The intrametropolitan relationship between municipality-level physical environment and crime changes appears to have been overlooked by crime and environment researchers. The current effort focuses on permeability; suggests dynamics whereby permeability affects changing municipality-level crime patterns across a metropolitan area; selects and operationalizes theoretically appropriate permeability indicators; and links permeability to unexpected crime changes. Data are from 355 municipalities in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, and property and violent crime unexpected changes over two change periods are assessed. Three municipality-level indices reflecting internal and boundary permeability are developed that are internally consistent and cross reference in sensible ways with large-scale physical environment features of municipalities. Permeability indicators link as predicted with unexpected violent and property crime changes. This research provides a theoretical and empirical foundation for linking permeability to changing municipality-level crime rates across a metropolitan area.
AndresenMA, 2006, “Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity”British Journal of Criminology46258–285
2.
AndresenMA, 2007, “Location quotients, ambient populations, and the spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, Canada”Environment and Planning A392423–2444
3.
AnselinLReySJ, 1991, “Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models”Geographical Analysis23112–131
4.
AppleyardD, 1981Liveable Streets (University of California Press, Berkley, CA)
5.
ArmitageR, 2007, “Sustainability versus safety: Confusion, conflict and contradiction in designing out crime”, in Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease Eds FarrellGBowersKJJohnsonSDTownsleyM, (Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY) pp 81–110
6.
BaumerEP, 2008, “An empirical assessment of the contemporary crime trends puzzle”, in Understanding Crime Trends: Workshop ReportNational Research Council (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC) pp 211–241
7.
BaumerEPLauritsenJLRosenfeldRWrightR, 1998, “The Influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: A cross-city, longitudinal analysis”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency35316–340
8.
BeavonDJKBrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ, 1994, “The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses”, in Crime Prevention Studies Ed. ClarkeRV, (Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY) pp 115–148
9.
BernascoWBlockR, 2011, “Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency4833–57
10.
BevisCNutterJB, 1977, “Changing street layouts to reduce residential burglary”, American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA
11.
BlauJBlauP, 1982, “The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime”American Sociological Review47114–119
12.
BlockRDavisS, 1996, “The environs of a rapid transit station: A focus for street crime or just another risky place”, in Preventing Mass Transit Crime. Crime Prevention Studies Volume 6 Ed. ClarkeR, (Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY) pp 237–257
13.
BohrnstedtGW, 1969, “Observation on the measurement of change”, in Sociological Methodology Eds BorgattaEFBohrnstedtGW, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 113–133
14.
BowersKJJohnsonSDHirschfieldA, 2004, “Closing off opportunities for crime: An evaluation of alley-gating”European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research10285–308
15.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ, 1975, “Residential burglary and urban form”Urban Studies12104–125
16.
BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL, 1984Patterns in Crime (Macmillan, New York)
17.
BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL, 1991, “A further word 1991”, in Environmental Criminology Eds BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL, (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL) pp 239–255
18.
BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL, 1991 [1981] Environmental Criminology (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL)
19.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ, 1993, “Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime”, in Routine Activity and Rational Choice Eds ClarkeRVFelsonM, (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 259–294
20.
BrantinghamPJDyresonDABrantinghamPL, 1976, “Crime seen through a cone of resolution”American Behavioral Scientist20261–273
21.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJWongPS, 1991, “How public transit feeds private crime: Notes on the Vancouver ‘Skytrain’ experience”Security Journal291–95
22.
BrowneWJ, 2012a, “MCMC estimation in MLwiN”, University of Bristol Centre for Multilevel Modeling, Bristol
23.
BrowneWJ, 2012bMCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v. 2.13University of Bristol Centre for Multilevel Modeling, Bristol
BursikRJJGrasmickHG, 1993Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control (Lexington Books, Lexington MA)
27.
ClareJFernandezJMorganF, 2009, “Formal evaluation of the impact of barriers and connectors on residential burglars' macro-level offending location choices”Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology42139–158
28.
ClarkeRV, 2008, “Situational crime prevention”, in Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis Eds WortleyRMazerolleL, (Willan Publishing, Portland, OR) pp 178–194
CozensPM, 2008, “New urbanism, crime and the suburbs: A review of the evidence”Urban Policy and Research26429–444
31.
CozensPMLoveT, 2009, “Manipulating permeability as a process for controlling crime: Balancing security and sustainability in local contexts”Built Environment35346–365
32.
CromwellPFOlsonJNAvaryDW, 1991Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
33.
CrutchfieldRGeerkenMRGoveW, 1982, “Crime rates and social integration: The impact of metropolitan mobility”Criminology20467–478
34.
DonnellyPGMajkaTJ, 1998, “Residents' efforts at neighborhood stabilization: Facing the challenges of inner-city neighborhoods”Sociological Forum13189–214
35.
DoveyK, 2000, “Redistributing danger: Enclosure and encounter in urban design”Australian Planner3710–13
36.
EckJEWeisburdD, 1995, “Crime places in crime theory”, in Crime and Place Eds EckJEWeisburdD, (Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY) pp 1–33
FowlerEP, 1987, “Street management and city design”Social Forces66365–389
39.
FowlerEP, 1992Building Cities that Work (McGill–Queens University Press, Montreal)
40.
FowlerFJMangioneT, 1986, “A three pronged effort to reduce crime and fear of crime: The Hartford experiment”, in Community Crime Prevention Ed RosenbaumD, (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 87–108
41.
GiulianoGGordonPQishengPParkJ, 2010, “Accessibility and residential land values: Some tests with new measures”Urban Studies473103–3130
42.
GreenbergSWRoheWM, 1984, “Neighborhood design and crime: A test of two perspectives”Journal of the American Planning Association5048–60
43.
GreenbergSWRoheWMWilliamsJR, 1982, “Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods.”Population and Environment5141–165
44.
GrubesicTMackE, 2008, “Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime”Journal of Quantitative Criminology24285–306
HillierB, 2004, “Can streets be made safe?”Urban Design International931–45
53.
HillierBShuS, 2000, “Crime and urban layout: The need for evidence”, in Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety Eds BallintyneSPeaseKMcLarenV, (Institute for Public Policy Research, London) pp 224–248
54.
HippJR, 2007, “Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point”American Sociological Review72659–680
55.
HortonFEReynoldsDR, 1971, “Action space differentials in cities”, in Perspectives in Geography: Models of Spatial Interaction Eds McConnellHYaseenD, (Northern Illinois University Press, Dekab, IL) pp 83–102
56.
JacobsJ, 1961The Death and Life of Great American Cities. (Vintage Books, New York)
57.
JeppersonRMeyerJW, 2011, “Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms”Sociological Theory2954–73
58.
JohnsonSBowersK, 2010, “Permeability and burglary risk: Are cul-de-sacs safer?”Journal of Quantitative Criminology2689–111
59.
JonesMAFanekMF, 1997, “Crime in the urban environment”, in Proceedings of the First International Space Syntax Symposium (University College, London) pp 25.1–25.11
60.
LangfordIHLeylandAHRasbashJGoldsteinHDayRJMacdonaldAL, 1999, “Multilevel modeling of area-based health data, in Disease Mapping and Risk Assessment for Public Health Eds LawsonABBiggieriABoehningDLessafreEVielJBertolliiR, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 217–230
61.
LeckieGCharltonC, 2011runmlwin:Stata Module for Fitting Multilevel Models in the MLwiN Software PackageCentre for Multilevel Modeling, University of Bristol
62.
LevineNWachsM, 1986a, “Bus crime in Los Angeles: I-measuring the incidence”Transportation Research A20273–284
63.
LevineNWachsM, 1986b, “Bus crime in Los Angeles: II-victims and public impact”Transportation Research A20A285–293
64.
Loukaitou-SiderisA, 1999, “Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes”Journal of the American Planning Association65395–411
65.
LowSM, 2004Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America (Routledge, London)
66.
McCordESRatcliffeJH, 2009, “Intensity value analysis and the criminogenic effects of land use features on local crime patterns”Crime Patterns and Analysis217–30
67.
MessnerSFAnselinLBallerRD, 1999, “The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: An application of exploratory spatial data analysis”Journal of Quantitative Criminology15423–450
68.
Mirrlees-BlackCBuddTPatridgeSMayhewP, 1998, “The 1998 British Crime Survey: England and Wales” (Government Statistical Service, London)
69.
NewmanO, 1972Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (Macmillan, New York)
70.
NewmanO, 1996Creating Defensible SpaceUnited States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentWashington, DC
71.
ParkerKF, 2008Unequal Crime Decline (New York University Press, New York)
PepperJV, 2008, “Forecasting crime: A city-level analysis”, in Understanding Crime Trends: Workshop ReportNational Research Council (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC)
74.
PetersonRDKrivoLJ, 2005, “Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research”Annual Review of Sociology31331–356
75.
PetersonRDKrivoLJ, 2010Divergent Social Worlds: Neighborhood Crime and the Racial–Spatial Divide (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
76.
PrattTCCullenFT, 2005, “Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis”, in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research pp 373–450
77.
QueteletAJ, 1831 [1984] Research on the Propensity for Crime at Different Ages (Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH)
78.
RafteryAE, 1995, “Bayesian model selection in social research”Sociological Methodology25111–163
79.
RengertGFHakimS, 1998, “Burglary in affluent communities: A planning perspective”, in Reducing Crime through Real Estate Development and Management Ed. PeiserM F a RB, (Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC) pp 39–52
80.
RengertGFWasilchickJ, 1985Suburban Burglary: A Time and a Place for Everything (Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL)
81.
SampsonRJGrovesWB, 1989, “Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory”American Journal of Sociology94774–802
82.
ShawCRMcKayHD, 1942 [1969] Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
83.
ShihadehESFlynnN, 1996, “Segregation and crime: The effect of black social isolation on the rates of black urban violence”Social Forces741325–1352
84.
ShihadehESOuseyGC, 1996, “Metropolitan expansion and black social dislocation: The link between suburbanization and center-city crime”Social Forces75649–666
85.
ShuSHuangJ, 2003, “Spatial configuration and vulnerability of residential burglary: A case study of a city in Taiwan”, in 4th International Space Syntax Symposium (University College, London) pp 46.1–46.14
86.
SmithSJ, 1988, “Book review: ‘Metropolitan Crime Patterns’”British Journal of Criminology28547–549
87.
TaylorRB, 2002, “Physical environment, crime, fear, and resident-based control”, in Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control Eds WilsonJQPetersiliaJ, (Institute for Contemporary Studies, Oakland, CA) pp 413–434
88.
TaylorRB, 2005, “Crime prevention through environmental design: Yes, no, maybe, unknowable, and all of the above”, in Handbook of Environmental Psychology Eds BechtelRChurchmanA, (John Wiley, New York) pp 413–426
89.
TaylorRB, 2010, “Communities, crime, and reactions to crime multilevel models: Accomplishments and meta-challenges”Journal of Quantitative Criminology26455–466
90.
TaylorRBHarrellA, 1996, “Physical environment and crime” (National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC) pp 1–32
91.
TaylorRBGottfredsonSDBrowerSN, 1980, “The defensibility of defensible space”, in Understanding Crime Eds HirschiTGottfredsonM, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
92.
TaylorRBGroffEREleshDJohnsonL, 2012, “One-year look-ahead municipality crime predictions in a large metropolitan area” paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, November, copy available from the author
93.
US Census Bureau, 2011, “Cartographic boundary files descriptions and metadata”, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
94.
WeisburdDBruinsmaGBernascoW, 2009, “Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical development, critical issues and open questions”, in Putting Crime in its Place: Units of Analysis in Spatial Crime Research Eds WeisburdDBernascoWBruinsmaG, (Springer, New York) pp 3–31
95.
WhiteGF, 1990, “Neighborhood permeability and burglary rates”Justice Quarterly757–67
96.
WrightRTDeckerSH, 1997Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street Culture (Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA)
