The paper analyses trends in the location of commercial, industrial, and different residential land uses in the four largest metropolitan cities of South Africa over the past decade. Recent development patterns show strong decentralisation trends of away from core cities to the metropolitan fringes despite proactive containment policies. Elements of the differential urbanisation model are used to explain heterogeneous migration patterns within a rapidly urbanising South African population. Indications are that strong centrifugal patterns in the cities are linked to both local decentralisation and deflected urbanisation at the regional level. This results in continuing social stratification in all four agglomerations and the continuation of the ‘post-apartheid city.’ The persistent movement of populations and commercial and industrial land uses to the urban fringe has resulted in the strengthening of the multicentric urban framework of the four metropolitan cities.
AguilarAGraizbordB, 2002, “Evolution and maturing of the Mexican Urban System”, in International Handbook of Urban Systems: Studies of Urbanization and Migration in Advanced and Developing Countries Ed. GeyerH (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 419–454
2.
BaldwinRForslidRMartinPOttavianoGRobert-NicoudF, 2003, Economic Geography and Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
3.
BealeC, 1975The Revival of Population Growth in Nonmetropolitan America (Economic Research Service, Washington, DC)
4.
BerryB, 1976, “The counterurbanization process: Urban America since 1970”Urban Affairs Annual Review1117–30
5.
BerryB, 1988, “Migration reversals in perspective: The long-wave evidence”International Regional Science Review11245–251
6.
BonifaziCHeinsF, 2003, “Testing the differential urbanization model for Italy”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9423–37
7.
BurgessE, 1925, “The growth of the city”, in The City Eds ParkRBurgessEMacKenzieR (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) pp 47–62
8.
ChampionA, 1988, “The reversal of the migration turnaround: Resumption of traditional trends?”International Regional Science Review11253–260
9.
ChampionA, 1989, “Counterurbanisation: The conceptual and methodological challenge”, in Counterurbanisation: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration Ed. ChampionA (Edward Arnold, London) pp 19–33
10.
ChampionA, 2003, “Testing the differential urbanization model: Great Britain, 1901–1991”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9411–22
11.
ClarkC, 1967Population Growth and Land Use (St Martin's Press, New York)
12.
CrankshawO, 2008, “Race, space and the post-Fordist spatial order of Johannesburg”Urban Studies451692–1711
13.
ElliottJ, 1997, “Cycles within the system: Metropolitanisation and internal migration in the US, 1965–90”Urban Studies3421–41
14.
FaludiAValkA, 1994Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)
15.
FieldingA, 1989, “Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950”The Geographical Journal155(1) 60–69
16.
FreyW, 1988, “The re-emergence of core region growth: A return to the metropolis?”International Regional Science Review11261–267
17.
GedikA, 2003, “Differential urbanization in Turkey: 1955–97”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie94100–112
18.
GeyerH, 1996, “Expanding the theoretical foundation of differential urbanization”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie8744–59
19.
GeyerH, 2003, “Differential urbanization in South Africa: A further exploration”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9490–100
20.
GeyerHKontulyT, 1993, “A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization”, in Regional Policy and Regional Integration Eds HansenNButtonKNijkampP (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 219–228
21.
GeyerHDu PlessisDGeyerHJrvan EedenA, 2012, Recent Migration Trends in South Africa—Updating the Differential Urbanization Concept (OECD. Paris) forthcoming
22.
GordonP, 1979, “Deconcentration without a ‘clean break’”Environment and Planning A11281–290
23.
GwebuT, 2006, “Towards a theoretical exploration of the differential urbanization model in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Botswana case”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie97418–433
24.
HarrisCUllmanE, 1945, “The nature of cities”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences2427–17
25.
HartT, 1983, “Transport and economic development, the historical dimension”, in Transport, Location and Spatial Policy Eds ButtonKGillingwaterD (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 12–22
26.
HeikkiläE, 2003, “Differential urbanization in Finland”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9449–63
27.
HoytH, 1939Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American CitiesFederal Housing Administration, Washington, DC
28.
HwangM, 1979, “A search for a development strategy for the capital region of Korea”, in Metropolitan Planning: Issues and Policies Eds RhoYHwangM (Korea Research for Human Settlements, Seoul) pp 3–32
29.
IsardW, 1972Location and Space-economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land-use, Trade, and Urban Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
30.
JohnsonD, 1986, “Suburban frontier: New settlers adjust”Special to the New York Times 30 April, page 3
31.
KontulyTDeardenB, 2003, “Testing the temporal characterisation of the differential urbanization model in West Germany, 1939–2010”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9465–75
32.
KontulyTGeyerH, 2003, “Lessons learned from testing the differential urbanization model”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie94124–128
33.
KrugmanP, 1991, “Increasing returns and economic geography”Journal of Political Economy99483–499
34.
LewisA, 1954, “Development with unlimited supplies of labour”The Manchester School22139–192
35.
LipietzA, 1997, “The post-Fordist world: Labour relations, international hierarchy and global ecology”Review of International Political Economy41–41
36.
LoFSalihK, 1979, “Growth poles, agropolitan development and polarization reversal: The debate and search for alternatives”, in Development from Above and Below? A Radical Reappraisal of Spatial Planning in Developing Countries Eds StöhrWTaylorD (John Wiley, New York) pp 123–152
37.
MeenGAndrewM, 2004, “On the use of policy to reduce housing market segmentation”Regional Science and Urban Economics34727–751
38.
MitchellC, 2004, “Making sense of counterurbanization”Journal of Rural Studies2215–34
39.
MookherjeeD, 2003, “Differential urbanization model: The case of a developing country, India 1961–1991”Journal of Social and Economic Geography9438–48
40.
MookherjeeDGeyerH, 2011, “Urban growth in the national capital region of India: Testing the differential urbanization model”Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geografie10288–99
41.
OttavianoGTabuchiTThisseJ, 2002, “Agglomeration and trade revisited”International Economic Review43409–435
42.
OuředníčekM, 2007, “Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region”Geografiska Annaler: Human Geography89B111–125
43.
PacioneM, 2010Urban Geography: A Global Perspective (Routledge, London)
44.
RanisGFeiJ, 1961, “A theory of economic development”The American Economic Review51533–565
45.
Republic of South Africa, 2011Diagnostic Overview (The Presidency, Pretoria)
46.
RichardsonH, 1973Regional Growth Theory (Macmillan, London)
47.
RichardsonH, 1977, “City size and national strategies in developing countries”, Staff Working Report, World Bank, Washington, DC
48.
RichardsonH, 1980, “Polarization reversal in developing countries”Papers of the Regional Science Association467–85
49.
ScottASojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
SimonD, 1989, “Crisis and change in South Africa: Implications for the apartheid city”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographer, New Series14189–206
52.
StaleyS, 1999, “The sprawling of America: In defense of the dynamic city”, Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study No. 251, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, CA
53.
TammaruT, 2000, “Differential urbanisation and primate city growth in Soviet and post-Soviet Estonia”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9120–30
54.
TammaruTKuluHKaskI, 2004, “Urbanization, suburbanization, and counterurbanization in Estonia”Eurasian Geography and Economics451212–1229
55.
TownroePKeenD, 1984, “Polarization reversal in the state of São Paulo, Brazil”Regional Studies1845–54
56.
VenablesA, 1996, “Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries”International Economic Review37341–359
57.
ViningDKontulyT, 1978, “Population dispersal from major metropolitan regions: An international comparison”International Regional Science Review349–73
58.
ViningDStraussA, 1977, “A demonstration that the current deconcentration of population in the United States is a clean break with the past”Environment and Planning A9751–758
59.
WestM, 1982, “From pass courts to deportation: Changing patterns of influx control in Cape Town”African Affairs81463–477
60.
YuZ, 2002, “Does immigration induce urban sprawl? A dynamic demographic analysis for the U.S.”Planning Forum841–62
