis of the First Crime and Disorder Strategies 1999–2002National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 42 Curtain Road, London EC2A 3NH
35.
Mirrlees-BlackCAllenJ, 1998Concern About Crime: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey Research Findings number 83, Research Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office, London
NairGDittonJPhillipsS, 1993, “Environmental improvements and the fear of crime”British Journal of Criminology33555–561
38.
NewburnTJonesT, 2001Consultation by Crime and Disorder PartnershipsHome Office, London
39.
OcTTiesdellS, 1997Safer City Centres: Reviving the Public Realm (Paul Chapman, London)
40.
PainR, 2000, “Place, social relations and the fear of crime: A review”Progress in Human Geography24365–388
41.
PainR, 2006, “Social geography: Seven deadly myths in policy research”Progress in Human Geography30250–259
42.
PainRTownshendT, 2002, “A safer city centre for all? Meanings of ‘community safety’ in Newcastle upon Tyne”Geoforum33105–119
43.
PainterK, 1991, “Streetlighting and crime: A response to recent Home Office research”The Lighting Journal58229–231
44.
PainterK, 1992, “Different worlds: The spatial, temporal and social dimensions of female victimisation” in Crime, Policing and Place Eds EvansDJFyfeNRHerbertD T (Routledge, London) pp 164–195
45.
PainterK, 1996, “The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark”Landscape and Urban Planning35193–201
46.
PainterKAFarringtonD, 2001, “Evaluating situational crime prevention using a young people's survey”British Journal of Criminology41266–284
47.
PeaseK, 1999Lighting and Crime (Institution of Lighting Engineers, Regent House, Regent Place, Rugby, Warwicks CV21 2PN
48.
PicklesJ, 1995Ground Truth (Guilford Press, New York)
49.
RamseyMNewtonR, 1991The Effect of Better Street Lighting on Crime and Fear: A Review Crime Prevention Unit Paper number 29, Home Office, London
50.
SchuurmanN, 2002, “Reconciling social constructivism and realism in GIS”ACME173–90
51.
SimmondsJDoddT, 2003Crime in England and Wales 2002/3Home Office, London
52.
SmithS, 2001, “Doing qualitative research: From interpretation to action”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 23–40
53.
StankoEA, 1987, “Typical violence, normal precaution: Men, women and interpersonal violence in England, Wales, Scotland and the USA”, in Women, Violence and Social Control Eds HanmerJMaynardM (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 122–134
54.
TienJMO'DonnellVFBarnettAMirchandaniPB, 1978Street Lighting ProjectsNational Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC
55.
TownshendT, 1997, “Safer city centres: The role of public lighting”, in Safer City Centres: Reviving the Public Realm Eds OcTTiesdellS (Paul Chapman, London)
56.
VrijAWinkelFW, 1991, “Characteristics of the built environment and fear of crime: A research note on interventions in unsafe locations”Deviant Behaviour12203–215
57.
WalklateS, 1989Victimology (Unwin Hyman, London)
58.
WilliamsCDunnC, 2003, “GIS in participatory research: Assessing the impact of landmines on communities in north-west Cambodia”Transactions in GIS7393–410
