In this paper we approach flooding as a socio–natural–technical assemblage, a phenomenon that comes into being in relation to the spaces that ‘bad water’ occupies. We use the case of the major flood in the city of Hull (UK) in June 2007, and the accounts of those who experienced it, to follow the water of the flood into homes and household spaces. We find that the spatial and temporal occurrence of the flood is not simply known and definable, but is instead emergent in specific local contexts. We show how the assemblage of the flood can be understood at different resolutions, moving from the flood as a city event; to the street-level processes and interventions which shaped how water flowed locally; and into the detail and materiality of the home, its transgression by water, and the process of the home becoming a flooded space. Through the analysis of data from two parallel projects examining the experiences of adults and children after the June 2007 event, we show that the boundaries of the flood remained open and contested, their spatial and temporal definition fuzzy and socially complex. Implications are explored in relation to the processes embroiled in producing flood status and the consequences for the actors involved. Wider conclusions for understanding the experience of disaster are also drawn.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnellN, 2002Hydrology and Global Environmental Change (Pearson Education, London).
2.
BakkerK, 2004An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
3.
BellH MTobinG A, 2007, “Efficient and effective? The 100-year flood in the communication and perception of flood risk”Environmental Hazards7302–311.
4.
BraunB, 2006, “Environmental issues: Global natures in the space of assemblage”Progress in Human Geography30644–654.
5.
BrillyMPolicM, 2005, “Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation”Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences5345–355.
6.
BucklePMarshGSmaleS, 2003, “Reframing risk, hazards, disasters, and daily life: A report of research into local appreciation of risks and threats”The Australian Journal of Emergency Management18 (2) 81–87.
7.
BirminghamKFieldingJThrushD, 2008, “‘It'll never happen to me’: Understanding public awareness of local flood risk”Disasters32216–238.
8.
CabinetOffice, 2008The Pitt Review: Lessons Learned from the 2007 FloodsCabinet Office, London.
9.
CallonM, 1986, “Elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 196–233.
10.
ConveryIMortMBaxterJBaileyC, 2008Animal Disease and Human Trauma: Emotional Geographies of Disaster (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
11.
CoulthardT JFrostickLHardcastleHJonesKRogersDScottM, 2007a, “The 2007 floods in Hull”, interim report by the Independent Review Body, 24 August, Hull City Council.
12.
CoulthardT JFrostickLHardcastleHJonesKRogersDScottM, 2007b, “The 2007 floods in Hull”, final report by the Independent Review Body, 21 November, Hull City Council.
13.
DaviesM, 2000Ecology of Fear (Picador, London).
14.
DouglasM, 1966Purity and Danger (Routledge and Keagan Paul, London).
15.
DupuisAThornsD, 1998, “Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security”The Sociological Review4624–47.
16.
EriksonK, 1976Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood (Simon and Schuster, New York).
17.
EriksonK, 1994A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma and Community (W W Norton, New York).
18.
GrahamS, 2010Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructures Fail (Routledge, London).
19.
HaradaT, 2000, “Space, materials, and the ‘social’: In the aftermath of a disaster”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18205–212.
20.
HockeyJPenhaleBSibleyD, 2001, “Landscapes of loss: Spaces of memory, times of bereavement”Ageing and Society21739–757.
21.
KaikaM, 2005City of Flows: Modernity, Nature and the City (Routledge, New York).
22.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts).
23.
MallettS, 2004, “Understanding home: A critical review of the literature”The Sociological Review5262–89.
24.
MarcusG ESakaE, 2006, “Assemblage”Theory, Culture and Society23 (2/3) 101–109.
25.
MilliganCBingleyAGatrellA, 2005, “‘Healing and feeling’: The place of emotions in later life”, in Emotional Geographies Eds DavidsonJBondiLSmithM (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 49–62.
26.
MolALawJ, 1994, “Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology”Social Studies of Science24641–671.
Oliver-SmithAHoffmanS M (Eds), 1999The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective (Routledge, London).
29.
OngACollierS, 2005Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Blackwell, Oxford).
30.
PettsGAmorosC (Eds), 1996Fluvial Hydrosystems (Chapman and Hall, London).
31.
SaundersP, 1984, “Beyond housing classes: The sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research8202–222.
32.
SaundersP, 1986Social Theory and the Urban Question (Hutchinson, London).
33.
SimsRMeddWMortMTwigger-RossC, 2009, “When a ‘home’ becomes a ‘house’: Care and caring in the flood recovery process”Space and Culture12303–316.
34.
StrangV, 2004The Meaning of Water (Berg, Oxford).
35.
StraussACorbinJ, 1998Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, London).
36.
SwyngedouwE, 2004Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
37.
TapsellSTunstallS, 2008, “‘I wish I'd never heard of Banbury’: The relationship between ‘place’ and the health impacts from flooding”Health and Place14133–154.
38.
TapsellSTunstallSPenning-RowsellEHandmerJ, 1999, “The health effects of the 1998 Easter flooding in Banbury and Kidlington”, report to the Environment Agency, Thames Region, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London.
39.
TapsellSPenning-RowsellETunstallSWilsonT, 2002, “Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A3601511–1525.
40.
WalkerMWhittleRMeddWBurninghamKMoran-EllisJTapsellS, 2010, “Children and young people after the rain has gone: Learning lessons for flood recovery and resilience”, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
41.
WhitmarshL, 2008, “Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response”Journal of Risk Research11351–374.
42.
WhittleRMeddWDeemingHKashefiEMortMRossTwigger CWalkerGWatsonN, 2010, “After the rain—learning the lessons from flood recovery in Hull”, final project report for ‘Flood, Vulnerability and Urban Resilience’: A real-time study of local recovery following the floods of June 2007 in Hull, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
43.
WynneB, 1991, “Knowledges in context”Science, Technology, and Human Values16111–121.
44.
YoungE, 1998, “Dealing with hazards and disasters: Risk perception and community participation in management”Australian Journal of Emergency Management13 (2) 14–16.
