In this paper we investigate variations in the adoption of LEED-certified commercial buildings across 174 core-based statistical areas in the United States. Drawing upon a unique database and using a robust analytical framework, the determinants of the proportion LEED-certified space are modeled. We find that, despite high growth rates, LEED-certified stock accounts for a relatively small proportion of the total commercial stock. The average proportion is less than 1%. A further contribution of the paper is that our concentration measure avoids the biases associated with simple percentage measures that were used in previous studies of this topic. Strongest predictors of the proportion of LEED-certified commercial space in a local market are market size, educational attainment and economic growth. In terms of policy effectiveness, it is found that only a mandatory requirement to obtain LEED certification for new buildings has a significant positive effect on market penetration.
AchenC, 1986The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-experiments (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
2.
AudretschD BFeldmanM P, 1996, “Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”American Economic Review86630–640
3.
BartikT, 1985, “Business location decisions in the United States: Estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics314–22
CaoXPrakashA, 2011, “Growing exports by signaling product quality: Trade competition and the cross-national diffusion of ISO 9000 quality standards”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30111–135
6.
ChengSStoughR, 2006, “Location decisions of Japanese new manufacturing plants in China: A discrete-choice analysis”The Annals of Regional Science40369–387
7.
ChoiE, 2010, “Green on buildings: The effects of municipal policy on green building designations in America's central cities”Journal of Sustainable Real Estate21–21
8.
CoughlinCSegevE, 2000, “Location determinants of new foreign-owned manufacturing plants”Journal of Regional Science40323–351
9.
DeCosterGStrangeW, 1993, “Spurious agglomeration”Journal of Urban Economics33273–304
10.
DurantonGOvermanH, 2005, “Testing for localisation using micro-geographic data”Review of Economic Studies721077–1106
11.
EichholtzPKokNQuigleyJ, 2009, “Why do companies rent green? A model of ecological responsiveness”Academy of Management Journal434717–737
FuerstF, 2009, “Building momentum: An analysis of investment trends in LEED and energy star-certified properties”Journal of Retail and Leisure Property823–32
14.
HeckmanJ, 1979, “Sample selection bias as a specification. Error”Econometrica47153–161
15.
ImbensG, 2004. “Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review”The Review of Economics and Statistics864–29
16.
JaffeAStavinsR, 1994, “The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology”Resource and Energy Economics1691–122
17.
JaffeANewellRStavinsR, 2005, “A tale of two market failures—technology and environmental policy”Ecological Economics54164–174
18.
KahnMVaughnR, 2009, “Green market geography: The spatial clustering of hybrid vehicles and LEED registered buildings. Contributions in economic policy”The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy9(2) 1–24
19.
KokNMcGrawMQuigleyJ, 2011, “The diffusion of energy efficiency in building”American Economic Review101(3) 77–82
20.
KontokostaC E, 2011, “Greening the regulatory landscape: The spatial and temporal diffusion of green building policies in US cities”Journal of Sustainable Real Estate368–90
21.
KrugmanP, 1993), “First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location”Journal of Regional Science33129–144
OakleyD, 2008, “Locational patterns of low-income housing tax credit developments: A sociospatial analysis of four metropolitan areas”Urban Affairs Review43599–629
24.
PapkeLWooldridgeJ, 1996, “Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401k plan participation rates”Journal of Applied Ecology11619–632
25.
PrakashAPotoskiM, 2012, “Voluntary environmental programs: A comparative perspective”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management31123–138
26.
RoheWFreemanL, 2001, “Assisted housing and residential segregation: The role of race and ethnicity in siting of assisted housing developments”Journal of the American Planning Association67279–292
27.
SanstadAHanemannMAuffhammerM, 2006, “End-use energy efficiency in a post-carbon' California economy: Policy issues and research frontiers”, in Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California Eds FarrellA EHanemannW M (The Energy Foundation, San Francisco, CA) chapter 6
28.
SimcoeTToffelM, 2011, “LEED adopters: Public procurement and private consumption”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Denver, CO, January
29.
SimonsRChoiESimonsD, 2009, “The effect of state and city green policies on the market penetration of green commercial buildings”Journal of Sustainable Real Estate1139–169
30.
SmithDFloridaR, 1994, “Agglomeration and industrial location: An econometric analysis of Japanese-affiliated manufacturing establishments in automotive-related industries”Journal of Urban Economics3623–41
