The emergence of the controversy over airport-generated noise at Brussels Airport as an environmental issue on the national political agenda coincided with the inauguration of Belgium's first ‘purple–green’ government in 1999. The new government announced explicitly the dawning of a new political age in which old controversies and adversarial left–right politics were relegated to the dustbin of history. From now onwards, the interests of market actors, environmental concerns, and social objectives would be negotiated and reconciled in the interest of all within the framework of a common and consensually agreed objective of achieving environmentally sustainable, socially inclusive, and market-based development. The controversy over DHL's night flights at Brussels Airport would prove to be one of the first real test cases of this ‘Third Way’ postpolitical approach to policing socioenvironmental affairs. However, after several years of acrimonious argument, successive attempts to negotiate a compromise with all relevant partners, and increasingly more entrenched antagonistic dispute, DHL abandoned Brussels Airport as its main European hub. This sequence belied the initial optimism of the government's postpolitical approach and, we argue in this paper, stands emblematically for the failure of such postpolitical modes of policing socioenvironmental affairs. The objective of this paper is to explore, both theoretically and empirically, the contradictions and tensions associated with the postpolitical model. First, we situate theoretically the emergence and consolidation of postpolitical modes of governing and the colonisation of the space of the political by forms of consensual depoliticised governance. Second, we shall analyse how urban socioenvironmental governance procedures associated with the problem of noise at Brussels Airport express the attempts to institute postdemocratic modes of governance, while exploring the contradictions of this model. In addition, the failure of postdemocratic and postpolitical arrangements is discussed, and an urgent need to repoliticise urban socioecological relations is argued.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAThriftN, 1995, “Institutional issues for the European regions: From market and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association”Economy and Society2441–65.
2.
AnnemansGLaeremansB, 2004, “Voorstel tot oprichting van een parlementaire onderzoekscommissie belast met het onderzoek naar de wijze waarop de overheid het dossier van de uitbreiding van het koerierbedrijf DHL heeft behandeld”, pp 1–11, Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, Brussels.
3.
BaetenG, 2009, “Regenerating the South Bank: Reworking the community and the emergence of post-political regeneration”, in Regeneration London: Governance, Sustainability and Community in the Global City Eds ImrieRLeesLRacoM (Routledge, London) pp 237–253.
4.
BallegeerE, 2003, “Diegem, geprangd tussen werk en nachtrust”De Morgen 16 January, page 6.
5.
BeckU, 1994, “Self-dissolution and self-endangerment of industrial society. What does this mean?”, in Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order Eds BeckUGiddensALashS (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 174–183.
6.
BeckU, 1997The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order (Polity Press, Cambridge).
De Standaard2000a, “Durant verliest veldslag maar nog niet de oorlog”, 13 January, page 1.
17.
De Standaard2000b, “Economisch-ecologisch compromis over nachtvluchten lijkt iedereen haalbaar”, 8 January, page 2.
18.
De Standaard2000c, “Geest uit de fles”, 13 January, page 8.
19.
De Standaard2002, “Eén troost: Ook de regering ligt hier wakker van”, 21 December, page 4.
20.
De Tijd2000, “Crisissfeer in regering na intrekken verbod nachtvluchten”, 13 January, page 1.
21.
De Tijd2003, “Brussel heeft nachtvluchten nog altijd niet verteerd”, 13 February, page 4.
22.
DikeçM, 2005, “Space, politics, and the political”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23171–188.
23.
DikeçM, 2007Badlands of the Republic. Space, Politics and French Urban Policy (Blackwell, Oxford).
24.
DobbelaereB, 2004, “Vlaamse regering laat DHL vertrekken”De Standaard 10 January, page 5.
25.
DoomsMVerbekeAMacharisCS'JegersR, 2006De zaak DHL. Het regional hub project van DHL in Brussel-Nationaal: een socio-economische en maatschappelijke evaluatie (Garant, Antwerpen).
26.
EeckhoutB, 2000, “‘Iedereen heeft recht op een paar uur stilte per dag’”De Morgen 8 January, page 28.
27.
GiddensA, 1991Modernity and Self-identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Polity Press, Cambridge).
28.
GoossensR, 2003, “Jean-Luc Dehaene: ‘Zijn ze bij DHL op hun kop gevallen?’”De Morgen 12 December, page 4.
29.
HaeckB, 2004, “Vlaamse regering ligt onder vuur in DHL-dossier”De Tijd 9 January, page 4.
30.
HensE, 2004, “Sociale partners vechten voor DHL-jobs in Zaventem”De Tijd 13 January, page 1.
31.
HuysentruytS, 2002, “Nachtvluchten schaden gezondheid”De Tijd 10 December, page 4.
32.
JD, 2002, “VLD laakt regeling voor nachtvluchten”Gazet van Antwerpen 29 October, page 16.
33.
JessopBSumN-L, 2006Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in their Place (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
34.
Knack2004, “Europees verbod op nachtvluchten?”, 5 May, page 16.
35.
KruegerRGibbsD, 2007The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the US and Europe (Guilford Press, New York).
36.
Lacoue-LabarthePNancyJ-L, 1997Retreating the Political (Routledge, London).
37.
LannooJ, 2004, “Leipzig geeft Zaventem uppercut in DHL-strijd”De Tijd 16 April.
38.
LissensJ, 2003, “DHL wil 9.000 nachtvluchten meer dan toegelaten”De Tijd 27 December, page 10.
39.
LoganJ RMolotchH L, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
40.
MaeckelberghB, 2002, “Samenstelling van het Overlegforum voor de luchthaven”Het Laatste Nieuws 6 July, page 16.
41.
MarchartO, 2007Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
42.
MarquandD, 2004Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship (Polity Press, Cambridge).
MouffeC, 2005On The Political (Routledge, London).
47.
NancyJ-L, 1992, “La comparution/the compearance: From the existence of ‘Communism’ to the Community of ‘Existence’”Political Theory20371–398.
48.
NassauxJ-P, 2006, “La région de Bruxelles—capitale face aux nuisances du traffic aérien (2004–2006)”Crisp—Courrier Hebdomadaire No. 1931/1932.
49.
Observatorium voor Gezondheid en Welzijn Brussel, 2006Welzijns- en gezondheidsatlas van Brussel-Hoofdstad 2006 (Observatorium voor Gezondheid en Welzijn Brussel, Brussels).
50.
RacoM, 2003, “New Labour, community and the future of Britain's urban renaissance”, in Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and the Urban Policy Eds ImrieRRacoM (Routledge, London) pp 235–249.
51.
RancièreJ, 1995On the Shores of Politics (Verso, London).
52.
RancièreJ, 1999Disagreement (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
53.
RancièreJ, 2001, “Ten theses on politics”Theory and Event5(3), doi: 10.1353/tae.2001 0028.
54.
Regering Verhofstadt I1999Regeerakkoord: De brug naar de eenentwintigste eeuw (Federale Regering, Brussel) pp 1–39.
SonckKRicourH, 2002, “Het rommelt boven de Noordrand”De Standaard 23 November, page 42.
63.
SwyngedouwE., 2005, “Governance innovation and the state: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state”Urban Studies421–16.
64.
SwyngedouwE, 2007a, “Impossible/undesirable sustainability and the post-political condition”, in The Sustainable Development Paradox Eds KruegerJ RGibbsD (Guilford Press, New York).
65.
SwyngedouwE, 2007b, “The post-political city”, in Urban Politics Now: Re-imagining Democracy in the Neo-liberal City Ed. BAVO (NAI Publishers, Rotterdam) pp 58–76.
66.
SwyngedouwE, 2009a, “The antinomies of the post-political city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33601–620.
67.
SwyngedouwE, 2009b, “The zero-ground of politics: Musings on the post-political city”, in New Geographies 1 After Zero volume 1, Eds RamosSTuranN (Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MA) pp 52–61.
68.
SwyngedouwE, 2010, “The trouble with nature: Ecology as the new opium for the masses”, in Conceptual Challenges for Planning Theory Eds HealeyPHillierJ (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 299–318.
69.
TickellAPeckJ, 2003, “Making global rules: Globalization or neoliberalization?”, in Remaking the Global Economy Eds PeckJWai-ChungH (Sage, London) pp 163–181.
70.
VanbrusselE, 2004, “Buitenland dingt naar de gunst van DHL”De Morgen 27 January.
71.
VanderhaegheS, 2003, “Oostrand en Brussel bij Verhofstadt: ‘Definitieve stop van nachtvluchten!’”Het Laatste Nieuws 24 January, page 13.
72.
Van De VeldenW, 2004a, “Akkoord over uitbreiding DHL in Zaventem”De Tijd 16 January, page 3.
73.
Van De VeldenW, 2004b, “Saga rond koerierbedrijf DHL landt dan toch in Zaventem”De Tijd 16 January, page 3.
