Complexity: Policymakers' Divider and Possible Conqueror

Abstract

It is argued that acknowledgement of complexity is followed by feelings of helplessness which generate three distinct policymaking styles. These three, labelled analytical abdication, analytical alchemy, and analytical addiction, are outlined in terms of their logical bases, strengths, and weaknesses.

A natural tendency for the emphasis of fashion to oscillate between all three, in order to speed progress towards greater understanding, is demonstrated, and its inhibition by policymakers' general intolerance towards work based on viewpoints radically different from their own is criticised. More tolerance towards useful features of each approach is thus suggested as the best tactic against the growing complexity problem.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

, 1964 Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass)

Angel

Hyman

G M

, 1970

“Urban velocity fields”

Environment and Planning 2 211–224

Arrow

K J

, 1958

“Utilities, attitudes, choices: A review note”

Econometrica 26 1–23

Berge

, 1968 Principles of Combinatorics (Academic Press, New York)

Bolan

R S

, 1967

“Emerging views of planning”

Journal of the American Institute of Planners 33 233–245

Cleveland City Planning Commission, 1975 Cleveland Policy Planning Report (extensively reviewed in Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41 298–318)

Coxeter

H S M

, 1962 Introduction to Geometry (John Wiley, New York)

Dreyfus

H L

, 1972 What Computers Can't Do (Harper and Row, New York)

Feigenbaum

E A

Feldman

(Eds), 1963 Computers and Thought (McGraw-Hill, New York)

10.

Finsterbusch

Wolf

C P

(Eds), 1977 Methodology of Social Impact Analysis (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsberg, Pa)

11.

Forrester

J W

, 1969 Urban Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass)

12.

Freedman

J L

, 1975 Crowding and Behaviour (Viking, New York)

13.

Gips

, 1979

“Artificial intelligence”

Environment and Planning B 6 353–364

14.

Hirschman

A O

Lindblom

C E

, 1969 “Economic development, research and development, policy making: Some converging views” in A Sociological Reader of Complex Organizations Ed. Etzioni

(Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)

15.

Koberg

, 1974 The Universal Traveller (William Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif.)

16.

La Porte

T R

(Ed.), 1975 Organized Social Complexity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)

17.

Lee

, 1973 Models in Planning (Pergamon Press, Oxford)

18.

Levy

, 1976 Chess and Computers (Batsford, London)

19.

Lindblom

C E

, 1959

“The science of ‘muddling through’”

Public Administration Review 19 79–88

20.

Rapoport

Kantor

R E

, 1967

“Complexity and ambiguity in environmental design”

Journal of American Institute of Planners 33 210–221

21.

Rittel

H W

Webber

M M

, 1974

“Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”

Design Research and Methods, DMG-DRS Journal 8 31–39; also in 1973 Policy Sciences 4 155–169

22.

Samuels

A L

, 1963 “Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers” in Computers and Thought Eds Feigenbaum

E A

Feldman

(McGraw-Hill, New York)

23.

Slagle

J R

, 1971 Artificial Intelligence: The Heuristic Programming Approach (McGraw-Hill, New York)

24.

Sloman

, 1978 The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, Science and Models of Mind (Harvester, Hassocks, Sussex)

25.

Thring

M W

, 1974 “Machines for a creative society” in Man-Made Futures Eds Cross

Elliott

Roy

(Hutchinson, London) pp 302–310

26.

Toffler

, 1974 “Future shock” in Man-Made Futures Eds Cross

Elliott

Roy

(Hutchinson, London) pp 39–48

27.

Vacca

, 1974 The Coming Dark Age (Anchor, New York)

28.

Wyatt

, 1975 “Shortest routes without networks” Geographical Paper 33, Department of Geography, University of Reading, Reading, Berks.