In this paper the author reflects on his experience as both theorist and practitioner in Canadian planning. The lack of any rigorous theoretical underpinning for planning practice is identified. Three reasons for this are advanced: the inhibiting effect of daily practice, the lack of any real discourse between theorists and practitioners and, most importantly, the prevalence of antipolitical planning ideologies. In an attempt to counteract the mystifying and deleterious effects of these ideologies, the author proposes a theoretical framework designed both to bridge the theory-practice chasm and to restore the lost nexus between planning and social justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
• References not specifically quoted in the text but of particular relevance to this paper.
2.
AIP, 1971Code of Professional Responsibility and Rules of ProcedureAmerican Institute of Planners, Washington, DC
3.
AltshulerA, 1965a, “Goals of comprehensive planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners31186–194
4.
AltshulerA, 1965bThe City Planning Process: A Political Analysis (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
5.
BanfieldE, 1959, “Ends and means in planning”International Social Sciences Journal11361–386
6.
BanfieldE CWilsonJ Q, 1966City Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
7.
BaumH A, 1980, “The uncertain consciousness of planners and the professional enterprise”Plan Canada2039–53
8.
BeauregardR, 1978, “Resolving tensions: Planning theory about and for local planners” in The Structural Crisis of the 1970's and Beyond Proceedings of a conference on planning theory at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
9.
BeauregardR, 1979, “Planning in an advanced capitalist state” in Planning Theory in the 1980s Eds BurchellR WSternliebG, (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 235–254
10.
BenevoloL, 1967The Origins of Modern Town Planning (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Henley-on-Thames, Oxon)
11.
BranchM C, 1959, “Comprehensive planning: A new field of study”Journal of the American Institute of Planners25115–120
CastellsM, 1978City, Class and Power (Macmillan, London)
14.
ChadwickG, 1971A Systems View of Planning (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
15.
CherryG E, 1974The Evolution of British Town Planning (Leonard Hill, distributed by International Textbook Co., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow)
16.
ClarkR, 1976, “The crisis in Canadian city planning”City Magazine117–26
17.
DahrendorfR, 1969, “Toward a theory of social conflict” in Sociological Theory Ed. WallaceW L, (Aldine, Chicago, IL) pp 213–227
18.
DavidoffP, 1965, “Advocacy and pluralism in planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners31331–337
19.
DavidoffP, 1975, “Working towards redistributve justice”Journal of the American Institute of Planners41317–319
20.
EversleyD, 1973The Planner in Society (Faber and Faber, London)
21.
FaludiA, 1973Planning Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 105–126 and pp 150–171
22.
ForesterJ, 1980, “Critical theory and planning practice”Journal of the American Planning Association46275–286
23.
ForesterJ, 1981, “Questioning and organizing attention: Towards a critical theory of planning and administrative practice”Administration and Society13161–205
24.
ForesterJ, 1982a, “Know your organizations: Planning and the reproduction of social and political relations”Plan Canada223–13
25.
ForesterJ, 1982b, “Planning in the face of power”Journal of the American Planning Association4867–80
26.
• FriedmannJ, 1971. “The future of comprehensive planning”Public Administration Review31315–327.
27.
FriedmannJ, 1973, “The public interest and community participation: Toward a reconstruction of public philosophy”Journal of the American Institute of Planners394–7
28.
GansH, 1973, “Commentary on Friedmann on the public interest”Journal of the American Institute of Planners393–5
29.
GereckeK, 1976, “The history of Canadian city planning”City Magazine212–23
30.
GoodmanR, 1971After the Planners (Simon and Schuster, New York)
HealeyP, 1983, “Rational method as a mode of policy formation and implementation in land-use policy”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1019–39
34.
HeldD, 1980Introduction to Critical Theory (Hutchinson, London)
35.
HoweEKaufmanJ, 1979, “The ethics of contemporary American planners”Journal of the American Planning Association45243–255
36.
HudsonB M, 1979, “Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions”Journal of the American Planning Association45387–398
37.
KaufmanJ, 1979, “The planner as interventionist in public policy issues” in Planning Theory in the 1980s Eds BurchellR WSternliebG, (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 179–200
38.
KempR, 1980, “Planning, legitimation, and the development of nuclear energy: A critical theoretic analysis of the Windscale inquiry”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research4350–371
39.
KentT J, 1964The Urban General Plan (Chandler, San Francisco, CA)
40.
KiernanM, 1982, “The fallacy of planning law reform”Urban Law and Policy5173–251
41.
KiernanM, 1983, “The politics of quiescence: The ‘reform’ experience in Winnipeg” in City Politics in Canada Eds SanctonAMagnussonW, (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) pp 224–254
42.
KlostermanR E, 1978, “Foundations for normative planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners4437–45
43.
KlostermanR E, 1980, “A public interest criterion”Journal of the American Planning Association46323–333
44.
KrumholzN, 1982, “A retrospective view of equity planning: Cleveland 1969–1979”Journal of the American Planning Association48163–178
45.
KrumholzNCoggerJLinnerJ, 1975, “The Cleveland policy planning report”Journal of the American Institute of Planners41298–304
46.
LindblomC E, 1959, “The science of muddling through”Public Administration Review1979–89
47.
LojkineJ, 1976, “Contribution to a Marxist theory of capitalist urbanization” in Urban Sociology: Critical Essays Ed. PickvanceC, (Tavistock Publications, Andover, Hants) pp 119–146
48.
McAuslanPCameronD CMillarD, 1977a, “Commentary on ‘the future of planning’”Town Planning Review48233–246
49.
McAuslanPCameronD CMillarD, 1977b, “Commentary on ‘the future of planning’”Town Planning Review48354–372
50.
McCarthyT, 1978The Critical Theory of Jurgan Habermas (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
51.
McLoughlinJ B, 1969Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach (Faber and Faber, London)
52.
MeyersonM, 1956, “Building the middle-range bridge for comprehensive planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners2258–64
53.
MeyersonMBanfieldE C, 1955Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest (Free Press, New York)
54.
O'ConnorJ, 1973The Fiscal Crisis of the State (St James Press, London)
55.
PageJLangR, 1977Canadian Planners in Profile initial finding of the Environmental Planning in Canada Research presented to Annual Meeting of Canadian Institute of Planners (Toronto), Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Ontario, Canada
56.
PahlR, 1977, “Managers, technical experts, and the state: Forms of mediation, manipulation, and dominance in urban and regional development” in Captive Cities Ed. HarloeM, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 49–60
57.
PivenF F, 1975, “Planning and class interests”Journal of the American Institute of Planners41308–310
58.
PoulantzasN, 1969, “The problem of the capitalist state”New Left Review5867–78
59.
RawlsJ, 1967a, “A theory of justice” in Justice and Economic Distribution Eds ArthurJShawW H, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 18–52
60.
RawlsJ, 1967b, “Distributive justice” in Philosophy, Politics, and Society Eds LaslettPRuncimanW, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 57–62
61.
RawlsJ, 1971A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
62.
RTPI, 1976Planning and the Future (Royal Town Planning Institute, London)
