Do You Want to Be Counted or Subject to a Light Touch? Research Assessment in the UK and the Social Sciences—Continued

Harvey D , 2006, “Editorial: the geographies of critical geography” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 31 409–412

Hirsch J E , 2005, “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 16569–16572

Johnston R J , 1993, “Formulaic follies: funding research in English universities” Environment and Planning A 25: 601–605

Johnston R J , 2006a, “The death—or dumbing down—of the RAE” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 321–323

Johnston R J , 2006b, “Research quality assessment and geography in Australia: can anything be learned from the UK experience?” Geographical Research 44 1–11

Johnston R J , 2008a, “The extent of influence: an alternative approach to identifying dominant contributors to a discipline's literature” Scientometrics 74 forthcoming

Johnston R J , 2008b, “On structuring subjective judgements: originality, significance and rigour in RAE2008”, Higher Education Quarterly 62 forthcoming

Nederhof A J Van Leeuwen T N Tijssen R J W , no date, International benchmarking and bibliometric monitoring of UK research performance in the social sciences: a CWTS report for the ESRC Leiden, University of Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Available at http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/lmages/Bibliometrics%20and%20the%20Benchmarking%20of%20UK%20Research%20Performance%20in%20the%20Social%20Sciences_tcm6-18356.pdf

Yeung H W-C , 2002, “Deciphering citations” Environment and Planning A 34 2093–2101