This paper examines aspects of space consumption in two very different housing types: The communist mid-rise estates and postcommunist suburban self-built housing. Examining residents' perceptions in order to categorise space as overcrowded or underoccupied, the paper engages critically with the issue of the inefficient distribution of Romanian housing: that is, a considerable mismatch between dwelling and household size. The analysis documents the continued salience of overcrowding in the communist estates and, conversely, self-builders' satisfaction with the generous size of their new homes. Market forces permit various modes of residential mobility, but their likely outcome is growing housing inequality while any redistributive impact will remain insignificant unless policy incentives could facilitate conversion of underoccupied space into (social) renting housing. However, only a sustained delivery of larger and affordable new dwellings could alleviate overcrowding.
AndruszGHarloeMSzelenyiI, (Eds), 1996Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-socialist Societies (Blackwell, Oxford)
2.
BadescuGComsaMSanduDStanculescuM, 2007Barometrul de Opinie Publica-Octombrie 2007 (Fundatia Soros, Bucharest)
3.
BattenDC, 1999, “The mismatch argument: The construction of a housing orthodoxy in Australia”Urban Studies38137–151
4.
BenedekJ, 2006, “Urban policy and urbanisation in the transition Romania”Romanian Review of Regional Studies2 (1) 51–64
5.
BrattRG, 2002, “Housing and family well-being”Housing Studies1713–26
6.
BudisteanuI, 2005, “The long-lasting impacts of earlier housing policies on housing finance in Romania”, in Housing Finance: New and Old Models in Central Europe, Russia and Kazakhstan Eds HegedusJStruykRJ, (OSI, Budapest) pp 221–325
7.
ClaphamDFHegedusJKindreaKTosicsIKayH, (Eds), 1996Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe (Greenwood Press, London)
8.
ClaphamDFClarkWAVGibbK, (Eds), 2012The SAGE Handbook of Housing Studies (Sage, London)
9.
ClarkWAV, 2012, “Residential mobility and the housing market”, in The SAGE Handbook of Housing Studies Eds ClaphamDFClarkWAVGibbK, (Sage, London) pp 66–83
10.
DedaL, 2003, “The new housing market in Tirana”, in Housing Change in East and Central Europe: Integration or Fragmentation? Eds LoweSTsenkovaS, (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 171–180
11.
DolingJEisingaM, 2013Demographic Change and Housing Wealth: Home-owners, Pensions and Asset-based Welfare in Europe (Springer, London)
12.
DouglasM, 1991, “The idea of a home: A kind of space”Social Research58287–307
13.
DunnJR, 2000, “Housing and health”Housing Studies15341–366
14.
EasterlowDSmithSJ, 2004, “Housing for health: Can the market care?”Environment and Planning A36999–1017
15.
EC, 2011Key Figures on EuropeEuropean Commission (EU Publications, Luxembourg)
FearnJ, (Ed.), 2004Too Poor to Move, Too Poor to Stay: A Report on Housing in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia (OSI, Budapest)
20.
FehervaryK, 2011, “The materiality of the new family house in Hungary: Postsocialist fad or middle-class ideal?”City and Society23 (1) 18–41
21.
GoodchildBFurbeyR, 1986, “Standards in housing design: A review of the main changes since the Parker Morris report (1961)”Journal of Property Research3 (2) 79–99
22.
HegedusJStruykRJ, (Eds), 2005Housing Finance: New and Old Models in Central Europe, Russia and Kazakhstan (OSI, Budapest)
23.
HegedusJTosicsI, 1992, “Housing reform in Hungary”, in The Reform of Housing in Eastern Europe and Soviet Union Eds TurnerBHegedusJTosicsI, (Routledge, London) pp 151–178
24.
HegedusJLuxMTellerN, (Eds), 2012Social Housing in Transition Countries (Routledge, London)
25.
HirtSA, 2012Iron Curtains: Gates, Suburbs and Privatization of Space in the Post-socialist City (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, Sussex)
26.
ImrieR, 2004, “Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home”Housing Studies19745–763
27.
KemenyJ, 1992Housing and Social Theory (Routledge, London)
28.
KrisjaneZBerzinsM, 2012, “Post-socialist urban trends: New patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Riga, Latvia”Urban Studies49289–306
29.
LoweSTsenkovaS, 2003Housing Change in East and Central Europe: Integration or Fragmentation? (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
30.
MallettS, 2004, “Understanding home: A critical review of the literature”The Sociological Review5262–89
31.
MandicS, 2008, “Home-leaving and its structural determinants in western and eastern Europe: An exploratory study”Housing Studies23615–637
32.
MandicSCirmanA, 2011, “Housing conditions and their structural determinants: Comparisons within the enlarged EU”Urban Studies49777–793
33.
MDRT, 2012, “Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si a Turismului. Lucrari publice”, Bucharest, http://www.mdrt.ro
OurednicekM, 2007, “New suburban development in the post-socialist city: The case of Prague”Geografiska Annaler B89111–126
39.
PascariuSStanescuM, 2003, “Management improvement and quality standard challenges: Local government and housing in Romania”, in Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning? Ed. LuxM, (OSI, Budapest) pp 245–291
40.
RG, 1996, “Legea 114: Legea locuintei”, in Monitorul Oficial 254Romanian Government, Bucharest
41.
RonnasP, 1984Urbanization in Romania: A Geography of Economic and Social Change Since Independence (Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm)
42.
RuoppilaSKahrikA, 2003, “Socio-economic residential differentiation in post-socialist Tallinn”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment18 (1) 49–73
43.
SillinceJ, (Ed.), 1990Housing Policies in Eastern Europe and Soviet Union (Routledge, London)
44.
SoaitaAM, 2010Unregulated Housing Privatism PhD thesis, Department of Geography, King's College London
45.
SoaitaAM, 2013, “Romanian suburban housing: Home improvement through owner-building”Urban Studies502084–2101
46.
StanilovK, (Ed.), 2007The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism (Springer, Dordrecht)
47.
StruykRJ, 1996Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing (The Urban Institute, Washington, DC)
48.
SykoraLBouzarovskiS, 2012, “Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition”Urban Studies4943–60
49.
SzelenyiI, 1983Urban Inequalities under State Socialism (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
50.
TsenkovaS, 2009Housing Policy Reforms in Post-socialist Europe: Lost in Transition (Physica, Heidelberg)
51.
UNECE, 2001Countries Profiles on the Housing Sector: RomaniaUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva
52.
van KempenRDekkerKHallSTosicsI, (Eds), 2005Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe (Policy Press, Bristol)
53.
YatesJ, 2012, “Housing subsidies”, in The SAGE Handbook of Housing Studies Eds ClaphamDFClarkWAVGibbK, (Sage, London) pp 397–418
