In recent years there has been significant debate regarding the potential of participatory forms of governance to engage with diverse groups and the ‘politics of difference’. This paper explores these debates in the context of disabled people's engagement in urban policy processes, as an arena in which participative imperatives have become manifest under the UK's New Labour government. Drawing on a case study of a Single Regeneration Budget partnership, I argue that there are significant limits to disabled people's engagement in urban policy, ranging from their perceived legitimacy and constitution as a ‘relevant public’, through to the processes of partnership in which managerialist objectives clash with participative agendas. The paper therefore raises issues about the rationale for participation and the extent to which notions of deliberative democracy are equipped to deal with issues of ‘difference’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbberleyP, 2004, “A critique of professional support and intervention”, in Disabling Barriers: Enabling Environments2nd edition, Eds SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC (Sage, London) pp 239–244
2.
AtkinsonR, 1999, “Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration”Urban Studies36(1) 59–72
3.
BrownillSDarkeJ, 1998‘Rich Mix’: Inclusive Strategies for Regeneration (Policy Press, Bristol)
4.
CochraneA, 2003, “The new urban policy: towards empowerment or incorporation? The practice of urban policy”, in Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy Eds ImrieRRacoM (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 223–234
5.
DETR, 1998Single Regeneration Budget Bidding Guidance: A Guide for Partnerships (Round 5)Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
6.
EdwardsC, 2001, “Inclusion in regeneration: a place for disabled people?”Urban Studies38(1) 267–286
7.
EdwardsC, 2002, “Barriers to involvement: the disconnected worlds of disability and regeneration”Local Economy17123–135
8.
EdwardsC, 2003, “Disability and the discourses of the Single Regeneration Budget”, in Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy Eds ImrieRRacoM (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 163–180
9.
EdwardsCImrieR, 2003, “Disability and bodies as bearers of value”Sociology38239–256
10.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
11.
FraserN, 1997Justice Interrupts: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition (Routledge, London)
12.
FyfeN R, 2005, “Making space for ‘neo-communitarianism’? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK”Antipode37536–557
13.
GiddensA, 1998The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (Polity Press, Cambridge)
14.
GleesonB, 1998Geographies of Disability (Routledge, London)
15.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
16.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
HandleyP, 2000, “Trouble in paradise: a disabled person's right to the satisfaction of a self-defined need: some conceptual and practical problems”Disability and Society16313–325
18.
HastingsAMcArthurAMcGregorA, 1996Less Than Equal: Community Organisations and Estate Regeneration Partnerships (Policy Press, Bristol)
19.
HealeyP, 1997Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Macmillan, London)
20.
ImrieR, 1996Disability and the City: International Perspectives (Paul Chapman, London)
21.
ImrieRRacoM, 2003, “Community and the changing nature of urban policy”, in Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban policy Eds ImrieRRacoM (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 3–36
22.
KooimanJ, 2000, “Societal governance: levels, models and orders of social-political interaction”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, Democracy Ed. PierreJ (Sage, London) pp 138–164
23.
LowndesVSullivanH, 2004, “Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: how well do local partnerships and public participation go together?”Local Government Studies30(1) 51–73
24.
LowndesVNantonPMcCabeASkelcherC, 1997, “Networks, partnerships and urban regeneration”Local Economy11(4) 333–342
25.
MorrisJ, 1991Pride Against Prejudice (The Women's Press, London)
26.
MulganG, 1998Connexity: Responsibility, Freedom, Business and Power in the New Century (Vintage, London)
27.
Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, 2005Diversity and Neighbourhood Renewal FactsheetOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
28.
NewmanJ, 2001Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (Sage, London)
29.
NewmanJ, 2005, “Participative governance and the remaking of the public sphere”, in Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere Ed. NewmanJ (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 119–138
30.
NewmanJBarnesMSullivanHKnopsA, 2004, “Public participation and collaborative governance”Journal of Social Policy33203–223
31.
OliverM, 1990The Politics of Disablement (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
32.
OliverM, 1996Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice (St Martin's Press, New York)
33.
ParrHButlerR, 1999, “New geographies of illness, impairment and disability”, in Mind and Body Spaces: Geographies of Illness, Impairment and Disability Eds ButlerRParrH (Routledge, London) pp 1–24
34.
PhillipsA, 1993Democracy and Difference (Polity Press, Cambridge)
35.
RacoM, 2003, “New Labour, community and the future of Britain's urban renaissance”, in Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy Eds ImrieRRacoM (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 235–249
36.
RoulstoneA, 2004, “Employment barriers and inclusive futures?”, in Disabling Barriers: Enabling Environments2nd edition, Eds SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC (Sage, London) pp 195–200
37.
SawardM, 2005, “Governance and the transformation of political representation”, in Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere Ed. NewmanJ (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 179–196
38.
Social Exclusion Unit, 2001A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action PlanThe Cabinet Office, London
39.
SterlingR, 2005, “Promoting democratic government through partnerships?”, in Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere Ed. NewmanJ (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 139–157
40.
StewartJ, 2004, “Housing and independent living”, in Disabling Barriers: Enabling Environments2nd edition, Eds SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC (Sage, London) pp 149–154
41.
TaylorM, 1998, “Achieving community participation: the experience of resident involvement in urban regeneration in the UK”, in Community and Sustainable Development: Participation in the Future Ed. WarburtonD (Earthscan, London) pp 163–181
42.
Tewdwr-JonesMAllmendingerP, 1998, “Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning”Environment and Planning A301975–1989
43.
TilsonBMawsonJBeazleyMBurfittACollingeCHallSLoftmanPNevinBSrbljaninA, 1997, “Partnerships for regeneration: the Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund Round One”Local Government Studies23(1) 1–15
44.
YoungI M, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
45.
YoungI M, 1996, “Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy”, in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political Ed. BenhabibS (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 120–135
