Tactical voting is an important element of British electoral behaviour, with approximately one sixth of all voters surveyed indicating that they voted tactically at the 2010 general election. Such voting for one's second preference party rather than one's first in order to prevent a less preferred party winning in a constituency is only rational in certain circumstances, reflecting the local context and electors' perceptions of the tactical situation there. Using 2010 British Election Study Internet survey data, this paper uses three separate definitions of tactical voting (two self-defined by the respondents, one inferred from a separate indication of their preferences) to test whether rational voting models successfully predict such behaviour. The findings are very clear and consistent with the theory, for all three groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezR MNaglerJ, 2000, “A new approach for modeling strategic voting in multiparty elections”British Journal of Political Science3057–75
2.
AlvarezR MBoehmkeF JNaglerJ, 2006, “Strategic voting in British elections”Electoral Studies251–19
3.
AshcroftM A, 2010Minority Verdict: The Conservative Party, the Voters and the 2010 Election (Biteback, London)
4.
BlaisABodetM A, 2006, “How do voters form expectations about the parties' chances of winning the election?”Social Science Quarterly87477–493
5.
BlaisATurgeonM, 2004, “How good are voters at sorting out the weakest candidate in their constituency?”Electoral Studies23455–461
6.
BlaisANadeauRGidengilENevitteN, 2001, “Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections”Electoral Studies20343–352
7.
BlaisADostie-GouletEBodetM A, 2009, “Voting strategically in Canada and Britain”, in Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States Eds GrofmanBBlaisABowlerS (Springer, New York) pp 13–26
8.
ClarkeH DSandersDStewartM CWhiteleyP, 2004Political Choice in Britain (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
9.
ClarkeH DSandersDStewartM CWhiteleyP, 2009Performance Politics and the British Voter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
CoxG J, 1997Making Votes Count (Cambridge University Press, New York)
11.
CurticeJ, 2009, “Neither representative nor accountable: first-past-the-post in Britain”, in Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States Eds GrofmanBBlaisABowlerS (Springer, New York) pp 27–46
12.
CurticeJ, 2010, “So what went wrong with the electoral system? The 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform”Parliamentary Affairs63622–638
13.
CurticeJSteedM, 1997, “The results analysed”, in The British General Election of 1997 Eds ButlerDKavanaghD (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 295–325
14.
CurticeJFisherS DFordR, 2010, “An analysis of the results”, in The British General Election of 2010 Eds KavanaghDCowleyP (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants), pp 385–426
15.
FisherS D, 2004, “Definition and measurement of tactical voting: the role of rational choice”British Journal of Political Science34152–166
16.
FisherS DCurticeJ, 2006, “Tactical unwind? Changes in party preference structure and tactical voting in Britain between 2001 and 2005”Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties1655–76
17.
GainesB J, 2009, “Does the United Kingdom obey Duverger's law”, in Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States Eds GrofmanBBlaisABowlerS (New York, Springer) pp 115–135
18.
GalbraithJ WRaeN C, 1989, “A test of the importance of tactical voting: Great Britain 1987”British Journal of Political Science19126–136
19.
HeathAJowellR MCurticeJEvansGFieldJWitherspoonS, 1991Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964–1987 (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
20.
JohnstonR JPattieC J, 1991, “Tactical voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: an alternative approach”British Journal of Political Science2195–128
21.
JohnstonR JPattieC J, 2006Putting Voters in their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
22.
JohnstonR JPattieC J, 2010“The local campaigns and the outcome”, in Britain at the Polls 2010 Ed. AllenNBartleJ (Sage, London), pp 203–239
23.
JohnstonR JPattieC J, 2011“The British general election of 2010: a three-party contest—or three two-party contests?”The Geographical Journal17717–26
24.
JohnstonR JPattieC JRossiterD J, 2008, “Electoral distortion despite redistricting by independent commissions: the British case 2005–2010”, in Redistricting in Comparative Perspective Eds HandleyLGrofmanB (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 205–224
25.
KavanaghDCowleyP, 2010The British General Election of 2010 (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
26.
MyattD P, 2007, “On the theory of strategic voting”Review of Economic Studies74255–281
27.
MyattD PFisherS D, 2002, “Tactical coordination in plurality electoral systems”Oxford Review of Economic Policy18504–522
28.
PattieC JJohnstonR J, 2005, “Electoral participation and political context: the turnout–marginality paradox at the 2001 British general election”Environment and Planning A371191–1206
29.
PattieC JJohnstonR J, 2009, “Still talking but is anybody listening? The changing face of constituency campaigning in Britain”Party Politics15411–434
30.
RallingsCThrasherM, 2007Media Guide to the New Parliamentary ConstituenciesLocal Government Chronicle Elections Centre, Plymouth
31.
SandersDClarkeH DStewartM CWhiteleyP, 2011, “Simulating the effects of the alternative vote in the 2010 UK general election”Parliamentary Affairs645–23
32.
van der EijkCvan der BrugWKrohNFranklinM, 2006“Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: on the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities”Electoral Studies25424–467
