This study investigates whether commercial offices designed by ‘signature architects’ in the United States achieve rental premiums compared with commercial offices designed by nonsignature architects. Focusing on buildings designed by winners of the Pritzker Prize and the Gold Medal awarded by the American Institute of Architects, we create a sample of commercial office buildings designed by signature architects, drawing on CoStar's comprehensive national database. We use a combination of hedonic regression model and a logit model to estimate the various price determinants. The results of the hedonic analysis suggest that, compared with buildings in the same submarket, office buildings designed by signature architects have rents that are 5%–7% higher, and sell for prices 17% higher. The results from the second-stage logit estimation suggest a rental premium of approximately 5% for signature architects in large architectural practices, while the sales-price premium identified in the first stage hedonic regression was not confirmed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArriazaMCañas-OrtegaJCañas-MadueñoJRuiz-AvilesP, 2004, “Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes”Landscape and Urban Planning69115–125
2.
AsaberePHacheyGGrubaughS, 1989, “Architecture, historic zoning and the value of homes”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics2181–195
3.
BaudrillardJ, 1981For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign (Telos press, St Louis, MO)
4.
BaumolW, 1986, “Unnatural value: Or art investment as floating crap game”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings7610–14
5.
BellDJayneM, 2003, “Design ‘led’ urban regeneration: A critical perspective”Local Economy18121–134
6.
BoothR, 2006, “Architect Foster brands it like Beckham to grab a fee”The Sunday Times 22 October, page 42
7.
BrownGGiffordR, 2001, “Architects predict lay evaluations of large contemporary buildings: Whose conceptual properties?”Journal of Environmental Psychology2193–99
8.
CarmonaMDe MagalhãesCEdwardsM, 2002, “Stakeholder views on value and urban design”Journal of Urban Design7145–169
9.
DaviesPSchmiedeknechtT, 2005An Architect's Guide to Fame (Architectural Press, London)
10.
DoveyK, 1992, “Corporate towers and symbolic capital”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design19173–188
11.
EvansG, 2003, “Hard-branding the cultural city—from Prado to Prada”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27417–440
12.
FosterH, 2002Design and Crime and Other Diatribes (Verso, London)
13.
FreyBEichenbergerR, 1995, “On the rate of return in the art market: Survey and evaluation”European Economic Review39528–537
14.
FrowJ, 2002, “Signature and brand”, in Highpop: Making Culture into Popular Entertainment Ed. CollinsJ (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
15.
GatD, 1998, “Urban focal points and design quality influence rents: The Tel Aviv office market”Journal of Real Estate Research16229–247
GoetzmannW, 1993, “Accounting for taste: Art and financial markets over three centuries”American Economic Review831370–1376
18.
GutmanR, 1988Architectural Practice: A Critical View (Princeton Architectural Press, New York)
19.
HoughDKratzC, 1983, “Can ‘good’ architecture meet the market test?”Journal of Urban Economics1440–54
20.
JonesP, 2006, “The sociology of architecture and the politics of building: The discursive construction of Ground Zero”Sociology40549–565
21.
JulierG, 2006, “From visual culture to design culture”Design Issues2264–67
22.
KlingmannA, 2007Brandscapes: Architecture in the Experience Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
KoolhaasR, 1978Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan (Random House, New York)
24.
LipstadtH, 2003, “Can ‘art professions’ be Bourdieuean fields of cultural production? The case of the architecture competition”Cultural Studies30390–419
25.
McNeillD, 2007, “Office buildings and the signature architect: Piano and Foster in Sydney”Environment and Planning A39487–501
26.
McNeillD, 2009The Global Architect: Firms, Fame, and Urban Form (Routledge, New York)
27.
MeiJMosesM, 2002, “Art as an investment and the underperformance of masterpieces”American Economic Review921656–1668
28.
PlazaB, 2006, “Return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27738–743
29.
RendellJ, 2006Art and Architecture: A Place Between (I B Tauris, London)
30.
RosenS, 1974, “Hedonic prices and explicit markets: Production differentiation in pure competition”Journal of Political Economy8234–55
31.
SaintA, 1983The Image of the Architect (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
32.
SchmiedeknechtT, 2004, “How to become an A-list architect”Architectural Research Quarterly88–9
33.
SherryJ, 2005, “Brand meaning”, in Kellogg on Branding Eds TyboutACalkinsT (John Wiley, New York) pp 40–69
34.
SongYKnaapG, 2003, “New urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment”Journal of Urban Economics54218–238
35.
TombesiP, 2001, “A true south for design? The new international division of labour in architecture”Architectural Research Quarterly5171–179
36.
TuCEppliM, 1999, “Valuing new urbanism: The case of Kentlands”Real Estate Economics27453–473
37.
VandellKLaneJ, 1989, “The economics of architecture and urban design: Some preliminary findings”AREUEA Journal17235–260
38.
VenturiRBrownDSIzenourS, 1972Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
39.
WernickA, 1991Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression (Sage, London)
40.
WinchG, 2008, “Internationalisation strategies in business-to-business services: The case of architectural practice”The Service Industries Journal281–13
41.
WrightF-L, 1986Letters to Clients (Architectural Press, London)
