Coordinated (or ‘joined-up’) approaches to policy making are said to be an immensely important ingredient in the effective governance of sustainable development. There are, however, few detailed empirical studies of how well different policy coordination instruments perform in relation to this task. This paper identifies the United Kingdom as a critical test of how to achieve better policy coordination because it has been regularly identified as an exemplar of best practice in international benchmarking exercises. Specifically, it examines the integration of the environment into mainstream policy making through the application of policy appraisal in the strategically important areas of energy, defence, and public spending. Overall, it finds that the UK's much vaunted approach to coordinating the governance of sustainable development has struggled to tame the forces of departmentalism. While deploying carefully packaged combinations of coordinating instruments may address some causes of non-joined-up behaviour, perfectly coherent policy making is always likely to remain tantalisingly out of reach.
AdgerNJordanA (Eds), 2008Governing Sustainability (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
3.
BogdanorV, 2005, “Introduction”, in Joined-up Government Ed. BogdanorV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 1–18
4.
Cabinet Office, 1999Modernising Government (The Stationery Office, London)
5.
Cabinet Office, 2000Wiring It UpPerformance and Innovation Unit, London
6.
Cabinet Office, 2002The Energy ReviewPerformance and Innovation Unit, London
7.
CMPS, 2001Better Policy-makingCentre for Management and Policy Studies, London
8.
DegelingP, 1995, “The significance of ‘sectors’ in calls for urban public health intersectorism: An Australian perspective”Policy and Politics23289–301
9.
DeryD, 1999, “Policy by the way: When policy is incidental to making other policies”Journal of Public Policy18163–176
10.
DETR, 1998Policy Appraisal and the Environment: Policy GuidanceDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
11.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London)1998The Review of Energy Sources for Power Generation
12.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London), 2003Our Energy Future: Creating a Low Carbon Economy
13.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London), 2005The Energy Review: The Energy Challenge
14.
DunleavyP, 1991Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations and Public Choice (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
15.
ENDS, 2003, “Energy White Paper's grand vision undermined by delivery shortfall”, Environmental Data Services, ENDS Report, number 338, 26–32
16.
Environmental Audit Committee (The Stationery Office London)1999The Greening Government Initiative 1999 HC 426-II, Session 1998–99
17.
Environmental Audit Committee (The Stationery Office London), 2002aComprehensive Spending Review: Government Response and Follow-up HC 233, Session 2001–02
18.
Environmental Audit Committee (The Stationery Office London), 2002bPre-Budget Report 2001: A New Agenda? HC 363–II, Session 2001–02
19.
Environmental Audit Committee (The Stationery Office London), 2003Energy White Paper—Empowering Change? HC 618, Session 2002–03
20.
Environmental Audit Committee (The Stationery Office London), 2007Regulatory Impact Assessments and Policy Appraisal HC 353, Session 2006–07
21.
Green Ministers' Committee, 2002Sustainable Development in Government: First Report (The Stationery Office, London)
22.
HecloHWildavskyA W, 1981The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics (Macmillan, London)
23.
HertinJTurnpennyJJordanANilssonMRusselDNykvistB, 2009, “Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process”Environment and Planning A forthcoming
24.
HoodC, 2005, “The idea of joined-up government: A historical perspective”, in Joined-up Government Ed. BogdanorV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 19–42
25.
HM Government, 1990This Common Inheritance (HMSO, London)
26.
HM Treasury, 2006, “Treasury announces second comprehensive spending review”, press release, 19 July, HM Treasury, London
27.
JordanA, 2002a, “Efficient hardware and light green software: Environmental policy integration in the UK”, in Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe Ed. LenschowA (Earthscan, London) pp 35–56
28.
JordanA, 2002b, “Decarbonising the UK: A radical agenda from the Cabinet Office”The Political Quarterly73344–352
29.
JordanA, 2008, “The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2617–33
30.
JordanGHalpinD, 2006, “The political costs of policy coherence: Constructing rural policy for Scotland”Journal of Public Policy26(1) 21–41
31.
JordanALenschowA (Eds), 2008Innovation in Environmental Policy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
32.
JordanASchoutA, 2006The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
33.
LaffertyW MHovdenE, 2003, “Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework”Environmental Politics12(3) 1–22
34.
LindblomC E, 1979, “Still muddling through”Public Administration Review39517–525
35.
LingT, 2002, “Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems”Public Administration80615–642
36.
MetcalfeL M, 2000, “Reforming the commission: Will organizational efficiency produce effective governance?”Journal of Common Market Studies38817–841
37.
MoD, Ministry of Defence (The Stationery Office, London)1998aStrategic Defence Review
38.
MoD, Ministry of Defence (The Stationery Office, London), 1998bThe Strategic Defence Review Process: Supporting Essay to the Strategic Defence Review
39.
MoD, Ministry of Defence (The Stationery Office, London), 2000aStrategic Environmental Assessment of the Strategic Defence Review: Summary Report
40.
MoD, Ministry of Defence (The Stationery Office, London), 2000bStrategic Environmental Assessment of the Strategic Defence Review
41.
NAO, 2001Joining-up to Improve Public ServicesNational Audit Office, London
42.
NAO, 2006Regulatory Impact Assessments and Sustainable DevelopmentNational Audit Office, London
43.
NilssonMJordanATurnpennyJHertinJNykvistBRusselD, 2009, “The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union”Policy Sciences forthcoming
44.
OECD, 2002aEnvironmental Performance Reviews: UK (OECD, Paris)
45.
OECD, 2002bImproving Policy Coherence and Integration for Sustainable Development (OECD, Paris)
46.
OwensS, 2005, “Commentary: Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30287–292
47.
OwensSRaynerTBinaO, 2004, “New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice, and research”Environment and Planning A361943–1959
48.
PageE C, 2005, “Joined-up government and the Civil Service”, in Joined-up Government Ed. BogdanorV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 139–155
49.
PearceD W, 1998, “Cost–benefit analysis and environmental appraisal”Oxford Review of Economic Policy14(4) 84–100
50.
PetersB G, 1997Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of CoordinationCanadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa
51.
PetersB G, 1998, “Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination”Public Administration76295–311
52.
PollittC, 2003, “Joined-up government: A survey”Political Studies Review1(1) 34–49
53.
PowellW WDiMaggioP J (Eds), 1991The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
54.
PowerM, 2000“The Audit Society: Second thoughts”International Journal of Auditing4(1) 111–119
55.
RadaelliCDe FrancescoF, 2007Regulatory Quality in Europe: Concepts Measures and Policy Processes (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
56.
RCEP, 2000Energy: The Changing ClimateRoyal Commission on Environmental Pollution (The Stationery Office, London)
57.
RhodesR A W, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
58.
RichardsDSmithM J, 2002Governance and Public Policy in the UK (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
59.
RusselDJordanA, 2007, “Gearing up government for sustainable development: Environmental policy appraisal in central government”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management15(1)1–22
60.
SternN, 2006The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
61.
SwansonDPinterLBreghaFVolkeryAJacobK, 2004, “Sustainable development: Challenges, approaches and innovation in strategies and coordinated action”, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn
62.
TurnpennyJNilssonMRusselDJordanAHertinJNykvistB, 2008, “Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management51759–775
63.
YoungS C, 2000, “The United Kingdom: From political containment to integrated thinking”, in Implementing Sustainable Development Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies Eds LaffertyW MMeadowcroftJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 245–272
