This paper examines the political ecological effects of the expansion of an urban centralized water-supply network and the transformation of it into a full-cost-recovery system in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. It draws on data collected through a 2007 household survey of six Jaipur neighborhoods stratified by class; follow-up household interviews in 2007 and 2009; and interviews with public water supply managers and private water tanker vendors in both 2007 and 2009. The investigation concludes that the spatially uneven integration of network expansion and the intermittent flow of water circulating through it, combined with historical axes of political economic difference produces uneven adaptive responses to maintain access to water, such as waiting on water, private tubewell construction, and private water tanker operations, while transforming social power relations. It is concluded, first, that these uneven flows and cost-recovery initiatives are exacerbating current disparities in access to drinking water and, second, that the current public water-supply system has only been partially reformed and that these policy changes have rendered the public supplier unable to recover costs. This makes the need for a private sector rescue of an incapacitated and inefficient public institution seem obvious to planners, yet the public utility's inability to set costs or to set infrastructure priorities draws into question the need for the private sector and full-cost-recovery reforms.
BakkerK, 2000, “Privatizing water, producing scarcity: The Yorkshire drought of 1995”Economic Geography764–27.
3.
BakkerK, 2002, “From state to market?: Water mercantilización in Spain”Environment and Planning A34767–790.
4.
BakkerK, 2003a, “Archipelagos and networks: Urbanization and water privatization in the South”Geographical Journal169328–341.
5.
BakkerK, 2003b, “From public to private to … mutual? Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales”Geoforum34359–374.
6.
BakkerK, 2005, “Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales”Annals of the Association of American Geographers95542–565.
7.
BakkerK, 2007a, “Trickle down? Private sector participation and the pro-poor water supply debate in Jakarta, Indonesia”Geoforum38855–868.
8.
BakkerK, 2007b, “The ‘commons’ versus the ‘commodity’: Alter-globalization, anti-privatization and the human right to water in the global south”Antipode39430–455.
9.
BirkenholtzT, 2008, “Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern India groundwater practices”Geoforum39466–482.
10.
BirkenholtzT, 2009, “Irrigated landscapes, produced scarcity, and adaptive social institutions in Rajasthan, India”Annals of the Association of American Geographers99118–137.
11.
BrookPLocussolA, 2001, “Easing tariff increases: Financing the transition in cost-covering water tariffs in Guinea”, Contracting for Public Services: Output-based Aid and its Applications Eds BrookPSmithS (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 31–37, http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/08ch3.pdf.
12.
BuddsJ, 2004, “Power, nature and neoliberalism: The political ecology of water in Chile”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography25322–342.
13.
BuddsJMcGranahanG, 2003, “Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America”Environment and Urbanization1587–113.
14.
CastreeN, 2008a, “Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation”Environment and Planning A40131–152.
15.
CastreeN, 2008b, “Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations”Environment and Planning A40153–171.
16.
DermanBFergusonA, 2003, “Value of water: Political ecology and water reform in southern Africa”Human Organization62277–288.
17.
Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2009, “Statistical Abstract-Rajasthan 2009”, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Jaipur.
18.
EkersMLoftusA, 2008, “The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26698–718.
19.
GandyM, 2002Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
20.
GandyM, 2008, “Landscapes of disaster: Water, modernity, and urban fragmentation in Mumbai”Environment and Planning A40108–130.
21.
GesslerMBrighuUFranceysR, 2008, “The challenge of economic regulation of water and sanitation in urban India”Habitat International3249–57.
22.
GleickP H, 2003, “Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century”Science3021524–1528.
23.
GoldmanM, 2005, “Privatizing water, neoliberalizing civil society: The power of transnational policy networks”, in Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) pp 221–271.
HaughtonG, 2001, “Paying up-reducing state costs, changing state responsibilities for water management”Journal of Planning Education and Research2164–70.
26.
HaughtonG, 2002, “Market making: Internationalisation and global water markets”Environment and Planning A34791–807.
27.
JeffreyCJeffreyPJeffreyR, 2008Degrees Without Freedom: Education, Masculinities, and Unemployment in North India (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
28.
JohnstonB R, 2003, “The political ecology of water: An introduction”Capitalism Nature Socialism1473–90.
29.
KaikaM, 2005City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City (Routledge, New York).
30.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE, 2000, “Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24120–138.
31.
LoftusA, 2006, “Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter”Antipode381023–1045.
32.
LoftusA, 2007, “Working the socio-natural relations of the urban waterscape in South Africa”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3141–59.
33.
LoftusA, 2009, “Rethinking poltiical ecoogies of water”Third World Quarterly30953–968.
34.
McFarlaneC, 2008, “Sanitation in Mumbai's informal settlements: State, ‘slum’, and infrastructure”Environment and Planning A4088–107.
35.
MassaruttoA, 2007, “Water pricing and full cost recovery of water services: Economic incentive or instrument of public finance?”Water Policy9591–613.
36.
MassaruttoAPaccagnanVLinaresE, 2008, “Private management and public finance in the Italian water industry: A Marriage of convenience?”Water Resources Research44.
37.
MitraS G, 2008, “Power and policy processes in drinking water supply in Karnataka, India”Development5196–101.
38.
MukherjiAShahT, 2005, “Groundwater socio-ecology and governance: A Review of institutions and policies in selected countries”Hydrogeology Journal13328–345.
OzaR, 2006The Making of Neoliberal India: Nationalism, Gender, and the Paradoxes of Globalization (Routledge, New York).
41.
PageB, 2005, “Paying for water and the geography of commodities”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30293–306.
42.
PerreaultT, 2005, “State restructuring and the scale politics of rural water governance in Bolivia”Environment and Planning A37263–284.
43.
PrudhamS, 2004, “Poisoning the well: Neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario”Geoforum35343–360.
44.
ReddyV R, 1996Urban Water Crisis: Rationale for Pricing (Rawat Publications, Jaipur).
45.
RodellMVelicognaIFamigliettiJ S, 2009, “Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India”Nature460999–1002.
46.
RUIDP, 2007, “Tariff structure for domestic connections”, Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure Development Project, Public Health Engineering Department, Jaipur.
47.
SenA, 1999Development as Freedom (Anchor Books, New York).
48.
ShahT, 2005, “Groundwater and human development: Challenges and opportunities in livelihoods and environment”Water Science and Technology5127–37.
49.
SharmaK, 2004, “Mumbai (Bombay)”, in Encyclopedia of Homelessness Ed. LevinsonD (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 397–399.
50.
SwyngedouwE, 1999, “Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89443–465.
51.
SwyngedouwE, 2004Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
52.
Times of India2009, “Another child dies, water in Subhash Colony blamed” 10 June.
53.
TrawickP, 2003, “Against the privatization of water: An indigenous model for improving existing laws and successfully governing the commons”World Development31977–996.
54.
VeronR, 2006, “Remaking urban environments: The political ecology of air pollution in Delhi”Environment and Planning A382093–2109.
55.
WilderMLankaoP R, 2006, “Paradoxes of decentralization: Water reform and social implications in Mexico”World Development341977–1995.
