Electoral turnout is an important measure of the health of a liberal democracy. Although research identifies factors that affect electoral participation, we still know little about how electors in a specific location respond to opportunities to vote for different kinds of local, national, and supranational institutions. This paper addresses this issue by analysing the relative rates of turnout at local, parliamentary, and European elections within three time periods for the London Borough of Brent. It uses turnout data for individual polling districts to investigate whether relative differences in turnout are sustained across time, whether polling districts perform consistently or not for different types of elections and whether variations in turnout are related to marginality. The results indicate that turnout at different types of elections is not stable even within tightly constrained time periods and that there are statistically significant differences in the relative rates of participation between polling districts. Geographically, the differences in relative rates of turnout appear to be spatially clustered, particularly with respect to local elections and this may reflect an increase in the concentration of party campaigning in marginal wards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnselinL, 1995, “Local indicators of spatial association—LISA”Geographical Analysis2793–116
2.
BlaisA, 2000To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA)
3.
BlaisACartyR K, 1990, “Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?”European Journal of Political Research 18 March, 167–181
4.
BlaisAGidengilENevitteN, 2004, “Where does turnout decline come from?”European Journal of Political Research43221–236
5.
BlondelJSvennssonPSinnottR, 1998People and Parliament in the European Union: Democracy, Participation and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
6.
BullenNJonesKDuncanC, 1997, “Modelling complexity: Analyzing between-individual and between-place variation—a multilevel tutorial”Environment and Planning A29585–609
7.
ButlerDWestlakeM (Eds), 2000British Politics and European Elections 1999 (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
8.
ButlerDWestlakeM (Eds), 2005British Politics and European Elections 2004 (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
9.
ClarkeHSandersDStewartMWhiteleyP, 2004Political Choice in Britain (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
10.
CliffA DOrdJ K, 1981Spatial Processes: Models and Applications (Pion, London)
11.
CurticeJ, 1989, “The 1989 European election—protest or green tide”Electoral Studies8217–230
12.
CurticeJ, 2005, “Turnout: Electors stay home—again”, in Britain Votes 2005 Eds NorrisPWlezienC (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 120–129
13.
CurticeJSeydBThomsonK, 2001Devolution to the Centre: Lessons from London's First Mayoral Election WP 90, Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, and National Centre for Social Research, London
14.
DenverDHandsG, 1997, “Challengers, incumbents and the impact of constituency campaigning in Britain”Electoral Studies16175–194
15.
DuncanCJonesKMoonG, 1998, “Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research”Social Science and Medicine4697–117
16.
Eurobarometer 321989, Directorate-General Information, Communication, Culture, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
17.
FranklinM, 1996, “Electoral participation”, in Comparing Democracies, Elections and Voting in Global Perspective Eds LeducLNiemiR GNorrisP (Sage, London) pp 216–235
18.
FranklinM, 2004Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
19.
FranklinMvan der EijkCOppenhuisE, 1996, “The institutional context”, in Choosing Europe? The European Election and National Politics in the Face of Union Eds van der EijkCFranklinM (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 306–331
20.
HeathATaylorB, 1999, “New Sources of Abstention?”, in Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-term Perspective Eds EvansGNorrisP (Sage, London) pp 164–180
21.
JohnstonRJonesKSarkeRBurgessSPropperCBolsterA, 2003, “A missing level in the analysis of British voting behaviour: The household as context as shown by analyses of a 1992–1997 longitudinal survey”, WP 3, ESRC Research Methods Programme, http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/Working%20Paper%203.pdf
22.
MattilaM, 2003, “Why bother? Determinants of turnout in the European elections”Electoral Studies22449–468
23.
MillerW, 1988Irrelevant Elections? (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
24.
PattieCJohnstonR, 1998, “Voter turnout at the British general election of 1992: Rational choice, social standing or political efficacy?”European Journal of Political Research33263–283
25.
PattieCJohnstonR, 2003, “Local battles in a national landslide: Constituency campaigning at the 2001 British General Election”Political Geography22381–414
26.
PattieC JJohnstonR, 2005, “Electoral participation and political context: The turnout–marginality paradox at the 2001 British General Election”Environment and Planning A371191–1206
27.
RallingsCThrasherM, 1990, “Turnout in English local elections—an aggregate analysis with electoral and contextual data”Electoral Studies979–90
28.
RallingsCThrasherM, 1997, “The local elections”Parliamentary Affairs50681–692
29.
RallingsCThrasherM, 2003, “Local electoral participation in Britain”Parliamentary Affairs56700–715
30.
RallingsCThrasherMDowneJRidgeMLowryM, 2000Turnout at Local Government Elections: Influences on Levels of Voter Registration and Electoral ParticipationDepartment of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
31.
RasbashJBrownWGoldsteinHYangMPlewisIWoodhouseGDraperDLangfordILewisT, 2002A User's Guide to MlwiN Version 2.1dCentre for Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education, University of London
32.
ReifK, 1984, “National electoral cycles and European-elections 1979 and 1984”Electoral Studies3244–255
33.
ReifKSchmittH, 1980, “Nine national second-order elections: A systematic framework for analysis of European elections results”European Journal of Political Research83–44
34.
SchmittHMannheimerR, 1991, “About voting and non-voting in the European elections of June 1989”European Journal of Political Research1931–54
35.
WhiteleyRClarkHSandersDStewartM, 2001, “Turnout”, in Britain Votes 2001 Ed. NorrisP (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
36.
WoodhouseGRashbashJGoldsteinH, 1996, “Introduction to multi-level modelling”, in Multi-level Modelling Applications: A Guide for Users of MlnInstitute of Education, University of London, pp 9–57
37.
WorcesterR MMortimoreR, 2001Explaining Labour's Second Landslide (Politico's, London)
