In this paper I examine pedestrian-motor-vehicle conflicts in US cities as competing forms of rationality based in particular values, techniques, and material forms. The kernel of dispute is the transportation engineer's focus on ‘traffic flow’ in allowing motor vehicles to move as efficiently as possible versus the pedestrian advocate's desire for ‘place’ as the intimate context of urban life. I consider the City of Oakland's Pedestrian Master Plan as a challenge to the mandate for traffic flow operationalized by the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual. These values and techniques shape intersections, pedestrian crossings, street corners, and other taken-for-granted material forms in the urban built environment. Within the constraints of shared right-of-way, these competing rationalities are negotiated through spatial and temporal strategies that, historically, have resulted in the hierarchical ordering of the automobile over pedestrians in the US city. However, a growing emphasis on walking, bicycling, and public-transit-riding is reshaping the predominant values, techniques, and material forms to facilitate street design for multiple transportation modes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleyardD, 1981Livable Streets (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
2.
BarrettPRoseM H, 1999, “Street smarts: The politics of transportation statistics in the American city, 1900–1990”Journal of Urban History25405–433.
3.
BeckmannJ, 2001, “Automobility—a social problem and theoretical concept”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19593–607.
4.
BeckmannJ, 2004, “Mobility and safety”Theory, Culture, and Society21(4/5) 81–100.
5.
BrodslyD, 1981LA Freeway: An Appreciative Essay (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
6.
BrubakerR, 1984The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber (Allen and Unwin, London).
7.
BullardR DJohnsonG S (Eds), 1997Just Transportation: Dismantling Race and Class Barriers to Mobility (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC).
DemerathLLevingerD, 2003, “The social qualities of being on foot: A theoretical analysis of pedestrian activity, community, and culture”City and Community2217–237.
11.
DittmarH, 1996, “Thinking like a system: Sustainability through transportation technology”ITS Quarterly Winter 19–26.
12.
EspelandW N, 1998The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL).
13.
EwingR, 1999Traffic Calming: State of the PracticeFederal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
14.
FeatherstoneM, 2004, “Automobilities: An introduction”Theory, Culture, and Society21(4/5) 1–24.
15.
Federal Highway Administration, 2002aPedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and MobilityUS Department of Transportation, McLean, VA.
16.
Federal Highway Administration, 2002bSafety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Executive Summary and Recommended GuidelinesUS Department of Transportation, McLean, VA.
17.
FishmanR, 1987Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia (Basic Books, New York).
18.
FlinkJ, 1975The Car Culture (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
19.
FosterM, 1981From Streetcar to Superhighway: American City Planners and Urban Transportation, 1900–1940 (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
HansonS, 2000, “Transportation: Hooked on speed, eyeing sustainability”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds SheppardEBarnesT J (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 468–483.
22.
JacksonK T, 1985Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (Oxford University Press, New York).
23.
JacobsJ, 1961The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Vintage Books, New York).
24.
JonesD W, 1989California's Freeway Era in Historical Perspective report UCB-ITS-RR-89-16, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
25.
KriegerALennertzW (Eds), 1991Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and Town-making Principles (Rizzoli, New York).
26.
KrotoszynskiR JJr, 1995, “Celebrating Selma: The importance of context in public forum analysis”Yale Law Journal1041411–1440.
27.
LaurierE, 2004, “Doing officework on the motorway”Theory, Culture, and Society21(4/5) 261–277.
28.
LeafW APreusserD F, 1999Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian InjuriesNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
29.
LevingerD, 2002Pedestrian Technologies: Redesigning Citizens, Organizers and Technical Professionals unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
30.
LewisT, 1997Divided Highways: Building the Interstate Highways, Transforming American Life (Penguin Books, New York).
31.
LuptonD, 1999, “Monsters in metal cocoons: ‘road rage’ and cyborg bodies”Body and Society5(1) 57–72.
32.
McShaneC, 1994Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City (Columbia University Press, New York).
33.
MoudonA V (Ed.), 1987Public Streets for Public Use (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York).
34.
PattonJ W, 2004aTransportation Worlds: Designing Infrastructures and Forms of Urban Life unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Renseelaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
35.
PattonJ W, 2004b, “Multiple worlds on Oakland's streets: Social practice and the built environment”Visual Anthropology Review20(2) 36–56.
36.
PhillipsR GGuttenplanM, 2003, “A review of approaches for assessing multimodal quality of service”Journal of Public Transportation6(4) 69–87.
37.
PorterT M, 1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
38.
RaeD W, 2001, “Viacratic America: Plessy on foot v. Brown on wheels”Annual Review of Political Science4417–438.
39.
ShellerMUrryJ, 2000, “The city and the car”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24737–757.
40.
SouthworthMOwensP M, 1993, “The evolving metropolis: Studies of community, neighborhood, and street form at the urban edge”Journal of the American Planning Association59271–287.
41.
Surface Transportation Policy Project, 2002Ten Years of Progress: Building Better Communities through TransportationSurface Transportation Policy Project, Washington, DC.
42.
Surface Transportation Policy Project, 2004Mean Streets 2004: How Far Have We Come?Surface Transportation Policy Project, Washington, DC.
43.
ThriftN, 2004, “Driving in the city”Theory, Culture, and Society21(4/5) 41–59.
44.
TRB, 2000Highway Capacity ManualTransportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
45.
UrryJ, 2004, “The ‘system’ of automobility”Theory, Culture, and Society21(4/5) 25–39.
46.
VandersliceE, 2001, “Why did the pedestrian cross the road?”, America Walks, Portland, OR.
47.
VoltiR, 1996, “A century of automobility”Technology and Culture37663–685.
