Critical Success Factors in Urban Brownfield Regeneration: An Analysis of ‘Hardcore’ Sites in Manchester and Osaka during the Economic Recession (2009–10)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2011
Critical Success Factors in Urban Brownfield Regeneration: An Analysis of ‘Hardcore’ Sites in Manchester and Osaka during the Economic Recession (2009–10)
Hardcore, or long-term derelict and vacant brownfield sites which are often contaminated, form a significant proportion of brownfield land in many cities, not only in the UK but also in other countries. The recent economic recession has placed the economic viability of such sites in jeopardy. This paper compares the approaches for bringing back hardcore brownfield sites into use in England and Japan by focusing on ten case studies in Manchester and Osaka, using an ‘agency’-based framework. The findings are set in the context of (i) national brownfield and related policy agendas; (ii) recent trends in land and property markets in both England and Japan; and (iii) city-level comparisons of brownfields in Manchester and Osaka. The research, which was conducted during 2009–10, suggests that hardcore brownfield sites have been badly affected by the recent recession in both Manchester and Osaka. Despite this, not only is there evidence that hardcore sites have been successfully regenerated in both cities, but also that the critical success factors (CSFs) operating in bringing sites back into use share a large degree of commonality. These CSFs include the presence of strong potential markets, seeing the recession as an opportunity, long-term vision, strong branding, strong partnerships, integrated development, and getting infrastructure into place. Finally, the paper outlines the policy implications of the research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsDde SousaCTiesdellS, 2010, “Brownfield development: A Comparison of north American and British approaches”Urban Studies4775–104.
2.
APUDG, 2009, “Regeneration and the recession”, All Party Urban Development Group, London.
DEFRA, 2005Securing the Future: Delivering UK Sustainable Development StrategyDepartment for Environment, Food and Regional Affairs, London.
11.
Department for Social Development, 2007, “Vital and viable: a good practice guide for breathing life into towns and cities”, Department for Social Development, Belfast.
12.
DixonT, 2007, “The property development industry and sustainable urban brownfield regeneration in England: An analysis of case studies in Thames Gateway and Greater Manchester”Urban Studies442379–2400.
13.
DixonT, 2009, “Urban land and property ownership patterns in the UK: Trends and forces for change”Land Use Policy (DIUS Foresight Land Use Futures Programme) 26Supplement 1, S43–S53.
14.
DixonTOtsukaNAbeH, 2010, “Cities in recession: urban regeneration in Manchester (England) and Osaka (Japan) and the case of ‘hardcore’ brownfield sites”, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
15.
DolphinT, 2009, “The impact of the recession on northern city-regions”, IPPR North, Newcastle, Yorks.
English Partnerships, 2003, “Towards a national brownfield strategy”, English Partnerships, London.
18.
Environment Agency, 2009, “Reporting the evidence: dealing with contaminated land in England and Wales”, Environment Agency, Bristol.
19.
Environmental Protection Act, 1990Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 43 (HMSO, London).
20.
EvansJJonesPKruegerR, 2009, “Organic regeneration and sustainability, or can the credit crunch save our cities?”Local Environment14683–698.
21.
GanserRWilliamsK, 2007, “Brownfield development: Are we using the right targets? Evidence from England and Germany”European Planning Studies15603–622.
22.
GLA Economics, 2008, “Credit crunch and the property market”, GLA Economics, London.
23.
GrimskiDDoschF, 2010, “Brownfield management in Germany: A Sustainable issue”Journal of Urban Regeneration3246–262.
24.
GrimskiDFerberU, 2001, “Urban brownfields in Europe”Land Contamination and Reclamation9(1) 143–148.
25.
GuySHenneberryJ (Eds), 2002Developers and Development: Perspectives on Property (Blackwell Sciences/RICS Foundation, Oxford).
26.
HallM WMiyajiK, 2004, “In search of new risk management strategies using a comparative evaluation of environmental laws for soil contamination in the United States, Germany and Japan”IEEE 2004, International Engineering Management Conference Proceedings127–31.
27.
HarveyD, 1985The Urbanisation of Capital (Blackwell, Oxford).
28.
HCA, 2010, “Previously developed land that may be available for redevelopment: results from the 2008 national land use database of previously-developed land in England”, Homes and Communities Agency, Warrington, Cheshire.
29.
HealeyP, 1991, “Models of the development process: A Review”Journal of Property Research8219–238.
30.
HirayamaYRonaldR, 2008, “Baby boomers, baby busters and the lost generation: Generational fractures in Japan's homeowner society”Urban Policy and Research26325–342.
31.
HulaRBromley-TrujilloR, 2010, “Cleaning up the mess: Redevelopment of urban brownfields”Economic Development Quarterly24276–287.
32.
ImuraHSchreursM A, 2005, “Learning from Japanese environmental experiences”, in Environmental Policy in Japan Eds ImuraHSchreursM A (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 1–14.
33.
ItoM, 2003, “Hollowing-out of the Japanese manufacturing industry and regional employment development”, The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training, Tokyo.
34.
KaijoziTKaijoziM, 2004, “A mechanism leading from bubbles to crashes: The case of Japan's land market”Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications344(1/2) 138–141.
35.
Lambert SmithHampton, 2005National Brownfield Strategy Pilot Projects 2005: Research on Barriers to Regeneration. Volume 1: Main ReportLambert Smith Hampton, Manchester.
36.
MaceAGallentNHallPPorscheLBraunRPfeifferU, 2004Shrinking to Grow?: The Urban Regeneration Challenge in Leipzig and ManchesterInstitute of Community Studies, London.
37.
MIER, 2008, “Economic baseline 2008, Unit 2: business base”, Manchester Independent Economic Review, Manchester.
National Round Table on Environment and the Economy, 2003Cleaning Up the Past, Building the Future, A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy for CanadaNational Round Table on Environment and the Economy, Ottawa, ON.
44.
NEM, 2009Implementation Plan 2009/10New East Manchester, Manchester.
OtsukaNAbeH, 2008, “Challenges for brownfield regeneration: A Comparison of English and Japanese approaches”, in Brownfields IV: Prevention, Assessment, Rehabilitation and Development of Brownfield Sites Eds BeriatosABrebbiaC A WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (WIT Press, Southampton, Hants) pp 33–42.
52.
ParkinsonMBallMBlakeNKeyT, 2009The Credit Crunch and Regeneration: Impact and ImplicationsDepartment for Community and Local Government, London.
53.
PattonM Q, 1990Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Sage, London).
54.
PosenA, 2010, “The realities and relevance of Japan's great recession: neither Ran nor Rashomon”, STICERD Public Lecture, 24 May, The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economic and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics.
55.
POST, 1998A Brown and Pleasant LandParliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London.
Roger Tym and Partners, 2001Hardcore Sites: National SummaryEnglish Partnerships/Roger Tym and Partners, London.
60.
SasakiM, 2010, “Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study”Cities 27 Special issue on city, culture, social inclusion, Supplement 1 (June), s3–s9.
61.
SatoM, 2006, “The special districts for urban renaissance in Osaka City”Osaka and its Technology Journal (March), http://www.osakacity.or.jp.
Savills, 2009Offices: Osaka, Japan-1H 2009Savills, Hong Kong.
64.
ScottPJudgeG, 2000, “Cycles and steps in British commercial property values”Applied Economics321287–1297.
65.
Scottish Executive, 2006People and Place: Regeneration Policy StatementScottish Executive.
66.
ShibataK, 2008, “Neoliberalism, risk and spatial governance in the developmental state: Japanese planning in the global economy”, LSE Research Online.
67.
ShiratsukaS, 2003, “The asset price bubble in Japan in the 1980s: lessons for financial and macroeconomic stability”, DP 2003-E-15, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, Tokyo.
68.
ShirleyI, 2009, “The global recession: Its impact in Asia and the Pacific”Local Economy24254–261.
69.
SorensenA, 2002The Making of Urban Japan: Cities and Planning from Edo to the Twenty-first Century (Routledge, London).
TurvaniM, 2010, “An introduction to the reuse of contaminated sites for local sustainable development strategies”Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal3213–215.
72.
van der KrabbenENeedhamB, 2008, “Land readjustment for value capturing: A New planning tool for urban development”Town Planning Review79651–672.
73.
YasutakaT, 2007Quantification of Economical and Social Effects from Soil Contamination and its Solution unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University.
74.
YasutakaTMatsudaHMakinoM, 2007, “An estimating method for potentially contaminated brownfield sites: lessons from Japan”, in Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Managing Urban Land: CABERNET, Stuttgart, April pp 509–516.
