Now a recognised phenomenon in many British cities, studentification is the process by which specific neighbourhoods become dominated by student residential occupation. Outlining the causes and consequences of this process, this paper suggests that studentification raises important questions about community cohesiveness and that intervention may be required by local authorities if social and cultural conflicts are to be avoided. Detailing the social impacts of studentification in Loughborough, a market town in the English East Midlands, the paper accordingly considers recent housing policies designed to prevent the formation of exclusive ‘student ghettos’. The paper concludes by suggesting that the type of ‘threshold analysis’ utilised in Loughborough may well spread students more thinly across a city, but that the relationship between students and the wider community requires other forms of regulation if town–university tensions are to be effectively managed. Throughout, comparison is made between the Loughborough and other UK university towns where the challenges and opportunities associated with studentification have been differently addressed.
ArmstrongH WDarrallJGrove-WhiteR, 1997, “Maximising the local economic, environmental and social benefits of a university: Lancaster University”GeoJournal41339–350
3.
BarbaretRFisherB STaylorH, 2004Student Safety in the East Midlands Home Office Online Report 61/04 (The Stationery Office, London)
Charnwood Borough Council, 2005b, “Student housing provision in Loughborough—consultation draft: The preferred option in Loughborough”
8.
Charnwood Borough Council, 2005c, “Community—University Cohesion Working Party”
9.
ChattertonP, 1999, “University students and city centres—the formation of exclusive geographies”Geoforum30117–133
10.
ChattertonP, 2000, “The cultural role of universities in the community: Revisiting the university–community debate”Environment and Planning A32165–181
11.
ChattertonPHollandR, 2003Urban Nightscapes: Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces and Corporate Power (Routledge, London)
12.
Daily Mail2006, “The student ghettos”, 24 January, page 7
13.
DorlingD, 2005The Geography of the UK (Sage, London)
14.
FloridaR, 2002The Creative Class (Basic Books, New York)
15.
GlassonJ, 2003, “The widening local and regional development impacts of the modern universities—a tale of two cities (and North–South perspectives)”Local Economy18(1) 21–37
HallP, 1997, “The university and the city”GeoJournal41301–309
18.
HarloeMPerryB, 2004, “Universities, localities and regional development: The emergence of the ‘mode 2’ university?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28212–223
19.
Housing Act, 2004Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 34 (The Stationery Office, London)
20.
HubbardP, 2005, “Accommodating otherness: Anti-asylum centre protest and the maintenance of white privilege”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3052–65
21.
HubbardP, 2006, “NIMBY by another name?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3191–94
22.
JayneMHollowaySValentineG, 2006, “Drunk and disorderly: Alcohol, urban life and public space”Progress in Human Geography30451–468
23.
KenyonE L, 1997, “Seasonal sub-communities: The impact of student households on residential communities”British Journal of Sociology48286–301
24.
LambooyJ G, 1997, “Knowledge production, organisation and agglomeration economies”Geojournal41293–300
25.
LeyD, 1996Gentrification and the Middle Classes (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
26.
Nottingham City Council, 2006, “Supplementary planning document for the development of family and student housing”, Nottingham City Council
PeachC, 1996, “Does Britain have ghettos?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22216–235
29.
RogersPCoaffeeJ, 2005, “Moral panics and urban renaissance”City9321–340
30.
RuggJRhodesDJonesA, 2000The Nature and Impact of Student Demand on Housing Market (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York)
31.
ScottA JLewisALeaS E G, 2001Student Debt: The Causes and Consequences of Undergraduate Borrowing in the UK (Policy Press, Bristol)
32.
SmithD, 2002, “Patterns and processes of studentification in Leeds”Regional Review April, pp 6–7
33.
SmithD, 2004, “Studentification: The gentrification factory?”, in Urban Colonialism: Gentrification in a Global Context Eds AtkinsonRBridgeG (London, Routledge) pp 72–89
34.
SmithD PHoltL, 2007, “Studentification and ‘apprentice’ gentrifiers within Britain's provincial towns and cities: Extending the meaning of gentrification”Environment and Planning A39142–161
35.
StaeheliLThompsonA, 1997, “Citizenship, community and struggles for public space”The Professional Geographer4928–39
36.
The Independent2004, “Students no longer welcomed”, 21 October, page 8
37.
The Observer2006, “You can't live here, students told”, 29 January, page 19
38.
TysomeT, 2003, “Town and gown: The biggest employer but its customers are revolting”Times Higher Education Supplement 1 August, page 5
39.
Universities UK, 2006Studentification: A Guide to Opportunities, Challenges and PracticeUniversities UK, London
40.
van den BergLRussoA, 2004The Student City: Strategic Planning for Student Communities in EU Cities (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
41.
WebbEAshtonC HKellyFKamaliF, 1996, “Alcohol and drug use in UK university students”The Lancet348922–925
42.
WechslerHLeeJ EHallJWagenaarA CLeeH, 2002, “Secondhand effects of alcohol use reported by neighbours of colleges: The role of alcohol outlets”Social Science and Medicine55425–435
43.
WilsonW J, 1999The Bridge over the Racial Divide: Rising Inequality and Coalition Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
44.
WinchesterH P MWhiteP E, 1988, “The location of marginalised groups in the inner city”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space637–54
