The author makes the case for studying intermediary organisations as a window on the shifting governance of water and energy services in Europe today. He explores the notion of intermediaries and intermediation in a wide range of literatures and demonstrates how the governance concept can provide focus to the term, indicating how intermediaries can influence the pursuit of collective goals under shifting governance structures and processes. Against this conceptual backdrop, the author sets out the key governance challenges emerging from the ongoing transformation of sociotechnical systems (addressing water and energy services) in terms of changing relations between the state and the utility, between service provider and user, between infrastructure and urban systems, and between infrastructure and the environment. Empirical illustration of the emergence of intermediaries in the water sector across Europe, the relational nature of their work, the interests they pursue, and the impacts they are having is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbateJ, 1999, “From control to coordination. New governance models for information networks and other large technical systems”, in The Governance of Large Technical Systems Ed. CoutardO (Routledge, London) pp 114–129
2.
AllenF, 2003, “On the logic of ‘new’ welfare practice: An ethnographic case study of the ‘new welfare intermediaries’”Sociological Research Online8(1), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/allen.html
3.
BenzA, 2004, “Einleitung: Governance—Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept?”, in Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung Ed. BenzA (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden) pp 11–28
4.
BeveridgeRGuyS, 2005, “The rise of the eco-preneur and the messy world of environmental innovation”Local Environment10665–676
5.
BeveridgeRGuyS, 2008, “Governing through translations: Intermediaries and the mediation of the EU's Urban Waste Water Directive”, unpublished manuscript available from Ross Beveridge, School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne
6.
BlatterJ, 2005, “Metropolitan governance in Deutschland: Normative, utilitaristische, kommunikative und dramaturgische Steuerungsansätze”Swiss Political Science Review11119–155
7.
BrennerN, 1999, “Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union”Urban Studies36431–451
8.
Commission on Global Governance, 1995Nachbarn in einer Welt. Der Bericht der Kommission für WeltordnungspolitikStiftung Entwicklung und Frieden, Commission on Global Governance, Bonn
9.
CoutardO, 1999, “Introduction. The evolving forms of governance of large technical systems”, in The Governance of Large Technical Systems Ed. CoutardO (Routledge, London) pp 1–16
10.
CoutardO, 2005, “Urban space and the development of networks: A discussion of the ‘splintering urbanism’ thesis”, in Sustaining Urban Networks: The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems Eds CoutardOHanleyR EZimmermannR (Routledge, London) pp 48–64
11.
CoutardOGuyS, 2008, “STS and the City: Politics and practices of hope”Science, Technology and Human Values32713–734
12.
CoutardOHanleyR EZimmermannR (Eds), 2005Sustaining Urban Networks: The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems (Routledge, London)
13.
EnnisF (Ed.), 2003Infrastructure Provision and the Negotiating Process (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
FingerMAlloucheJ, 2002Water Privatisation: Trans-national Corporations and the Re-regulation of the Water Industry (Spon, London)
16.
FürstD2003, “Regional Governance zwischen Wohlfahrtsstaat und neo-liberaler Marktwirtschaft”, in Demokratien in Europa: Der Einfluss der europäischen Integration auf Institutionenwandel und neue Konturen des demokratischen Verfassungsstaates Eds KatenhusenILampingW (Leske + Budrich, Opladen) pp 251–268
17.
FürstD, 2004, “Regional governance”, in Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung Ed. BenzA (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden) pp 45–64
18.
GandyM, 1997, “The making of a regulatory crisis: Restructuring New York City's water supply”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22338–358
19.
GandyM, 2004, “Rethinking urban metabolism: Water, space and the modern city”City8363–379
20.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
21.
GualiniE, 2002, “Institutional capacity building as an issue of collective action and institutionalisation: Some theoretical remarks”, in Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux Eds CarsGHealeyPMadanipourAde MagalhaesC (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 29–44
22.
GustedtE, 2000Nachhaltige Regionalentwicklung durch intermediäre Organisationen? (Ibidem, Stuttgart)
23.
GustonD H, 2001, “Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction”Science, Technology and Human Values26399–408
24.
GuySGrahamSMarvinS, 1996, “Privatized utilities and regional governance: The new regional managers?”Regional Studies30733–739
25.
GuySGrahamSMarvinS, 1999, “Splintering networks: The social, spatial and environmental implications of the privatization and liberalization of utilities in Britain”, in The Governance of Large Technical Systems Ed. CoutardO (Routledge, London) pp 149–169
HealeyPCarsGMadanipourAde MagalhaesC, 2002, “Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity”, in Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux Eds CarsGHealeyPMadanipourAde MagalhaesC (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 6–28
29.
HéritierA, 2002, “Introduction”, in Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance Ed. HéritierA (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 1–12
30.
HommelsA, 2005, “Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies”Science, Technology, and Human Values30323–351
31.
HughesT, 1983Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
32.
IlesPYollesM, 2002, “Across the great divide: HRD, technology translation, and knowledge migration in bridging the knowledge gap between SME's and universities”Human Resource Development International523–53
33.
JamisonARohracherH (Eds), 2002Technology Studies and Sustainable Development (Profil, Munich)
34.
JessopB, 1995, “The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change?”Economy and Society24307–333
35.
JessopB, 1998, “The rise of governance and the risk of governance failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal15529–45
36.
JessopB, 2002, “Governance and meta-governance in the face of complexity: On the roles of requisite variety, reflexive observation, and romantic irony in participatory governance”, in Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Contexts: Concepts and Experience Eds HeineltHGetimisPKafkalasGSmithRSwyngedouwE (Leske + Budrich, Opladen) pp 33–58
37.
JohnPColeA, 2000, “When do institutions, policy sectors and cities matter? Comparing networks of local policy makers in Britain and France”Comparative Political Studies33248–268
38.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE, 2000, “Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24120–138
39.
Le GalèsP, 1998, “Regulations and governance in European cities”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research22482–506
40.
LoskeRSchaefferR (Eds), 2005Die Zukunft der Infrastrukturen: Intelligente Netzwerke für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung (Metropolis, Marburg)
41.
MarvinSMeddW, 2004, “Sustainable infrastructures by proxy? Intermediation beyond the production–consumption nexus”, in Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision Eds SouthertonDChappelsHvan VlietB (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 81–94
42.
MayntzR, 2003, “Governance im modernen Staat”, in Governance: Eine Einführung Ed. BenzA (Dreifachkurseinheit der FernUniversität Hagen, Hagen) pp 71–83
43.
MayntzR, 2005, “Governance-Theorie als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie?”, in Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stadt und Entwicklungslinien Ed. SchuppertG F (Nomos, Baden-Baden) pp 11–20
44.
MeddWMarvinS, 2008a, “Making water work: Intermediating between regional strategy and local practice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26280–299
45.
MeddWMarvinS, 2008b, “The neglected work of intermediaries and intermediary space: Opening up an agenda”, unpublished manuscript available from Will Medd, Geography Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster
46.
MillerC, 2001, “Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime”Science, Technology and Human Values26478–500
47.
MossTWissenM, 2005, “Making senses of diversity: A synergy report on an inventory of 113 intermediary organisations of water management in Europe”, unpublished manuscript available from the author
48.
NewberyD M, 1999Privatization, Restructuring, and the Regulation of Network Industries (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
49.
PageBBakkerK, 2005, “Water governance and water users in a privatised water industry: Participation in policy-making and in water services provision: A case study of England and Wales”International Journal of Water338–60
50.
PehntMCamesMFischerCPraetoriusBSchneiderLSchumacherKVoßJ-P, 2006Micro Cogeneration: Towards Decentralized Energy Systems (Springer, New York)
51.
PierreJ, 2000, “Introduction: Understanding governance”, in Debating Governance Ed. PierreJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 1–10
52.
RhodesR A W, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
53.
RochlinG I, 2005, “Networks and the subversion of choice: An institutionalist manifesto”, in Sustaining Urban Networks: The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems Eds CoutardOHanleyR EZimmermannR (Routledge, London) pp 205–228
54.
RohracherH, 2002, “Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective”, in Technology Studies and Sustainable Development Eds JamisonARohracherH (Profil, Munich) pp 319–342
55.
RohracherHSpäthP, 2008, “Neue Chancen ungleich verteilt—Räumliche Ausdifferenzierungen bei der Energieversorgung im ländlichen Österreich”, in Infrastruktursysteme und Raumentwicklung: Zwischen Universalisierung und Differenzierung Eds MossTNaumannMWissenM (oekom, Munich)
56.
SelleK, 1994, “Was ist bloß mit der Planung los?”, Dortmunder Beiträge zur Raumplanung 69, Dortmund
57.
SouthertonDChappellsHvan VlietB (Eds), 2004Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
58.
StarS L, 1999, “The ethnography of infrastructure”American Behavioural Scientist43377–391
59.
StokerG, 2000, “Urban political science and the challenge of urban governance”, in Debating Governance Ed. PierreJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 91–109
60.
SummertonJ, 2004, “The new ‘energy divide’: Politics, social equity and sustainable consumption in reformed infrastructures”, in Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision Eds SouthertonDChappellsHvan VlietB (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 49–64
61.
TarrJ ADupuyG (Eds), 1988Technology and the Rise of the Networked City in Europe and America (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
62.
TrentmannF, 2006, “The modern genealogy of the consumer. Meanings, identities and political synapses”, in Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives, Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges Eds BrewerJTrentmannF (Berg, Leamington Spa, Warwicks) pp 19–69
63.
van KersbergenKvan WaardenF, 2004, “Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy”European Journal of Political Research43143–171
64.
van LenteHHekkertMSmitsRvan WaverenB, 2003, “Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes”International Journal of Innovation Management7247–279
65.
VoßJ-PBauknechtD, 2007, “Der Einfluss von Technik auf Governance-Innovationen: Regulierung zur gemeinsamen Nutzung in Infrastruktursystemen”, in Gesellschaft und die Macht der Technik: Sozioökonomischer und institutioneller Wandel durch Technisierung Eds DolataUWerleR (Campus, Frankfurt) pp 109–131
66.
WissenMNaumannN, 2006, “A new logic of infrastructure supply: The commercialization of water and the transformation of urban governance in Germany”Social Justice33(03) 20–37
