Whilst St Petersburg is not usually considered as a command-and-control centre in the organisation of global capitalism—a key characterisation of world cities to some proponents—I reveal how Russian political elites have been inspired by a world-city vision for St Petersburg and have begun pursuing specific spatial strategies to accommodate this vision. In order to explain this experience, I attempt to establish a firmer conceptual link between ‘world city’, ‘urban entrepreneurialism’, and ‘state rescaling’ by articulating the concept of world-city-entrepreneurialiset. World cities are argued to be a political modus operandi and one possible layer in the multilayered and interrelated matrix of urban entrepreneurial strategies under neoliberalism. Four dimensions of world-city-entrepreneurialism are considered (with specific sociocultural reference to St Petersburg): (a) remaking the city as an international hub for circulatory capital and production, (b) making the city as a capital of corporate power, (c) reinventing the city character and tradition through globalist megaprojects, and (d) the role of central government. The evidence of emerging world-city-entrepreneurialism for St Petersburg is seen as part of the process of reorganising the principles of postsocialist spatial governance further away from the Soviet ‘scalar etiquette’ of administrative subordination and redistribution, and towards a neoliberal geoinstitutional regime of uneven accumulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlankenburgSPalmaJ G, 2009, “Introduction: The global financial crisis”Cambridge Journal of Economics33531–538.
2.
BradeIRudolphR, 2004, “Moscow, the global city? The position of the Russian capital within the European system of metropolitan areas”Area3669–80.
3.
BrennerN, 1998, “Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”Review of International Political Economy51–37.
4.
BrennerN, 2003, “‘Glocalization’ as a state spatial strategy: Urban entrepreneurialism and the new politics of uneven development in western Europe”, in Remaking the Global Economy: Economic–Geographical Perspectives Eds PeckJYeungH (Sage, London) pp 197–215.
5.
BrennerN, 2004New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
6.
BrennerN, 2009, “Open questions on state rescaling”Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2123–139.
7.
BrennerNKeilR, 2006The Global Cities Reader (Routledge, London).
8.
CoxK, 1997Spaces of Globalization (Guilford Press, New York).
9.
DouglassM, 2000, “The rise and fall of world cities in the changing space-economy of globalization: Comment on Peter J Taylor's ‘world cities and territorial states under condition of contemporary globalization’”Political Geography1943–49.
10.
FordL R, 2008, “World cities and global change: Observations on monumentality in urban design”Eurasian Geography and Economics49237–262.
11.
FriedmannJ, 1986, “The world city hypothesis”Development and Change1769–83.
12.
GolubchikovO, 2006, “Interurban development and economic disparities in a Russian province”Eurasian Geography and Economics47478–495.
13.
GolubchikovO, 2007, “Re-scaling the debate on Russian economic growth: Regional restructuring and development asynchronies”Europe —Asia Studies59191–215.
14.
GritsaiO, 2004, “Global business services in Moscow: Patterns of involvement”Urban Geography412001–2024.
15.
HallP, 1966The World Cities (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London).
16.
HallTHubbardP, 1998The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
17.
HarveyD, 1989, “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism”Geografiska Annaler B713–17.
18.
HarveyD, 2006Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development (Verso, London).
19.
HillFGaddyC G, 2003The Siberian Curse. How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
20.
HillR CKimJ W, 2000, “Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul”Urban Studies372167–2195.
21.
KihlgrenA, 2003, “Economic policy in Post-Soviet St Petersburg”Eurasian Geography and Economics44368–383.
22.
KingA D, 2000, “Postcolonialism, representation and the city”, in A Companion to the City Eds WatsonSBridgeG (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 261–269.
23.
KnoxPTaylorP, 1995World Cities in a World System (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
24.
KolossovVVendinaOO'LoughlinJ, 2002, “Moscow as an emergent world city: International links, business developments, and the entrepreneurial city”Eurasian Geography and Economics43170–196.
25.
KudrinA, 1997, “St Petersburg's progress towards the market”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21425–429.
26.
LikhanovaT, 2009, “Posledneye sevilskoye preduprezhdeniye: UNESCO predpisyvaet ostanovit proyekt ‘Okhta-tsentr’” [The last Seville warning: UNESCO orders to stop the Okhta-City project]Novaya Gazeta v Sankt-Peterburga 6–8 July.
27.
LoganJ RMolotchH L, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
28.
MarcusePvan KempenR, 2000Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order? (Blackwell, Oxford).
29.
MarshallR, 2002Emerging Urbanity: Global Urban Projects in the Asia Pacific Rim (Routledge, London).
30.
MasseyD, 2007World City (Polity Press, Cambridge).
31.
MatviyenkoV, 2006, “Yezhegodnoye poslaniye gubernatora Sankt-Peterburga, 29 marta 2006 goda” [The annual address of the St Petersburg Governor, 29 March 2006], http://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/governor/zaks.
32.
MellorR, 1997, “Through a glass darkly: Investigating the St Petersburg Administration”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21481–503.
33.
MikhalchenkoN, 2006, “Lozhka degtya v genplane Peterburga” [Controversies over the St Petersburg General Plan]Parlamentskaya Gazeta 7 February.
34.
Minregion, 2006Kontseptsiya Strategii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Draft Strategy for Socioeconomic Development of the Russian Federation's Regions] Russian Federation Ministry for Regional Development (Minregion), Moscow, http://minregion.ru/OpenFile.ashx/razv.doc?AttachID=184.
35.
MolotchH L, 1976, “The city as a growth machine”American Journal of Sociology82309–330.
36.
MoulaertFRodriguezASwyngedouwE, 2003The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
37.
NewmanPThornleyA, 2004Planning World Cities: Globalization and Urban Politics (Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
38.
OldsK, 2001Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture, and Pacific Rim Mega-projects (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
39.
OldsKYeungHW-C, 2004, “Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore”Review of International Political Economy11489–521.
40.
PallotJShawDJB, 1981Planning in the Soviet Union (Croom Helm, London).
41.
PaulD E, 2005, “The local politics of ‘going global’: Making and unmaking Minneapolis-St Paul as a world city”Urban Studies422103–2122.
RobinsonJ, 2002, “Global and world cities: A view from off the map”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26531–554.
44.
RussianGovernment, 2008Kontseptsiya dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [The Concept of Long-term Socioeconomic Development of the Russian Federation for the Period until 2020], adopted 17 November.
45.
St Petersburg Government, 2007Kontseptsiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sankt-Peterburga do 2025 goda [The Concept for Socioeconomic Development of St Petersburg until the Year 2025], adopted 20 July, http://gov.spb.ru/law?doc&nd=8453965&nh=0&ssect=0.
46.
SassenS, 1991The Global City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
SmithN, 2002, “New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy”Antipode34427–450.
51.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of state”, in Spaces of Globalization Ed. CoxK (Guilford, New York) pp 137–166.
52.
TaylorP J, 2004World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis (Routledge, London).
53.
TaylorP JWalkerDRFBeaverstockJ V, 2002, “Firms and their global service networks”, in Global Networks, Linked Cities Ed. SassenS (Routledge, London) pp 93–116.
54.
TaylorP JDerudderBSaeyPWitloxF, 2007Cities in Globalization: Practices, Policies and Theories (Routledge, London).
55.
TrumbullN, 2003, “The impact of globalization on St Petersburg: A secondary world city in from the cold?”The Annals of Regional Science37533–546.
56.
VisloguzovVGadalinaA, 2006, “Smena adresa ‘Gazprom nefti’ oboydetsya byudzhetu v $850 mln” [The change of address of Gazprom Neft will add $850 million to the budget]Kommersant 12 August.
57.
VladimirskiyA, 2008, “Krupneyshiye nalogoplatelschiki dolzhny brosit yakor v Peterburga” [The largest taxpayers have to anchor in St Petersburg]Fontanka.ru 8 May, http://www.fontanka.ru/2008/08/05/121.
58.
WuF, 2003, “The (post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai's reglobalisation in question”Urban Studies401673–1698.
