The last decade has seen a growing turn toward New Urbanism in the redevelopment of urban neighborhoods. In October 2007 the City of Santa Ana released a draft Renaissance Plan to revitalize a transit-oriented district and government center supported by two neighborhoods. The plan exemplifies New Urbanist design principles which promote mixed income residential neighborhoods and respect local culture. Using a case study in two Mexican and working-class immigrant barrios and the adjacent downtown district, we investigate these principles. We describe different community-wide perspectives concerning ‘redevelopment’ and employ a textual analysis of the Renaissance Plan. One salient finding is that local planning codes reflect and support cultural and class beliefs that alienate Latino barrios. Another finding is that it is in the construction of a new science of form that the disciplinary gaze of New Urbanism reshapes places upon cultural-alien and class-alien norms. We conclude by suggesting research on the tensions between ethno-cultural-dominant city councils and ethno-cultural and economically marginalized neighborhoods while exploring how policy and discourse impact urban place.
BohlC, 2000, “New Urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods”Housing Policy Debate11761–801.
6.
BrianD, 2005, “From good neighborhoods to sustainable cities: Social science and the social agenda of the New Urbanism”International Regional Science Review28217–238.
7.
California State Department of Finance, 915 L Street, Sacramento, CA 9581420072007 City Population Rankings.
8.
California State Department of Finance, 915 L Street, Sacramento, CA 958142008City Population Estimates.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012007a, “Minutes, October 24”.
13.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012007b, “Minutes, November 15”.
14.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012008a, “Minutes, January 24”.
15.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012008b, “Minutes, February 14”.
16.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012008c, “Minutes, March 13”.
17.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012008a, “Focus Group with Mujeres of Logan” Chepa Park Community Center, 1009 N Custer St., Santa Ana, CA 92701.
18.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 927012008b, “Focus Group with Downtown Business Owners and Lacy Residents”, El Centro Cultural de México, 310 W. 5th St., Santa Ana, CA 92701.
19.
Community Based Coalition Addressing the Renaissance Plan, La Chiquita Restaurant, 906 E. Washington Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92701 2008c“Lacy Resident Survey”, Chicana and Chicano Studies Department, California State University, Fullerton, PO Box 6868, Fullerton, CA 92834.
Congress for the New Urbanism and US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2000, “Principles for inner city neighborhood design: Creating communities of opportunity”, http://www.huduser.org/publications/pubasst/principle.html.
23.
CrumpJ, 2002, “Deconcentration by demolition: Public housing, poverty, and urban policy”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20581–596.
24.
DayK, 2003, “New Urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity”Journal of Planning Education and Research2383–95.
25.
DeitrickSEllisC, 2004, “New Urbanism in the inner city: A case study of Pittsburgh”Journal of the American Planning Association70426–442.
DiazD, 2005Barrio Urbanism: Chicanos, Planning, and American Cities (Routledge, London).
29.
DuanyA, 2001, “Three cheers for gentrification”The American Enterprise12 (3) 36–39.
30.
DuanyAPlater-ZyberkESpeckJ, 2000Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream (North Point Press, New York).
31.
FainsteinS, 2000, “New directions in planning theory”Urban Affairs Review35451–478.
32.
FaulkD, 2006, “The process and practice of downtown revitalization”Review of Policy Research23625–645.
33.
FaulkesM, 2008, “Physical and economic analysis of Santa Ana Renaissance Plan”, Professional Report, Department of Planning, Policy and Design, University of California, Irvine.
FoucaultM, 1977Discipline and Punish (Pantheon Books, New York).
36.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchellGMillerG P (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 87–105.
37.
GalarzaEGallegosHSamoraJ, 1969Mexican American in the Southwest (McNally and Loftin, Santa Barbara, CA).
38.
GarciaM, 2007Santa Ana's Logan Barrio: Its History, Stories, and FamiliesSanta Ana Historical Preservation Society, Santa Ana, CA.
KatzP, 1994The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community (McGraw-Hill, New York).
49.
KatzP, 2008, “Introduction to Form-Based Codes”, Form Based Regulations: Creating Tomorrow's Communities Development Program presentation, Orange County American Planning Association Chapter, Fullerton, CA.
50.
LangdonP, 2007, “LEED aims to set ‘First National Standard for Neighborhood Design’”New Urban News 27 September, http://www.newurbannews.com.
51.
LecceseMMcCormickK, 2000Charter of the New Urbanism (McGraw-Hill, New York).
52.
LejanoR, 2006Frameworks for Policy Analysis: Merging Text and Context (Routledge, New York).
53.
MarcuseP, 2000, “The New Urbanism: The dangers so far”DISP1404–6.
54.
MejidoM, 2005, “Beyond the postmodern condition or the turn toward psychoanalysis,” in Latin American Liberation Theology: The Next Generation Ed. PetrellaI (Orbis, Maryknoll, NY).
55.
MendezM, 2004, “Latino new urbanism: Building on cultural preferences”Opolis1 (1) 33–48.
56.
MontielL MNathanR PWrightD J, 2004An Update on Urban Hardship (The Rockefeller Institute of Government, Albany, NY).
PasselS JCohnD, 2008, “Trends in unauthorized immigration: Undocumented inflow now trails legal inflow”, report, Pew Hispanic Center, 1615 L St. NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036–5610.
63.
RobinsonGHolmanK, 2006, “Santa Ana empowerment zone: Resident survey”, unpublished report, Social Science Research Center, California State University, Fullerton.
64.
SaabA J, 2007, “Historical amnesia: New Urbanism and the city of tomorrow”Journal of Planning History6191–213.
SmithN, 1996The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (Routledge, New York).
67.
Social Compact Inc., 2006Santa Ana Drilldown unpublished report, Social Compact, Inc., 738 7th St. SE, Washington, DC 20003, http://www.socialcompact.org/santa_ana.htm.
TalenE, 2008, “New Urbanism, social equity, and the challenge of post-Katrina rebuilding in Mississippi”Journal of Planning Education and Research27277–293.
ThakurS, 2008, “Physical and economic analysis of Santa Ana Renaissance Plan”, professional report, Department of Planning, Policy and Design, University of California, Irvine, CA.
72.
The Kennedy Commission, 2008City of Santa Ana Land Held for Future Development: Community Redevelopment Agency Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2006–2007The Kennedy Commission, 17701 Cowan #200, Irvine, CA 92614.
The Tomás Rivera Policy Institute, 2006, “Hispanic population has grown more numerous than Asian and African Americans in 27 of the 50 states”, http://www.trpi.org/PDFs/27_states.pdf.
75.
US Census Bureau, 2000State and County Quick/acts: Santa Ana, CA (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
76.
US Census Bureau, 2008, “US Hispanic population surpasses 45 million: Now 15 percent of total”, http://www.census.gov.
77.
VillaH R, 2000Barrio Logos: Space and Place in Chicano Literature and Culture (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX).
78.
WacquantL, 2008Urban Outcasts: Towards a Sociology of Advanced Marginality (Polity Press, Cambridge).
