A discrete choice model is presented of travelers' decisions whether or not to use different forms of ICT (travel information and teleworking) in the context of risky travel times and arrival time constraints. The model is estimated on data from two travel simulator experiments. One experiment featured a reward which was related to participants' choices (implying a so-called induced-preference approach). The other experiment featured a fixed participation fee (a stated-preference approach). Results suggest that the developed model succeeds in capturing subtle behaviors related to the use of ICT; evidence for the usefulness of the induced-preference approach is mixed, at best.
AlexanderBHubersCSchwanenTDijstMEttemaD, 2011, “Anything, anywhere, anytime? Developing indicators to assess the spatial and temporal fragmentation of activities”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38678–705
2.
Ben-EliaEErevIShiftanY, 2008, “The combined effect of information and experience on drivers' route-choice behavior”Transportation35165–177
3.
BierlaireM, 2003, “BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models”, in Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference. Ascona, Switzerlandhttp://www.strc.ch/conferences/2003/bierlaire.pdf
BierlaireMHurtubiaRFlötterödG, 2010, “Analysis of implicit choice set generation using a constrained multinomial logit model”Transportation Research Record number 2175, 92–97
6.
BonsallP, 2004, “Route choice simulators”, in Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks Eds SchreckenbergMSeltenR (Springer, Berlin) pp 167–191
7.
CamererC FHogarthR M, 1999, “The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital—labor—production framework”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty197–42
8.
CastroMMartínezFMunizagaM, 2012, “Estimation of a constrained multinomial logit model”Transportation40563–581
9.
ChorusC GArentzeT AMolinE J ETimmermansH J P, 2005, “Value of travel information: Theoretical framework and numerical examples”Transportation Research Record number 1926, 142–151
10.
ChorusC GMolinE J EArentzeT AHoogendoornS PTimmermansH J PVan WeeG P, 2007, “Validation of a multimodal travel simulator with travel information provision”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies15191–207
11.
ChorusC GArentzeT ATimmermansH J P, 2009, “Traveler compliance with advice: A Bayesian utilitarian perspective”Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review45486–500
12.
ChorusC GWalkerJ LBen-AkivaM E, 2013, “A joint model of travel information acquisition and response to received messages”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies2661–77
13.
DavisD DHoltC A, 1993Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
14.
Denant-BoèmontLPetiotR, 2003, “Information value and sequential decision-making in a transport setting: An experimental study”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological37365–386
15.
EttemaDTimmermansH, 2006, “Costs of travel time uncertainty and benefits of travel time information: Conceptual model and numerical examples”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies14335–350
16.
FaragSWeltervredenJvan RietbergenTDijstM, 2006, “E-shopping in the Netherlands: Does geography matter?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3359–74
17.
HarrisonG WRutströmE E, 2009, “Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral”Experimental Economics12133–158
18.
HessSTrainK EPolakJ W, 2006, “On the use of a modified latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological40147–163
19.
KagelJ HRothA E, 1995The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
20.
LuRChorusCVan WeeG P, 2014, “The effects of different forms of ICT on accessibility—a behavioural model and numerical examples”Transportmetrica10233–254
21.
MahmassaniH S, 2006, “Learning from interactive experiments: Travel behavior and complex system dynamics”, in The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research Eds KitamuraRYoshiiTYamamotoT (Emerald, Bingley, W Yorks) pp 131–156
22.
MartínezFAguilaFHurtubiaR, 2009, “The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological43365–377
23.
MokhtarianP L, 1990, “A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation”Transportation Research Part A: General24231–242
24.
SalomonI, 1986, “Telecommunications and travel relationships: A review”Transportation Research Part A: General20223–238
25.
SmithV L, 1976, “Experimental economics: Induced value theory”The American Economic Review66274–279
26.
Van WeeG PChorusC GGeursK T, 2013, “ICT, travel behavior and accessibility: A review of literature, a conceptual model and a research agenda”Journal of Transport and Land Use61–16
27.
ZiegelmeyerAKoesslerFMyK BDenant-BoèmontL, 2008, “Road traffic congestion and public information: An experimental investigation”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy4243–82
