By estimating bivariate panel vector autoregressions, this paper analyses the relationship between the revenue autonomy of Spanish regional governments and the regional growth experienced in Spain during the process of fiscal decentralisation from 1984 to 2008. The key finding is the presence of a significant, but marginal, positive effect of regional governments' revenue autonomy on regional growth during the period considered. The small size of the effect can be attributed to the fact that Spanish regional governments have not made extensive use of their important regulatory powers acquired in the 1996 review of the regional financing system or, alternatively, to the fact that the policy of increasing revenue autonomy might have reached saturation point during the period studied, with regard to its effect on economic growth. Both arguments are supported by the identification of an apparent breakpoint, in 1999, in the relationship between revenue autonomy and regional growth in Spain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaiNSakataM, 2002, “Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States”Journal of Urban Economics5293–108.
2.
BahlRLinnJ, 1992Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
3.
BaiJNgS, 2004, “A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration”Econometrica721127–1178.
4.
Balaguer-CollM TPriorDTortosa-AusinaE, 2010, “Devolution dynamics of Spanish local government”Environment and Planning A421476–1495.
5.
BirdR, 1993, “Threading the fiscal labyrinth: Some issues in fiscal decentralization”National Tax Journal46207–227.
6.
BreitungJMeyerW, 1994, “Testing for unit roots in panel data: Are wages on different bargaining levels cointegrated?”Applied Economics26353–361.
7.
BrennanGBuchananJ, 1980The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
8.
BruecknerJ, 2006, “Fiscal federalism and economic growth”Journal of Public Economics902107–2120.
9.
Carrión-I-SilvestreJEspasaMMoraT, 2008, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Spain”Public Finance Review36194–218.
10.
ChangY, 2002, “Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency”Journal of Econometrics110261–292.
11.
CliffDOrdA, 1981Spatial Processes: Methods and Application (Pion, London).
12.
DavidsonJ, 2000Econometric Theory (Blackwell, Oxford).
13.
DavoodiHZouH, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study”Journal of Urban Economics43244–257.
14.
DesaiRFreinkmanLGoldbergI, 2003, “Fiscal federalism and regional growth, evidence from the Russian Federation in the 1990s”, Policy Research WP 3138, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
15.
EbelRYilmazS, 2002, “On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization”, Policy WP 2809, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
16.
EzcurraRPascualP, 2008, “Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union Countries”Environment and Planning A401185–1201.
17.
FukasakuKde MelloL, 1998, “Fiscal decentralisation and macroeconomic stability: The experience of large developing and transition countries”, in Democracy Decentralization and Deficit in Latin America Eds FukasakuKHausmannR (OECD, Paris) pp 121–148.
18.
Gil-SerrateRLópez-LabordaJ, 2009, “Tax decentralisation, the flypaper effect, and growth”Urban Public Economics Review1052–71.
19.
GongLZouH, 2003, “Fiscal federalism, public capital formation and endogenous growth”Annals of Economics and Finance4471–490.
20.
HadriK, 2000, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panel data”Econometrics Journal3148–161.
21.
IimiA, 2005, “Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note”Journal of Urban Economics57449–461.
22.
ImKPesaranHShinY, 2003, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”Journal of Econometrics11553–74.
23.
JohansenS, 1995Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
LevinALinCChuC, 2002, “Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties”Journal of Econometrics1081–24.
26.
LinJLiuZ, 2000, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China”Economic Development and Cultural Change491–22.
27.
López-LabordaJMonasterioC, 2007, “Regional governments: Vertical imbalances and revenue assignments”, in Fiscal Reform in Spain. Accomplishments and Challenges Eds Martínez-VázquezJSanz-SanzJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 422–452.
28.
MaddalaGWuS, 1999, “A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics61631–652.
29.
MelocheJVaillancourtFYilmazS, 2004, “Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? Effect on growth and public sector size in European transition countries”, Policy Research WP 3254, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
30.
MusgraveR, 1959The Theory of Public Finance (McGraw-Hill, New York).
31.
OatesW, 1972Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).
32.
OatesW, 1993, “Fiscal decentralization and economic development”National Tax Journal46237–243.
33.
O'ConnellP, 1998, “The overvaluation of purchasing power parity”Journal of International Economics441–19.
34.
PanizzaU, 1999, “On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence”Journal of Public Economics7497–139.
35.
Pérez-GonzálezPCantareroD, 2009, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Evidence from Spanish regions”Public Budgeting and Finance2924–44.
36.
PesaranH, 2007, “A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics22265–312.
37.
PesaranHShinM, 1998, “Impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models”Economics Letters5817–29.
38.
RoddenJ, 2004, “Comparative federalism and decentralization. On meaning and measurement”Comparative Politics36481–500.
39.
Rodríguez-PoseABwireA, 2004, “The economic (in)efficiency of devolution”Environment and Planning A361907–1928.
40.
Rodríguez-PoseAEzcurraR, 2010, “Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries”Journal of Economic Geography first published online July 6, 2010, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq025.
41.
Rodríguez-PoseAKrøijerA, 2009, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe”Growth and Change40387–417.
42.
Rodríguez-PoseATijmstraSBwireA, 2009, “Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth”Environment and Planning A412041–2062.
43.
StegarescuD, 2005, “Public sector decentralization: Measurement concepts and recent international trends”Fiscal Studies26301–333.
44.
StiglerG, 1957, “The tenable range of functions of local government”, in Federal Expenditure Policy for Economic Growth and StabilityJoint Economic Committee, Subcommittee on Fiscal Policy, Washington, DC, pp 213–219.
45.
ThiessenU, 2003, “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries”Fiscal Studies24237–274.
46.
ThorntonJ, 2007, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered”Journal of Urban Economics6164–70.
47.
TieboutC, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424.
48.
WollerGPhillipsK, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization and LDC economic growth: An empirical investigation”Journal of Development Studies34139–148.
49.
XieDZouHDavoodiH, 1999, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States”Journal of Urban Economics45228–239.
50.
YilmazS, 2000, “The impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic performance”, in National Tax Association, Proceedings 1999National Tax Association, Washington, DC, pp 251–260.
51.
ZhangTZouH, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization, public spending and economic growth in China”Journal of Public Economics67221–240.
52.
ZhangTZouH, 2001, “The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: With applications to China and India”China Economic Review1258–81.
