It has recently come into question whether the term ‘gentrification’ can capture the wide array of contemporary demographic processes in the inner city. There is also a need to extend the gentrification debate beyond the Anglo-American context, while understanding the urban implications of contemporary demographic processes. In response to such challenges we examine the changing population geographies of the city of Bologna, with the aim of establishing, whether the concept of ‘reurbanisation’ can provide a more useful encapsulation of its recent sociospatial transformations. Upon investigating the spatial patterns and movements of relevant population structures at various scales within the city, we have found that Bologna is the site of multifaceted and multidirectional demographic trends. In their entirety, these dynamics are leading to the social diversification, ‘residentialisation’, and fragmentation of the urban fabric. Such processes cannot be subsumed under the notion of gentrification because they do not involve major housing renovation and are spread throughout the inner city in a diffused and fragmented manner. ‘Reurbanisation’ is a more appropriate term to describe them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbedaRWithornA (Eds), 2002Lost Ground: Welfare Reform, Poverty and Beyond (South End Press, Boston, MA)
2.
AtkinsonR, 2000, “The hidden costs of gentrification: Displacement in central London”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment15307–326
3.
AtkinsonRBridgeG (Eds), 2005Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism (Routledge, London)
4.
BalmerC, 2005, “Leftist Italian icon gets tough with immigrants”Dawn 18 November
5.
Bessy-PietriP, 2000, “Les formes récentes de la croissance urbaine” [Contemporary forms of urban growth] Economie et Statistique33636–52
6.
BondiL, 1991, “Gender divisions and gentrification: A critique”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series16190–198
7.
BondiL, 1999, “Gender, class, and gentrification: Enriching the debate”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17261–282
8.
BongaartsJ, 2002, “The end of the fertility transition in the developed world”Population and Development Review28419–443
9.
BonifaziCHeinsF, 2000, “Long-term trends of internal migration in Italy”International Journal of Population Geography6111–131
10.
BonifaziCHeinsF, 2003, “Testing the differential urbanisation model for Italy”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9423–37
11.
BrandoliniACipolloneP, 2003, “Urban poverty in developed countries”Research on Economic Inequality9309–423
12.
ButlerT, 1997Gentrification and the Middle Classes (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
13.
ButlerTRobsonG, 2001, “Social capital, gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: A comparison of three south London neighbourhoods”Urban Studies382145–2162
14.
ButlerTRobsonG, 2003, “Plotting the middle-classes: Gentrification and circuits of education in London”Housing Studies185–28
15.
BuzarSOgdenPHallR, 2005a, “Households matter: The quiet demography of urban transformation”Progress in Human Geography294413–436
16.
BuzarSOgdenPHallRHaaseAKibischSSteinführerA, 2005b, “Splintering urban populations: Emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four European cities”, unpublished manuscript, available from the authors
17.
CampusDPasquinoG, 2000, “How to lose a mayor: The case of Bologna”Journal of Modern Italian Studies522–35
18.
CaponioT, 2005, “Policy networks and immigrants' association in Italy: The case of Milan, Bologna and Naples”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31931–950
19.
CaselliGCerbaraLHensFLipsiRM, 2003, “What impact do contextual variables have on the changing geography of mortality in Italy?”European Journal of Population19329–373
20.
CaulfieldJ, 1989, “Gentrification and desire”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology26617–632
21.
ChampionAG, 2001, “A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations”Urban Studies38657–677
22.
CialdiniFPaliniP, 1978I Centri Storici; Political Urbanistica e Programmi di Intervento Pubblico: Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Como, Gubbio, Pesaro, Vincenza [Historic city centres: Urban plans and projects for public development (Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Como, Gubbio, Pesaro, Vincenza)] (Mazzotta, Milan)
23.
di ComuneBologna, 2003Scenari Demografici Nell'area Bolognese 2003–2018 [Demographic scenarios for Bologna] (Comune di Bologna, Bologna)
24.
di ComuneBologna, 2005Relazione Previsionale e Programmatica 2005–2007 [Planning report 2005–2007] (Comune di Bologna, Bologna)
25.
CookeP, 1996, “Building a twenty-first century regional economy in Emilia-Romagna”European Planning Studies4153–62
26.
Council of Europe, 2004Recent Demographic Developments in Europe (Council of Europe, Strasbourg)
27.
DavidsonMLeesL, 2005, “New-build ‘gentrification’ and London's riverside renaissance”Environment and Planning A371165–1190
28.
DebenLMusterdSvan WeesepJ, 1992, “Urban revitalization and the revival of urban culture”Built Environment1884–89
29.
DelphyCLeonardD, 1992, “Familiar exploitation: A new analysis of marriage of contemporary society”, Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA
30.
DematteisGPetsimerisP, 1987, “Italy: Counterurbanization as a transitional phase in settlement reorganization”, in Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration Ed. ChampionAG (Edward Arnold, Sevenoaks, Kent) pp 187–206
31.
ErmischJ, 1991, “An ageing population, household formation and housing”Housing Studies6230–239
FerrecchiPFiniGGarziloC, 2002, “The management of environmental services in the City of Bologna”International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development142–58
34.
FishmanR, 2000, “The American metropolis and century's end: Past and future influences”Housing Policy Debate11199–213
35.
FloridaR, 2002The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life (Basic Book, New York)
36.
FreyWHKobrinFE, 1982, “Changing families and changing mobility: Their impact on the central city”Demography19261–277
37.
FriedlanderDOkunBSSegalL, 1999, “The demographic transition then and now: Processes, perspectives and analyses”Journal of Family History24493–533
38.
GigioliPP, 2001, “‘Criminali o discriminati’: Crime, immigrants, police”Journal of Modern Italian Studies6270–275
39.
GlassR, 1964, “Aspects of change”, in London: Aspects of Change Ed. GlassR (Centre for Urban Studies, London)
40.
GoberP, 1990, “The urban demographic landscape: Geographic perspective”, in Housing Demography: Linking Demographic Structure and Housing Markets Ed. MyersD (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 232–248
GriffithsR, 1995, “Cultural strategies and new modes of urban intervention”Cities12253–265
45.
HaaseAKabischSSteinführerA, 2005a, “Reurbanisation of inner-city areas in European cities. Scrutinizing a concept of urban development with reference to demographic and household change”, in Society, Economy, Environment—Towards the Sustainable City Eds SaganISmithD (Bogucki Wydawnyctwo Naukowe, Gdansk) pp 75–92
46.
HaaseAKabischSSteinführerABuzarSHallROgdenPE, 2005bReurbanising the Inner City: Demographic and Social Future of the ‘Re Urban Mobil’ Case Study AreasCentre for Environmental Research, Leipzig-Halle, Leipzig
47.
HallR, 1986, “Household trends within Western Europe 1970–1980”, in West European Population Change Eds FindlayAWhiteP (Croom Helm, London) pp 18–34
48.
HamnettCR, 1991, “The blind men and the elephant: The explanation of gentrification”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series16173–189
49.
HamnettCR, 1996, “Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes”Urban Studies331407–1430
50.
HamnettCR, 2003, “Gentrification and the middle class remaking of inner London”Urban Studies402401–2426
51.
InglehartR, 1997Modernisation and Postmodernisation: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
52.
JaggiMMüllerRSchmidS, 1977Red Bologna (Writers and Readers Publishing Corporative, London)
53.
JobseRMusterdS, 1993, “Population change in residential environments in the metropolitan areas of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and the Hague”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie84304–311
54.
JouveBLefèvreC, 1997, “When territorial political culture makes urban institution: The ‘metropolitan city’ of Bologna”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy189–111
55.
KarstenL, 2003, “Family gentrifiers: Challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children”Urban Studies402573–2585
56.
KlaassenLBourdrezJAVolmullerJ, 1981Transport and Reurbanisation (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
57.
KobrinFE, 1976, “The fall in household size and the rise of the primary individual in the United States”Demography13127–138
58.
KujathHJ, 1988, “Reurbanisierung?—Zur Organisation von Wohnen und Leben am Ende des Staedtischen Wachstums” [Reurbanisation? The organisation of housing and everyday life at the end of the era of urban expansion] Leviathan1523–43
59.
LambertCBuddyM, 2002, “Transforming the city: Post-recession gentrification and re-urbanisation”, paper presented at the Upward Neighbourhood Trajectories conference, University of Glasgow, http://www.bris.ac.uk/sps/cnrpaperspdf/cnr6pap.pdf
60.
LauriaMKnoppL, 1985, “Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance”Urban Geography6152–169
61.
LawCM, 1988The Uncertain Future of the Urban Core (Routledge, London)
62.
LeesL, 1994, “Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the positions of economics or culture”Progress in Human Geography18137–150
63.
LeesL, 2000, “A re-appraisal of gentrification: Towards a ‘geography of gentrification’”Progress in Human Geography24389–408
64.
LeontidouL, 1990The Mediterranean City in Transition, Social Change, and Urban Development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
65.
LesthaegheR, 1995, “The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation”, in Gender and Family Change in Industrialised Countries Eds MasonKOJensenAM (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 17–62
66.
LeverWF, 1993, “Reurbanisation: The policy implications”Urban Studies30267–284
67.
LewisJ, 2001The End of Marriage: Individualism and Intimate Relations (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
68.
LeyD, 1986, “Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment”Annals of the Association of American Geographers76521–535
69.
LeyD, 1996The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
70.
LeyD, 2003, “Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification”Urban Studies402527–2544
71.
LyonsM, 1996, “Gentrification, socioeconomic change, and the geography of displacement”Journal of Urban Affairs1839–62
72.
MadanipourACarsGAllenJ (Eds), 1998Social Exclusion in European Cities (Routledge, London)
73.
MilesSPaddisonR, 2005, “Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration”Urban Studies42833–839
74.
MingioneE, 1996, “Urban poverty in the advanced industrial world: Concepts, analysis and debates”, in Urban Poverty and the Underclass Ed. MingioneE (Blackwell, Oxford)
75.
MingioneE, 1998, “Fragmentation et exclusion: La question sociale dans la phase actuelle de transition des villes dans les sociétés industrielles advancées” [Fragmentation and exclusion: The social question in the current phase of urban transition in advanced industrial societies] Sociologie et Sociétés301–15
76.
MooreEGClarkWAV, 1990, “Housing and households in American cities: Structure and change in population mobility, 1974–1982”, in Housing Demography: Linking Demographic Structure and Housing Markets Ed. MyersD (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 203–231
Municipality of Bologna, 2004Results from the WP2 Questionnaire SurveyMunicipality of Bologna, Bologna
79.
MyersD, 1990, “Introduction: The emerging concept of housing demography”, in Housing Demography: Linking Demographic Structure and Housing Markets Ed. MyersD (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 3–34
80.
OgdenPEHallR, 2000, “Households, reurbanisation and the rise of living alone in the principal French cities 1975–1990”Urban Studies37367–390
81.
OgdenPEHallR, 2004, “The second demographic transition, new household forms and the urban population of France during the 1990s”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2988–105
82.
OgdenPESchnoebelenF, 2005, “The rise of the small household: Demographic change and household structure in Paris”Population, Space and Place11251–268
83.
ParisC, 1995, “Demographic aspects of social change: Implications for strategic housing policy”Urban Studies321623–1643
84.
PetsimerisP, 1991The Social Transformations of Urban Space (Patron, Bologna)
85.
PetsimerisP, 1998, “Urban decline and the new social and ethnic divisions in the core cities of the Italian industrial triangle”Urban Studies35449–465
86.
PetsimerisP, 2002, “Counter-urbanization in Italy”, in The International Handbook of Urban Systems Ed. GeyerHE (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 215–240
87.
PetsimerisP, 2005, “Out of squalor and towards another urban renaissance? Gentrification and neighbourhood transformations in Southern Europe”, in Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism Eds AtkinsonRBridgeG (Routledge, London) pp 240–255
88.
PeròD, 2005, “Left-wing politics, civil society and immigration in Italy: The case of Bologna”Ethnic and Racial Studies28832–858
89.
PivoG, 1990, “The net of mixed beads: Suburban office development in six regions”Journal of the American Planning Association56457–469
90.
di ProvinciaBologna, 2003Dossier Immigratie e Associazionismo [File on immigrants and NGOs] (Osservatorio per l'Immigrazione, Provincia di Bologna, Bologna)
91.
RedfernP, 1997, “A new look at gentrification: 1. Gentrification and domestic technologies”Environment and Planning A291275–1296
92.
SeoJK, 2002, “Re-urbanisation in regenerated areas of Manchester and Glasgow: New residents and the problems of sustainability”Cities19113–121
93.
SlaterT, 2002, “Looking at the ‘North American city’ through the lens of gentrification discourse”Urban Geography23131–153
94.
SlaterTCurranWLeesL, 2004, “Gentrification research: New directions and critical scholarship”Environment and Planning A361141–1150
95.
SmithD, 2005, “‘Studentification’: The gentrification factory?”, in Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism Eds AtkinsonRBridgeG (Routledge, London) pp 72–89
96.
SmithN, 1996The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (Routledge, London)
97.
SojaEW, 2001, “Exploring the postmetropolis”, in Postmodern Geography: Theory and Praxis Ed. MincaC (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 37–56
98.
StadtLeipzig, 2005Re Urban Mobil: Mobilising Reurbanisation on Condition of Demographic ChangeStadt Leipzig, Leipzig
99.
TallonARBromleyRDF, 2004, “Exploring the attractions of city centre living: The evidence and policy implications in British citiesGeoforum35771–787
100.
TaylorM, 1992, “Can you go home again? Black gentrification and the dilemma of difference”Berkeley Journal of Sociology37121–138
101.
TsoulouvisL, 1998, “Planning, the urban system and new forms of inequality in Greek cities”Progress in Planning501–74
102.
ValentineG, 1995, “Out and about: Geographies of lesbian landscapes”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1996–111
103.
Van de KaaDJ, 2001, “Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior”Population and Development Review27290–331
104.
van den BergL, 1982Urban Europe volume 1 (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
105.
van den BergLDrewettRKlaassenLHRossiAVijberbergCHT, 1982Urban Europe: A Study of Growth and Decline (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
106.
WardeA, 1991, “Gentrification as consumption: Issues of class and gender”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9223–232
107.
WarnesAM, 1994, “Cities and elderly people: Recent population and distributional trends”Urban Studies31799–816
108.
WattersI, 2004Urban Tribes: Are Friends the New Family? (Bloomsbury, London)
109.
WylyEKHammelDJ, 2004, “Gentrification, segregation, and discrimination in the American urban system”Environment and Planning A361215–1241
110.
ZhengW, 2000Cohabitation: An Alternative Form of Family Living (Oxford University Press, Toronto)
111.
ZimermannRESociAColacchioG, 2001, “Reconstructing Bologna: The city as an emergent computational system—a study in the complexity of urban structures”, http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0109025
