In this paper, we seek to demonstrate the continued utility of research into the social production of scale in relation to the politics of natural-resource distribution, ownership, and control. While traditionally oriented toward sociospatial theory and urban governance, research has begun to convey the importance of scale as a discursive framing device at the center of multiple kinds of environmental politics. Our approach draws from recent literature to show the material-discursive ‘difference that nature makes’ in constituting the grounds of scalar struggle in mineral development. We argue that the fixity of certain natural-resource deposits and the concomitant local socioecological impact of extraction stands in stark contradiction to the multiscalar forces that vie over their development. Our central argument is that this contradiction ensures that struggles over natural-resource development are necessarily struggles over scale—the scale of ownership and the scale of distributional benefits and costs. The politics of natural resources must be couched in scalar terms and those who gain access to resources must build stable institutional–scalar platforms for the production of resource wealth. We illustrate this through an analysis of US Congressional debate over reform of the infamous ‘1872 Mining Law’ in 1993 as an exemplary moment of scalar politics. In this case, we not only attempt to show how the concept of scale frames these debates, but also how the failure to reform the 19th-century law allowed for the institutional materialization of particular scalar conduits for capital accumulation in the mining sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertKHullWSpragueD, 1989, “The dynamic West: A region in transition”, Council of State Governments, Western Office, 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 650, Sacramento, CA.
2.
American Barrick Resources Corporation, 1986, “Annual report”, American Barrick Resources Corporation, Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower, 161 Bay St, Suite 3700, PO Box 212, Toronto, ON.
3.
BakkerK J, 2003An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales (Oxford University Press, New York).
4.
BakkerK JBridgeG, 2006, “Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’”Progress in Human Geography305–27.
5.
BlaikieP, 1985Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries (John Wiley, New York).
6.
BlaikiePBrookfieldH, 1987Land Degradation and Society (Methuen, London).
7.
BollierD, 2001Public Assets, Private Profits: Reclaiming the American Commons in an Age of Market Enclosure (New America Foundation, Washington, DC).
8.
BoydWPrudhamW SSchurmanR A, 2001, “Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature”Society and Natural Resources14555–570.
9.
BoyleM, 2002, “Cleaning up the Celtic tiger: Scalar ‘fixes’ in the political ecology of tiger economies”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series27172–194.
10.
BraunB, 2006, “Towards a new Earth and new humanity: Nature, ontology, politics”, in David Harvey: A Critical Reader Eds CastreeNGregoryD (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 191–222.
11.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization, and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481.
12.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614.
13.
BrennerN, 2004New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Reseating of Statehood (Oxford University Press, New York).
14.
BrennerNJessopBJonesMMacLeodG, 2003, “Introduction: State/space in question,” in State/Space: A Reader Eds BrennerNJessopBJonesMMacLeodG (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–26.
15.
BridgeG, 2000, “The social regulation of resource access and environmental impact: Production, nature and contradiction in the US copper industry”Geoforum31237–256.
16.
BridgeG, 2004a, “Contested terrain: Mining and the environment”Annual Review of Environment and Resources29205–259.
17.
BridgeG, 2004b, “Mapping the bonanza: Geographies of mining investment in an era of neoliberal reform”The Professional Geographer3406–421.
18.
BrownJ CPurcellM, 2005, “There's nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon”Geoforum36607–624.
19.
BryantR LBaileyS, 1997Third World Political Ecology (Routledge, London).
20.
BulkeleyH, 2005, “Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks”Political Geography24875–902.
21.
CoxK R, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics”Political Geography171–23.
22.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political construction of scale”Political Geography1693–97.
EricssonM, 2002, “Mining M&A reaches record levels in 2001”Minerals and Energy—Raw Materials Report1719–26.
26.
FriedmanT, 2000The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization (Anchor Books, New York).
27.
GAO, Government Accounting Office, 441 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20548.
28.
GAO, Government Accounting Office, 1999, “Budgetary implications of selected GAO work for fiscal year 2000”, Report to Congress, No.GAO/OCG-99-26, http://gao.gov/archive/1999/cg99026.pdf.
29.
GAO, Government Accounting Office, 2007, “Royalties collection: Ongoing problems with interior's efforts to ensure a fair return for taxpayers require attention”, Report GAO-07-682T, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07682t.pdf.
30.
GibbsDJonasA, 2001, “Rescaling and regional governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the environment”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19269–288.
31.
GonzálezS, 2006, “Scalar narratives in Bilbao: A cultural politics of scales approach to the study of urban policy”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30836–857.
32.
GraignerA, 1999, “The role of spatial scale in sustainable development”International Journal of Sustainable Development6251–264.
33.
HaliechukR, 1993, “U.S. won't get royalties, Barrick vows”Toronto Star 30 April, page B3.
34.
HaliechukR, 1994, “American Barrick posts record profits, output results follow recent takeover of Lac Minerals”Toronto Star 1 November, page D10.
35.
HardtMNegriA, 2000Empire (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
36.
HarrisonJ L, 2006, “‘Accidents’ and invisibilities: Scaled discourse and the naturalization of regulatory neglect in California's pesticide drift conflict”Political Geography25506–529.
37.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Blackwell, Oxford).
38.
HarveyD, 2003The New Imperialism (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
39.
HerodAWrightM, 2002, “Placing scale: An introduction”, in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale Eds HerodAWrightM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–14.
40.
HeynenN C, 2003, “The scalar production of injustice within the urban forest”Antipode35980–998.
41.
HilliardT JLyonJ SReeceB A, 1994Golden Patents, Empty Pockets: A 19th Century Law Gives Miners Billions, the Public Pennies (Mineral Policy Center, Washington, DC).
42.
HowiitR, 1998, “Scale as relation: Musical metaphors of geographical sate”Area3049–58.
43.
HowiitR, 2003, “Scale”, in A Companion to Political Geography Eds AgnewJMitchellKO'TuathailG (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 138–157.
44.
HuF Z Y, 2005, “Deconstructing state-owned enterprise in socialist China under reform: A scalar examination”Environment and Planning A37703–722.
JessopB, 2002, “The political economy of scale”, in Globalization, Regionalization, and Cross-border Regions: Scales, Discourses, and Governance Eds PerkmannMSumN (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 25–49.
47.
KeilRDebbanéA, 2005, “Scaling discourse analysis: Experiences from Hermanus, South Africa and Walvis Bay, Namibia”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning7257–276.
48.
KurtzH E, 2003, “Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice”Political Geography22887–916.
49.
LabbanM, 2005The Contradiction of Space: Oil, Imperialism and the Accumulation of Capital unpublished PhD dissertation, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
50.
LeshyJ, 1987The Mining Law: A Study in Perpetual Motion (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC).
51.
LindsethG, 2006, “Scaled strategies in climate-change politics: Debating the environmental consequences of a natural gas project”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24739–754.
52.
McCarthyJ, 2005a, “Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance”Antipode37731–753.
53.
McCarthyJ, 2005b, “Commons as counterhegemonic projects”Capitalism, Nature, Socialism169–24.
54.
McClureRSchneiderA, 2001, “The General Mining Act of 1872 has left a legacy of riches and ruin”Seattle-Post Intelligencer 11 June, page A1.
55.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527.
56.
McMasterR BSheppardE S (Eds), 2004Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method (Blackwell, Oxford).
57.
MahtaniD, 2007, “Six oil workers held in Nigeria”Financial Times 2 May, page 12.
58.
ManderB, 2007, “Chavez declares state control of Orinoco oil fields”Financial Times 2 May, page 9.
59.
MansfieldB, 2005, “Beyond rescaling: Reintegrating the ‘national’ as a dimension of scalar relations”Progress in Human Geography29458–473.
60.
MansfieldBHaasJ, 2006, “Scale framing of scientific uncertainty in controversy over the endangered Stellar sea lion”Environmental Politics1578–94.
61.
MarotteB, 1994, “The money pit: American Barrick mines motherlode of cash, controversy”The Ottawa Citizen 31 May, page D6.
62.
MarstonS A, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242.
63.
MarstonS ASmithN, 2001, “States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner”Progress in Human Geography25615–619.
64.
MarstonS AJonesJ PWoodwardK, 2005, “Human geography without scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30416–432.
65.
MarxK, 1976 [1867] Capitalvolume I, translated by FowkesB (Vintage, New York).
66.
Nevada Department of Taxation, 2002, “Annual report, fiscal year, 2000–2001”, 15 January, Nevada Department of Taxation, Carson City, NV.
PeetRWattsM J, 1996, “Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in an age of market triumphalism”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM J (Routledge, London) pp 1–45.
69.
PerreaultT, 2005, “State restructuring and the scale politics of rural water governance in Bolivia”Environment and Planning A37263–284.
70.
PolanyiK, 1944The Great Transformation (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).
PrudhamW S, 2002, “Downsizing nature: Managing risk and knowledge economies through production subcontracting in the Oregon logging sector”Environment and Planning A34145–166.
73.
PrudhamW S, 2005Knock on Wood: Nature as Commodity in Douglas-fir Country (Routledge, New York).
74.
PurcellM, 2003, “Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: Toward a more synthetic critical human geography”Progress in Human Geography27317–332.
75.
SayreN F, 2005, “Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration”Progress in Human Geography29276–290.
76.
SchrijverN J, 1997Sovereignty Over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties in an Interdependent World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
77.
SimonB, 1993, “Goldstrike mine boosts American Barrick profit”Financial TimesInternational Company News, 5 February, page 19.
78.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
79.
SmithN, 1992, “Contours of a spatialized politics: Homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale”Social Text3354–81.
80.
SmithN, 1995, “Remaking scale: Competition, cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe”, in Competitive European Peripheries Eds EskelinenHSnickarsF (Springer, Berlin) pp 123–156.
81.
StrongmanJ, 1994Strategies to Attract New Investment for African Mining (World Bank, Washington, DC).
82.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization and the politics of scale’”, in Spaces of Globalization Ed. CoxK R (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–166.
83.
SwyngedouwE, 2004a, “Scaled geographies: Nature, place, and the politics of scale”, in Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method Eds McMasterR B SSheppardE S (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 129–153.
84.
SwyngedouwE, 2004b, “Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling”Cambridge Review of International Affairs1725–48.
85.
SwyngedouwE, 2007, “Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco's hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series329–28.
86.
SwyngedouwEHeynenN, 2003, “Urban political ecology, justice, and the politics of scale”Antipode35898–918.
87.
TaylorP, 1982, “A materialist framework for political geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series715–34.
88.
Toronto Star1993, “Barrick's stock falls anew on U.S. mine review”, 17 March, page D10.
89.
Toronto Star1994, “Barrick mine claim gold ‘heist’”, 17 May, page C9.
90.
TsingA L, 2005Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
91.
UNCTAD, 2004Development and Globalization: Facts and Figures (United Nations, New York).
US House of Representatives, 1993Mineral Exploration and Development Act H.R. 322 103rd Congress, 1st Session.
95.
US House of Representatives, 2007Hardrock Mining Reclamation Act H.R. 2262 110th Congress, 1st Session.
96.
US Senate, 1993a, “Mineral Exploration and Development Act of 1993”, Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development and Production of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Hearing, 16 March (S. Hrg. 103–149) (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
97.
US Senate1993bHardrock Mining Reform Act S. 775 103rd Congress, 1st Session.
98.
US Senate, 1993c, “Hardrock Mining Reform Act of 1993”, Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development and Production of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Hearing, 4 May (S. Hrg. 103–387) (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
99.
ZimmererK S, 2000, “Rescaling irrigation in Latin America: The cultural images and political ecology of water resources”Ecumene7150–175.
100.
ZimmererK SBassettT J, 2003, “Approaching political ecology: Society, nature, and science in human-environment studies”, in Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies Eds ZimmererK SBassettT J (Guilford Press, New York) pp 1–28.
