If gentrification is now global, I investigate the degree to which it is possible to argue that it involves a global gentrifier class. This is examined in a number of dimensions: occupational characteristics; the mix of economic and cultural capital; ideas of cosmopolitan knowledge; gentrification aesthetics and the use of urban space. I argue that, whilst a new middle class is reproduced in certain global cities, the diversity of aesthetic trajectories and the localisms of cosmopolitan knowledge suggest that the case for a global gentrifier class or urban new middle class is a weak one. Much more pervasive at a global scale is a conventional set of strategies of middle-class reproduction in preserving social distinction that now occurs in urban as well as suburban contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonRBridgeG (Eds), 2005Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism (Routledge, London)
2.
BeaverstockJ, 2002, “Transnational elites in global cities: British expatriates in Singapore's financial district”Geoforum33525–538
3.
BeaverstockJ, 2004, “Managing across borders: Transnational knowledge management and expatriation in legal firms”Journal of Economic Geography42157–179
4.
BeaverstockJ, 2005, “Transnational managerial elites in the city: British highly-skilled intercompany transferees in New York City's financial district”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31245–268
5.
BourdieuP, 1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
6.
BourdieuP, 1986, “The forms of capital”, in Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education Ed. RichardsonJ (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT) pp 241–258
7.
BridgeG, 2001a, “Estate agents as interpreters of economic and cultural capital: The gentrification premium in the Sydney housing market”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2587–101
8.
BridgeG, 2001b, “Bourdieu, rational action and the time–space strategy of gentrification”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26205–216
9.
BridgeG, 2003, “Time–space trajectories in provincial gentrification”Urban Studies402545–2556
10.
BridgeG, 2005a, “The paradox of cosmopolitan urbanism: Rationality, difference and the circuits of cultural capital”, in Cosmopolitan Urbanism Eds BinnieJHollowayJMillingtonSYoungC (Sage, London) pp 53–69
11.
BridgeG, 2005bReason in the City of Difference: Pragmatism, Communicative Action and Contemporary Urbanism (Routledge, London)
12.
BridgeG, 2006, “It's not just a question of taste: Gentrification, the neighbourhood and cultural capital”Environment and Planning A381965–1978
13.
ButlerT, 1997Gentrification and the Middle Classes (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
14.
ButlerTRobsonG, 2001, “Social capital, gentrification, and neighbourhood change in London: A comparison of three south London neighbourhoods”Urban Studies382145–2162
15.
ButlerTRobsonG, 2003London Calling (Berg, Oxford)
16.
CaulfieldJ, 1994City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto's Gentrification and Critical Social Practice (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
17.
ClarkE, 2005, “The order and simplicity of gentrification—a political challenge”, in Gentrification in a Global Context Eds AtkinsonRBridgeG (Routledge, London) pp 256–264
18.
ConleyVA, 2002, “Chaosmopolis”Theory, Culture and Society19127–138
19.
DharwadkerV, 2001Cosmopolitan Geographies: New Locations in Literature and Culture (Routledge, London)
20.
EhrenreichBEhrenreichS, 1979, “The professional–managerial class”, in Between Capital and Labour Ed. WalkerP (Harvester Press, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 55–75
21.
GoldthorpeJH, 1982, “On the service class, its formation and future” in Social Class and the Division of Labour Eds GiddensAMackenzieG (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 47–64
22.
GouldnerA, 1979The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class: A Frame of Reference, Theses, Conjectures, Argumentation and a Historical Perspective (Macmillan, London)
23.
HageG, 1997, “At home in the entrails of the west”, in Home/World: Space, Community and Marginality in Sydney's West Eds GraceHHageGJohnsonLLangsworthJSymondsM (Pluto Press, Annandale, Queensland) pp 99–153
24.
HamnettC, 1994, “Socio economic change in London: Professionalisation not polarisation”Built Environment20192–203
25.
HannerzU, 1990, “Cosmopolitans and locals in a world culture”Theory, Culture and Society7 (2–3) 237–251
IsinE (Ed.), 2000Democracy, Citizenship and the Global Economy (Routledge, London)
28.
JagerM, 1986, “Class definition and the aesthetics of gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne”, in Gentrification of the City Eds SmithNWilliamsP (Allen and Unwin, Sydney) pp 78–91
29.
LeesL, 2003, “Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City”Urban Studies402487–2510
30.
LeyD, 1996The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
31.
LeyD, 2003, “Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification”Urban Studies402527–2544
32.
LeyD, 2004, “Transnational spaces and everyday lives”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers: New Series29151–164
33.
MayJ, 1996, “A little taste of something more exotic: The imaginative geographies of everyday life”Geography8157–64
34.
PodmoreJ, 1998, “(Re)Reading the ‘loft living’ habitus in Montreal's inner city”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research22283–301
35.
RabanJ, 1984Soft City (Fontana, London)
36.
RobertsonR, 1995, “Glocalisation: Time–space and homogeneity and heterogeneity”, in Global Modernities Eds FeatherstoneMLashSRobertsonR (Sage, London) pp 25–44
37.
RofeM, 2000, “Gentrification within Australia's ‘problem city’: Inner Newcastle as a zone of residential transition”Australian Geographical Studies3854–70
38.
RofeM, 2003, “‘I want to be global’: Theorising the gentrifying class as an emergent elite global community”Urban Studies402511–2526
39.
RoseD, 1984, “Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of marxist urban theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space247–74
40.
SassenS, 2000The Global City: New York, London and Tokyoupdated edition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
41.
ShawW, 2005, “Heritage and gentrification: Remembering ‘The Good Old Days’ in postcolonial Sydney”, in Gentrification in a Global Context Eds AtkinsonRBridgeG (Routledge, London) pp 57–71
42.
SklairL, 2001The Transnational Capitalist Class (Blackwell, Oxford)
43.
SmithN, 1996The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (Routledge, London)
44.
SmithN, 2002, “New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as a global urban strategy”Antipode34428–450
45.
StreetE, 2005, “The Tabacco Factory: A study of capital (dis)investment(s), public policy and neighbourhood gentrification in ‘Westville’, Bristol”, unpublished MSc dissertation, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol
46.
SwyngedouwE, 2004, “Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling”Cambridge Review of International Affairs1725–48
47.
WalkerP (Ed.) 1979Between Capital and Labour (Harvester Press, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
48.
WrightEO, 1985Classes (Verso, London)
49.
ZukinS, 1982Loft Living: Culture and capital in urban change (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
50.
ZukinS, 1995The Cultures of Cities (Blackwell, Oxford)
