Although information has been used as a strategy to influence short-term travel behavior, there is a paucity of research on whether information can result in long-term behavioral changes. To examine the impact of providing information on location choices and travel behaviors we used an experimental design with a sample of incoming students at two area universities. Information was administered to individuals in the experimental group before they selected a residential location in the area. With a survey, we collected information on residential locations and travel behaviors from all participants six months after the intervention. Students in the intervention group from one university traveled between 50% and 68% fewer km/day by automobile, located closer to the university, and located in areas with more transit stops than students in the control group. Information appears to be a promising strategy for influencing location decisions and prompting travel behavior change.
BergNHoffrageU, 2008, “Rational ignoring with unbounded cognitive capacity”Journal of Economic Psychology29792–809
6.
BhatC RGuoJ, 2004, “A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling”Transportation Research Part B—Methodological38147–168
7.
ChapmanG BJohnsonE J, 2002, “Incorporation the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value”, in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement Eds GilovichTGriffinD WKahnemanD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 120–138
8.
ChorusC GArentzeT AMolinE J ETimmermansH J PVan WeeB, 2006, “The value of travel information: Decision strategy-specific conceptualizations and numerical examples”Transportation Research Part B—Methodological40504–519
9.
ClarkW A VSmithT R, 1982, “Housing-market search behavior and expected utility theory: 2. The process of search”Environment and Planning A14717–737
10.
CooperC, 2007, “Successfully changing individual travel behavior applying community-based social marketing to travel choice”Transportation Research Record number 2021, 89–99
EwingRCerveroR, 2010, “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis”Journal of the American Planning Association76265–294
13.
FischerPMalmbergG, 2001, “Settled people don't move: On life course and (im)mobility in Sweden”International Journal of Population Geography7357–371
14.
ForsythAOakesMSchmitzKHearstM, 2007, “Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity?”Urban Studies44679–697
15.
GarlandH CHaynesJ JGrubbG C, 1979, “Transit map color coding and street detail—effects on trip planning performance”Environment and Behavior11162–184
16.
GuoZ, 2011, “Mind the map! The impact of transit maps on path choice in public transit”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45625–639
17.
HogarthR MRederM W, 1987Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
18.
HuffJ O, 1986, “Geographic regularities in residential search behavior”Annals of the Association of American Geographers76208–227
19.
HurdR M, 1903Principles of City Land Value (The Record and Guide, New York)
20.
KenyonEHeathS, 2001, “Choosing this life: Narratives of choice amongst house sharers”Housing Studies16619–635
21.
KimJ HPagliaraFPrestonJ, 2005, “The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour”Urban Studies421621–1636
22.
LevineJInamATorngG W, 2005, “A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives—evidence from Boston and Atlanta”Journal of Planning Education and Research24317–330
23.
LindstromB, 1997, “A sense of place: Housing selection on Chicago's North Shore”Sociological Quarterly3819–39
24.
MahmassaniHHermanR, 1984, “Dynamic user equilibrium departure time and route choice on idealized traffic arterials”Transportation Science18362–384
25.
MolinEOppewalHTimmermansH, 1999, “Group-based versus individual-based conjoint preference models of residential preferences: A comparative test”Environment and Planning A311935–1947
26.
MuthR F, 1969Cities and Housing; The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
27.
PagliaraFPrestonJSimmondsD, 2010, “Conclusions”, in Residential Location Choice: Models and Applications (Springer, Berlin) pp 243–248
28.
PalmRDanisM, 2001, “The impacts of web-based information on the search process and spatial housing choice patterns”Urban Geography22641–655
29.
PheH HWakelyP, 2000, “Status, quality and the other trade-off: Towards a new theory of urban residential location”Urban Studies377–35
30.
PrashkerJShiftanYHershkovitch-SarusiP, 2008, “Residential choice location, gender and the commute trip to work in Tel Aviv”Journal of Transport Geography16332–341
31.
RaveauSMunozJ Cde GrangeL, 2011, “A topological route choice model for metro”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45138–147
32.
RodriguezD AEvensonK RRouxDiez A VBrinesS J, 2009, “Land use, residential density, and walking. The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis”American Journal of Preventative Medicine37397–404
33.
RodriguezD ALevineJAgrawalA WSongJ M, 2011, “Can information promote transportation-friendly location decisions? A simulation experiment”Journal of Transport Geography19304–312
34.
SavageMBagnallGLonghurstB, 2005Globalization and Belongings (Sage, London)
35.
SchwanenTMokhtarianP L, 2004, “The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31759–784
36.
SimonH A, 1997Models of Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
37.
SimonH ADantzigG BHogarthRPlottC RRaiffaHSchellingT CShepsleK AThalerRTverskyAWinterS, 1987, “Decision-making and problem-solving”Interfaces1711–31
38.
SimonsohnU, 2006, “New Yorkers commute more everywhere: Contrast effects in the field”Review of Economics and Statistics881–9
39.
SlovicP, 2002, “The affect heuristic”, in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement Eds GilovichTGriffinD WKahnemanD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 397–420
40.
StringerMCornishI MFinlayC, 1991, “Strength of group identity and locational preference in Northern Ireland”Journal of Social Psychology131743–745
41.
Toussaint-ComeauMRhineS L W, 2004, “Tenure choice with location selection: The case of Hispanic neighborhoods in Chicago”Contemporary Economic Policy2295–110
42.
VerplankenBAartsHvan KnippenbergA, 1997, “Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices”European Journal of Social Psychology27539–560
43.
WaddellPBorningANorthMFreierNBeckeMUlfarssonG, 2003, “Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: Design and implementation of UrbanSim”Networks and Spatial Economics343–67
44.
YagoG, 1983, “The sociology of transportation”Annual Review of Sociology9171–190
