In this paper we examine the tradeoff between face-to-face (F2F) communication and a telephone call in the situation where people consider discussing something important but not urgent with a good friend located at a distance. In so doing we extend previous studies of communication behaviour in two ways. We develop and employ a situational approach to communication mode choice inspired by time geography and attitude theory, and we devote particular attention to the socio-psychological mechanisms driving communication mode decisions. As a consequence, we can analyse the effects of travel time in the physical world on communication choices via and in combination with those of a person's attitudes, perceptions, desires, and past behaviours. Our data collected from Dutch single-earner and dual-earner households suggest that travel time mediates the effects of goal desire, past behaviour, and perceived time pressure. When the travel time increases, respondents with a strong desire to discuss something important but not urgent trade a preference for F2F contact for a telephone conversation. Those who have frequently used the telephone in a similar situation before have a lower intention to conduct an F2F conversation but only when the travel time is short. Finally, we see that time-pressured respondents are more inclined to use the telephone when the travel time is longer, presumably because F2F communication involves more time in that situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI, 1991, “The theory of planned behaviour”Organizational Behaviour and Human Decisions Processes50179–211.
2.
ArmitageJ CConnerM, 2001, “Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A Meta-analytical review”British Journal of Social Psychology40471–499.
3.
AxhausenK WFreiA, 2008, “Contacts in a shrunken world”, available in the compendium of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board January 2007, Washington, DC.
4.
BagozziR P, 1981, “Attitudes, intentions, and behaviour: A Test of some key hypotheses”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41607–627.
BoaseJHooriganJ BWellmanBRainieL, 2006, “The strength of Internet ties: the Internet and email aid users in maintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions”, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC, http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_lnternet_ties.pdf.
7.
BodenDMolotochH L, 1994, “The compulsion of proximity”, in Nowhere, Space, Time and Modernity Eds FriedlandRBodenD (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 257–286.
8.
BollenK A, 1989Structural Equations with Latent Variables (Wiley, New York).
9.
BonevaBKrautR, 2002, “Email, gender and personal relationships”, in The Internet in Everyday Life Eds WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (Blackwell, Maiden, MA) pp 372–403.
10.
CarrascoJMillerE J, 2006, “Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social networks approach”, available in the compendium of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January, Washington, DC.
11.
ClaisseGRoweF, 1993, “Domestic telephone habits and daily mobility”Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice27277–290.
12.
DijstM, 2009a, “ICT and social networks: Towards a situational perspective on the interaction between corporeal and connected presence”, in The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research Eds KitamuraRYoshiTYamamotoT (Emerald Publishing, New York) pp 45–76.
13.
DijstM, 2009b, “Time geographic analysis”, in International Encyclopedia of Human Geography Eds KitchinRThriftN (Elsevier, Oxford) pp 266–278.
14.
DijstMFaragSSchwanenT, 2008, “A comparative study of attitude theory and other theoretical models for understanding travel behaviour”Environment and Planning A40831–847.
GolobT F, 2003, “Structural equation modeling for travel behaviour research”Transportation Research B: Methodological371–25.
19.
HägerstrandT, 1970, “What about people in regional science?”Papers of the Regional Science Association247–21.
20.
HägerstrandT, 1973, “The domain of human geography”, in Directions in Geography Ed. ChorleyR J (Methuen, London) pp 67–87.
21.
HaythornthwaiteCWellmanB, 2002, “The Internet in everyday life: An introduction”, in The Internet in Everyday Life Eds WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (Blackwell, Maiden, MA) pp 3–44.
22.
HubersCSchwanenTDijstM, 2011, “Coordinating everyday life in the Netherlands: A Holistic quantitative approach to the analyses of ICT-related and other work–life balance strategies”Geografiska Annaler B (forthcoming).
KennedyTWellmanBKlementK, 2003, “Gendering the digital divide”IT and Society172–96.
26.
KestnbaumMRobinsonJ PNeustadlAAlvarezA, 2002, “Information technology and social time displacement”IT and Society121–37.
27.
KlineR B, 2005Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).
28.
KwanM-P, 2007, “Mobile communications, social networks, and urban travel: Hypertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction”The Professional Geographer59434–446.
LaurierE, 2004, “Doing office work on the motorway”Theory, Culture and Society21261–277.
31.
LicoppeC, 2004, “‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22135–156.
32.
LicoppeCSmoredaZ, 2005, “Are social networks technologically embedded? How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology”Social Networks27317–335.
33.
LingR, 2004The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society (Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA).
34.
NieN HHillygusD S, 2002, “Where does Internet time come from?: A Reconnaissance”IT and Society111–20.
35.
ParkH S, 2000, “Relationships among attititudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures”Communication Studies51162–175.
36.
PeruginiPConnerM, 2000, “Predicting and understanding behavioural volitions: The interplay between goals and behaviours”European Journal of Social Psychology30705–731.
37.
PredA, 1981, “Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life”Geografiska Annaler, Series B635–22.
38.
PutnamD R, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York).
39.
SchwanenTKwanM-P, 2008, “The Internet, mobile phone and space – time constraints”Geoforum391363–1377.
40.
TillemaTSchwanenTDijstM, 2009, “Communicating something confidential while travelling by train: The use of a telephone conversation versus silent modes”Transportation36541–564.
41.
TillemaTDijstMSchwanenT, 2010, “Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content”New Media and Society doi:10.1177/461444809353011.
UrryJ, 2004, “Connections”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2227–37.
44.
UrryJ, 2007Mobilities (Polity Press, Cambridge).
45.
VerplankenBAartsHVan KnippenbergA, 1997, “Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices”European Journal of Social Psychology27539–560.
46.
WalshS PWhiteK M, 2007, “Me, my mobile, and I: The role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior”Journal of Applied Social Psychology372405–2434.
47.
WeiRLoV-H, 2006, “Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness”New Media and Society853–72.
48.
WitloxF, 2007, “Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis”Journal of Transport Geography15172–183.
49.
WittelA, 2001, “Toward a network sociality”Theory Culture and Society1851–76.
