One of the principle criticisms of urban sprawl is that it undermines the cost-effective provision of public services. In this paper the authors examine whether or not this is true through an exploratory analysis of the influence that alternative development patterns have on twelve measures of public expenditure: total direct, capital facilities, roadways, other transportation, sewerage, trash collection, housing and community development, police protection, fire protection, parks, education, and libraries. The objectives of the analysis are threefold. First, the authors, through a background discussion, provide a brief overview of previous research on the relationship between urban development patterns and the cost of public services. Second, through empirical analysis, they examine how the character of urban development affects per capita public outlays in a cross-section of 283 metropolitan counties during the 1982–92 time period. A separate equation is estimated for each measure of expenditure, providing substantive evidence on how density, the spatial extent of urbanized land area, property value, and political fragmentation affect the cost of services. Finally, the authors use the results of the empirical analysis to develop a set of policy recommendations and directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertiM, 1999, “Urban patterns and environmental performance: What do we know?”Journal of Planning Education and Research19151–163
2.
AltshulerAGoméz-IbäñezJ, 1993Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
3.
BahlR, 1968, “A land speculation model: The role of the property tax as a constraint to urban sprawl”Journal of Regional Science8199–208
4.
BruecknerJ, 2000, “Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies”International Regional Science Review23160–171
5.
BurchellR, 1998Transportation Cooperative Research Program Report 39: The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
6.
CarruthersJ, 2002a, “Evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs: An analytical framework”Journal of Planning Education and Research21406–420
7.
CarruthersJ, 2002b, “The impacts of state growth management programs: A comparative analysis”Urban Studies391959–1982
8.
CarruthersJ, 2003, “Growth at the fringe: The impact of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas”Papers in Regional Science84 forthcoming
9.
CarruthersJUlfarssonG, 2002, “Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis”Growth and Change33312–340
10.
ClawsonM, 1962, “Urban sprawl and speculation in suburban land”Land Economics3899–111
11.
DowdingK P JBiggsS, 1994, “Tiebout: A survey of the empirical literature”Urban Studies31767–798
12.
DownsA, 1994New Visions for Metropolitan America (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
13.
DownsA, 1999, “Some realities about sprawl and decline”Housing Policy Debate10955–974
14.
EwingR, 1997, “Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?”Journal of the American Planning Association63107–126
15.
FischelW, 1985The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
16.
FosterK, 1997The Political Economy of Special Purpose Government (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC)
17.
FrankJ, 1989The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature (The Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC)
18.
GalsterGHansonRRatcliffeMWolmanHColemanSFreihageJ, 2001, “Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept”Housing Policy Debate12681–717
19.
GordonPRichardsonH, 1997, “Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association6395–106
20.
KaiserEGodschalkDChapinS, 1995Urban Land Use Planning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
21.
KellyE, 1993Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts (Praeger, Westport)
22.
KennedyP, 1998A Guide to Econometrics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
KnaapGNelsonA, 1992The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning From Oregon (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
24.
LaddH, 1992, “Population growth, density, and the costs of providing public services”Urban Studies29273–295
25.
LaddH, 1994, “Fiscal impacts of local population growth: A conceptual and empirical analysis”Regional Science and Urban Economics24661–686
26.
LaddH, 1998, “Land use regulation as a fiscal tool”, in Local Government Tax and Land Use Policies in the United States: Understanding the Links Ed. LaddH (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) pp 55–74
27.
LaddHYingerJ, 1991America's Ailing Cities: Fiscal Health and the Design of Urban Policy (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
28.
LeeD, 1981, “Land use planning as a response to market failure”, in The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States Ed. de NeufvilleJ (Plenum Press, New York) pp 149–164
29.
LewisP, 1996Shaping Suburbia: How Political Institutions Organize Urban Development (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA)
30.
LynchK, 1981Theory of Good City Form (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
NelsonADuncanJMullenCBishopK, 1995Growth Management: Principles and Practices (Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL)
32.
PendallR, 1999, “Do land-use controls cause sprawl?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26555–571
33.
PorterD, 1997Managing Growth in America's Communities (Island Press, Washington, DC)
34.
REIS, various years Regional Economic Information SystemGeospatial and Statistical Data Center, University of Virginia, http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/reis/
35.
RERC, 1974The Costs of Sprawl: Environmental and Economic Costs of Alternative Residential Development Patterns at the Urban Fringe Real Estate Research Corporation (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC)
36.
ShenQ, 1996, “Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2361–91
37.
SpeirCStephensonK, 2002, “Does sprawl cost us all? Isolating the effects of housing patterns on public water and sewer costs”Journal of the American Planning Association6856–70
38.
TalenEEllisC, 2002, “Beyond relativism: Reclaiming the search for good city form”Journal of Planning Education and Research2236–49
39.
TieboutC, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
40.
USCG, various years a Government Organization, Volume 1, Number 1 US Census of Governments (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
41.
USCG, various years b Assessed Valuations for Local General Property Taxation, Volume 2, Number 1 US Census of Governments (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
42.
USCG, various years c Compendium of Government Finances, Volume 4, Number 5 US Census of Governments (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
USDA, 2002, “1997 National Resources Inventory (NRI)”, US Department of Agriculture; machine-readable data, available on CD-ROM, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, PO Box 6567, Fort Worth, TX 76115–0567
