What is the relation between security and a decision? How should decisions be taken as events unfold in unpredictable, aleatory, ways? And how are decisions made and constituted in particular and therefore differential security contexts? The paper draws on observations of ‘strategic’ exercises in UK Civil Contingencies, sites in which ‘multiagency’ responders take decisions in relation to the events that make up a range of crises, breakdowns, and interruptions. UK Civil Contingencies has a complicated relation with decision which challenges the predominance of approaches which prioritise the ‘sovereign decision’ as a preemptive act. On the one hand, the dream of emergency planners is of a decentred anticipatory system without the need for the event of decision, in which a distributed set of responders are primed to snap into action at the onset of an event and to follow protocols for how to connect and act together. On the other hand, and faced with the contingency of events and the mutability of the response network, decision is not erased, automated, or deferred but proliferates and, sometimes, is very difficult to make. Decisions have to constantly be taken about who to act with and how to act when faced with what the event could become: that is, when faced by the event's potential and, importantly, the complexity of response. In the paper we explore the relation between security and decision by outlining how the ‘exercise’ functions within emergency planning as a privileged site for the staging and performing of decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgambenG, 1998Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
2.
AgambenG, 2005State of Exception (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
3.
AmooreL, 2006, “Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror”Political Geography25336–351.
4.
AmooreLde GoedeM, 2008, “Transactions after 9/11: The banal face of the preemptive strike”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series33173–185.
5.
AndersonB, 2006, “Becoming and being hopeful: Towards a theory of affect”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24733–752.
6.
AndersonB, 2010a, “Security and the future: Anticipating the event of terror”Geoforum41227–235.
7.
AndersonB, 2010b, “Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies”Progress in Human Geography34777–798.
8.
AndersonBAdeyP, 2011, “Governing events: ‘emergency’ in UK Civil Contingencies”, unpublished manuscript available from authors.
9.
AndersonBAdeyP, 2012, “Affect and security: Exercising emergency in UK preparedness”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space forthcoming.
10.
AradauC, 2010, “The myth of preparedness”Radical Philosophy issue 161, 2–7.
11.
AradauCVan MunsterR, 2007, “Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future”European Journal of International Relations1389–115.
12.
ButlerJ, 2004Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (Verso, London).
13.
Cabinet Office, London2004Emergency Response and Recovery. Non-statutory Guidance Accompanying the 2004 Civil Contingencies Act.
14.
Cabinet Office, London2005Central Government Arrangements for Responding to an Emergency: Concept of Operations.
15.
Cabinet Office, London2009Expectations and Indicators of Good Practice Set for Category 1 and 2 Responders: The Civil Contingencies Act (2004), its associated Regulations, 2005, and guidance, the National Resilience Capabilities Programme, and Emergency Response and Recovery.
16.
Cabinet Office, London2010aEmergency Response and Recovery: Non-statutory Guidance Accompanying the Civil Contingencies Act 20043rd edition.
17.
Cabinet Office, London2010bThe Role of Local Resilience Forums: A Reference Document. The Civil Contingencies Act (2004), Its Associated Regulations, 2005, and Guidance, the National Resilience Capabilities Programme and Emergency Response and Recovery.
18.
Civil Contingencies Act, 2004Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 36 (The Stationery Office, London).
19.
CoaffeeJRogersP, 2008, “Rebordering the city for new security challenges: From counter-terrorism to community resilience”Space and Polity12101–118.
20.
CollierS JLakoffA, 2008, “Distributed preparedness: The spatial logic of domestic security in the United States”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space267–28.
21.
ConnollyW, 2005Pluralism (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).
22.
CooperM, 2006, “Preempting emergence—the biological turn of the war on terror”Theory, Culture and Society23 (4) 113–135.
23.
CooperM, 2008Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA).
24.
CooperM, 2010, “Turbulent worlds: Financial markets and environmental crisis”Theory, Culture and Society27 (2/3) 167–190.
de GoedeMRandallsS, 2009, “Precaution, preemption: Arts and technologies of the actionable future”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27859–878.
27.
DerridaJ, 1995The Gift of Death (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
28.
DerridaJ, 2002Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
29.
DillonM, 2002, “Network society, network-centric warfare and the state of emergency”Theory, Culture and Society19 (4) 71–79.
30.
DillonM, 2007, “Governing through contingency: The security of biopolitical governance”Political Geography2641–47.
DotyR L, 2007, “States of exception on the Mexico/US. border: Exceptions, enemies, and decisions on undocumented immigration”International Political Sociology1113–137.
33.
DotyR L, 2009The Law into Their Own Hands: Immigration and the Politics of Exceptionalism (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ).
34.
EkR, 2006, “Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the camp: An introduction”Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography88363–386.
35.
EldenS, 2009Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
36.
FoucaultM, 2001The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (Routledge, London).
37.
FoucaultM, 2007Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78 (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
38.
GivoniM, 2008, “Witnessing in action: Ethics and politics in a world without borders”Roundtable: Research Architecturehttp://roundtable.kein.org/node/1077.
GregoryD, 2007, “Vanishing points: Law, violence and exception in the global war prison”, in Violent Geographies: Fear, Terror and Political Violence Eds GregoryDPredA (Routledge, New York) pp 317–344.
42.
HennessyPJeffreyK, 1983States of Emergency: British Governments and Strikebreaking since 1919 (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
43.
Home Office, 1998The Exercise Planners GuideHome Office, London.
44.
LakoffA, 2008, “The generic biothreat, or, how we became unprepared”Cultural Anthropology23399–428.
45.
MassumiB, 2002Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).
PuglieseJ, 2007, “Biometrics, infrastructural whiteness, and the racilized zero degre of nonrepresentation”boundary 234 (2) 105–133.
52.
ReynoldsJRoffeJ, 2004Understanding Derrida (Continuum, New York).
53.
SalterM B, 2006, “The global visa regime and the political technologies of the international self: Borders, bodies, biopolitics”Alternatives: Global, Local, Political31167–189.
54.
SalterM B, 2008, “When the exception becomes the rule: Borders, sovereignty, and citizenship”Citizenship Studies12365–380.
55.
Schoch-SpanaM, 2004, “Bioterrorism: U.S. public health and a secular apocalypse”Anthropology Today20 (5) 1–6.
56.
Terrorism Act, 2000Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter II (The Stationery Office, London).
57.
ThriftN, 2004, “Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect”Geografiska Annaler, Series B8657–78.
58.
Vaughan-WilliamsN, 2009, “The generalised bio-political border? Re-conceptualising the limits of sovereign power”Review of International Studies35729–750.
59.
von ClausewitzK, 1968On War (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middx).
60.
WeberC, 2005, “Securitising the unconscious: The Bush Doctrine of Preemption and Minority Report”Geopolitics10482–499.
61.
WeberL, 2007, “Policing the virtual border: Punitive preemption in Australian offshore migration control”Social Justice34 (2) 77–93.
62.
WoodwardB, 2004Plan of Attack (Simon and Schuster, New York).
