This paper examines the process through which a region was enacted and politically mobilized at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP10) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). We draw on concepts from scalar politics and new regional geography, data collected as part of a collaborative event ethnography of CoP10, and interviews with Palauan delegates to theorize the enactment of an oceanic Pacific Region as a scalar strategy directed toward transcending the practical and imagined smallness of Pacific small island developing states (SIDS) within the CoP10 meeting context and global imaginations. We conclude that the Pacific Region construct enhances Pacific SIDS' capacity to participate in CoP10, although their collective influence remains relatively limited compared with others. Most significantly, the Pacific Region imaginary of a vast ocean space and network of people committed to the CBD and biodiversity conservation positions Pacific Islanders to play a pivotal role in conserving a significant portion of the world's oceans. In the context of increasing global attention to marine conservation, the enactment of such a Pacific Region is likely to aid in attracting international recognition, attention, and support. By conveying how and why a diverse group of state and nonstate actors enacted an international and oceanic region at CoP10, we contribute understanding of strategic regionalization within the scalar politics literature and further disrupt understandings of an ontologically given, land-based region conceptualized on continental or subcontinental spatial scales.
BrosiusJPCampbellLM, 2010, “Collaborative event ethnography: Conservation and development trade-offs at the fourth world conservation congress”Conservation and Society8245–255
3.
BrownJCPurcellM, 2005, “There's nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon”Geoforum36607–624
4.
BulkeleyH, 2005, “Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks”Political Geography24875–902
5.
CampbellIC, 2003Worlds Apart (Canterbury University Press, Christchurch)
6.
ChasekPS, 2005, “Margins of power: Coalition building and coalition maintenance of the South Pacific Island States and the Alliance of Small Island States”Review of European Comunity and International Environmental Law14 (2) 125–138
7.
CorsonCGrubyRWitterRHagermanSSuarezDGreenburgSBourqueMGrayNCampbellLM, in press, “Everyone's solution? Defining and re-defining protected areas through the Convention on Biological Diversity”Conservation and Society
8.
CrocombeR, 2001The South Pacific (University of the South Pacific, Suva)
9.
DirlikA, 1998“The Asia-Pacific idea: Reality and representation in the invention of a regional structure”, in What is in a Rim? Ed. DirlikA, (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 15–36
10.
FischerSR, 2002A History of the Pacific Islands (Palgrave, New York)
11.
FisherDRGreenJF, 2004, “Understanding disenfranchisement: Civil society and developing countries' influence and participation in global governance for sustainable development”Global Environmental Politics465–84
12.
FrazerIBryan-TokalauJ, 2006, “Introduction: The uncertain future of pacific regionalism”, in Redefining the Pacific?: Regionalism Past, Present And Future Eds Bryant-TokalauJFrazerI, (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–23
13.
FryG, 1994, “Climbing back onto the map: The South Pacific Forum and the new development orthodoxy”Journal of Pacific History29 (3) 64–72
14.
FryI, 2005, “Small island developing states: Becalmed in a sea of soft law”Review of European Community and International Environmental Law14 (2) 89–99
15.
GrayNJ, 2010, “Sea change: Exploring the international effort to promote marine protected areas”Conservation and Society8331–338
16.
GrubyRLBasurtoX, in press, “Multi-level governance for large marine commons: Politics and polycentricity in Palau's protected area network”Environmental Science and Policy
17.
HagermanSWitterRCorsonCDanielSMaclinEMBourqueMCampbellL, 2012, “On the coattails of climate? Opportunities and threats of a warming Earth for biodiversity conservation”Global Environmental Change22724–735
18.
HajerMA, 2009Authoritative Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
19.
Hau'ofaE, 1998, “The ocean in us”The Contemporary Pacific10(2)
20.
Hau'ofaE, 2008We Are The Ocean: Selected Works (University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, HI)
21.
KeyJPeteruC, 2011, “Multilateral environmental agreements in the Pacific”Environmental Policy and Law41 (6) 288–291
22.
McCannEJ, 2003, “Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale”Journal of Urban Affairs25159–178
23.
McCarthyJ, 2005, “Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance”Antipode37731–753
24.
MacDonaldKICorsonC, 2012, “TEEB begins now': A virtual moment in the production of natural capital”Development and Change43159–184
25.
MansfieldB, 2001, “Thinking through scale: The role of state governance in globalizing North Pacific fisheries”Environment and Planning A331807–1827
26.
MarstonSA, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242
27.
MuniSD, 2005, “Regionalism in the Indian Ocean Region”, in Global Politics of Regionalism Eds FarrellMHettneBLangenhoveLV, (Pluto Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 252–266
28.
NeumannRP, 2009, “Political ecology: Theorizing scale”Progress in Human Geography33398–406
29.
NeumannRP, 2010, “Political ecology II: Theorizing region”Progress in Human Geography34368–374
30.
PaasiA, 2002, “Place and region: Regional worlds and views”Progress in Human Geography26802–811
31.
PaasiA, 2004“Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale”Progress in Human Geography28536–546
32.
PredA, 1984, “Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time; geography of becoming places”Annals of the Association of American Geographers74279–297
33.
SievanenLGrubyRLCampbellLM, 2013, “Fixing marine governance in Fiji? The new scalar narrative of ecosystem-based management”Global Environmental Change23206–216
34.
SilverJJ, 2008, “Weighing in on scale: Synthesizing disciplinary approaches to scale in the context of building interdisciplinary resource management”Society and Natural Resources21921–929
35.
SouthGRLowJ, 2008, “The Pacific Islands: Dynamics of regional cooperation on oceans and coasts”, in Securing the Oceans Eds Thia-EngCKullenbergGBongaD, (GEF/UNDP/IMO/Nippon Foundation, Quezon City) pp 563–595
36.
SneddonC, 2003, “Reconfiguring scale and power: The Khong-Chi-Mun project in northeast Thailand”Environment and Planning A352229–2250
37.
SPREP, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme2010, “Preparing the “One Pacific” for international biodiversity negotiations in October”, 19 August, http://www.sprep.org/article/news_detail.asp?ick815
SPREP, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme2011b, “Review of past Pacific performance at past international biodiversity conferences”, 18 May, http://www.sprep.org/article/news_detail.asp?id=927
SPREP, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme no date a, “Report on The 10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity Nagoya, Japan, on 18–29 October 2010”
