This paper connects research on home-based consumption with research on waste policy and governance. We argue that, in order to meet the enhanced goals of waste reduction specified in Waste Strategy for England 2007, UK municipal waste policy needs a far closer engagement with the household, the primary unit of consumption. Opening-up the ‘black box’ of the household, we show why the potential for achieving enhanced rates of materials diversion through recycling is limited in certain neighbourhoods. We demonstrate the potential for furthering waste reduction through the intensification of existing practices with the ‘arts of transience’, and by engaging with the lumpiness of household-waste generation. The paper considers the policy implications of these findings and offers a number of suggestions as to how such insights might be taken up within UK municipal waste policy.
BarrSGilgA WFordN J, 2001, “A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management”Environment and Planning A332025–2048
6.
BarrSFordN JGilgA W, 2003, “Attitudes towards recycling household waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches”Local Environment8407–421
7.
BulkeleyHWatsonMHudsonRWeaverP, 2005, “Governing municipal waste: Towards a new analytical framework”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning73–25
8.
BulkeleyHWatsonMHudsonR, 2007, “Modes of governing municipal waste”Environment and Planning A392733–2753
9.
BurgessJHarrisonCFiliusP, 1998, “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship”Environment and Planning A301445–1460
10.
Cabinet Office, 2002Waste Not, Want Not: A Strategy for Tackling the Waste Problem in EnglandStrategy Unit, The Cabinet Office, London
11.
ChappellsHShoveE, 1999, “The dustbin: A study of domestic waste, household practices and utility services”International Planning Studies4267–280
12.
ClarkeA, 2000, “‘Mother swapping’: The trafficking of nearly new children's wear”, in Commercial Cultures: Economies, Practices, Spaces Eds JacksonPLoweMMillerDMartF (Berg, Oxford) pp 85–100
13.
ClarkeA, 2001, “The aesthetics of social aspiration”, in Home Possessions Ed. MillerD (Berg, Oxford) pp 23–46
14.
DantT, 2005Materiality and Society (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
15.
DarbyLObaraL, 2005, “Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment”Resources Conservation and Recycling4417–35
16.
DavoudiS, 2000, “Planning for waste management: Changing discourses and institutional relationships”Progress in Planning53165–216
GregsonNMetcalfeACreweL, 2007a, “Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25682–700
30.
GregsonNMetcalfeACreweL, 2007b, “Moving things along: The conduits and practices of divestment”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series32187–200
31.
HandMShoveE, 2007, “Condensing practices: Ways of living with a freezer”Journal of Consumer Culture779–104
32.
HandMShoveESouthertonD, 2007, “Home extensions in the United Kingdom: Space, time, and practice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25668–681
33.
HawkinsG, 2001, “Plastic bags: Living with rubbish”International Journal of Cultural Studies45–23
34.
HawkinsGMueckeS (Eds), 2003Culture and Waste: The Creation and Destruction of Value (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
35.
HetheringtonK, 2004, “Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22157–173
36.
McDonaldSOatesC, 2003, “Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme”Resources Conservation and Recycling39369–385
37.
MadiganRMunroM, 1996, “House beautiful: Style and consumption in the home”Sociology3041–57
38.
MillerD, 1988, “Appropriating the state on a council estate”Man23353–372
O'BrienM, 1999, “Rubbish power: Towards a sociology of the rubbish society”, in Consuming Cultures Eds HearnJRoseneilS (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 262–277
41.
OwensS, 2000, “Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy”Environment and Planning A321141–1148
PettsJ, 2001, “Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: Waste management case studies”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management44207–226
44.
PorterM, 1998, “Waste management”, in British Environmental Policy and Europe Eds LowePWardS (Routledge, London) pp 195–213
45.
PriceJ L, 2001, “The landfill directive and the challenge ahead: Demands and pressures on the UK householder”Resources, Conservation and Recycling32333–348
46.
ShoveE, 2003Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality (Berg, Oxford)
47.
ShoveEPanzarM, 2005, “Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking”Journal of Consumer Culture543–64
48.
ShoveESouthertonD, 2000, “Defrosting the freezer: From novelty to convenience”Journal of Material Culture5301–319
49.
ShoveEWatsonMHandMIngramJ, 2007The Design of Everyday Life (Berg, Oxford)
50.
SkeggsB, 1997Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable (Sage, London)
51.
SlocumR, 2004, “Consumer citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection campaign”Environment and Planning A36763–782
52.
StrasserS, 2000Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash (Owl Books, New York)
53.
TongletMPhillipsP SBatesM, 2004, “Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: Waste minimisation compared to recycling”Resources Conservation and Recycling4227–48
54.
WardeA, 2005, “Consumption and theories of practice”Journal of Consumer Culture5131–153
55.
Waste and Emissions Trading Act, 2003Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 33 (The Stationery Office, London)
56.
WeaverP, 2005, “Innovation in municipal solid waste management in England: Policy, practice and sustainability”International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development121–45
