A relationship between human preferences for physical properties of visual texture is established in this paper. The author asks whether there is a measurable correlation between aesthetic ratings for textural images and their physical properties. A bank of Gabor filters covering a range of frequencies and orientations are used to extract properties. Three studies are conducted and the correlations between aesthetic ratings and the properties were significant and large. The correlations proved robust when image identifiability was incorporated in the first and third studies and removed from the second study. In this, it is suggested that memory and association are not exclusively driving (aesthetic) preference; that it is also tuned to properties of spatial frequency and orientation of certain visual stimuli.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtD GGeislerW S, 1997, “Visual cortext neurons in monkeys and cats: Detection, discrimination, and identification”Visual Neuroscience14897–919
AmadasunMKingR, 1989, “Textural features corresponding to textural properties”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics191264–1274
4.
ArgentiFAlparoneIBenelliG, 1990, “Fast algorithms for texture analysis using co-occurrence matrices”IEEE Proceedings for Radar and Signal Processing137443–448
5.
ArnheimR, 1969Visual Thinking (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
ArnheimR, 1974, “Form”, in Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 96–162; first published 1974
7.
BeardsleeD CWertheimerM, 1958, “Principles of perceptual oganization”, in Readings in Perception (D. Van Nostrand, New York) pp 115–135
8.
BenediktM, 2001, “Reclaiming the science of forgotten phenomena”, in A General Theory of Value (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) chapter 10
9.
BovikA CClarkM, 1989, “Experiments in segmenting texton patterns using localized spatial filters”Pattern Recognition22707–717
10.
BovikA CClarkMGeislerW S, 1990, “Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence12(1) 55–73
11.
BrodatzP, 1956Texture: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers (Dover, New York)
12.
CampbellF W, 1974, “The transmission of spatial information through the visual system”, in The Neurosciences Third Study Program Eds SchmittF OWordenF G (MIT Press, Boston, MA) pp 95–103
13.
CheckoskyS FWhitlockD, 1973, “Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task”Journal of Experimental Psychology100341–348
14.
ClementD EWeimanC F R, 1970, “Instructions, strategies, and pattern uncertainty in a visual discrimination task”Perception and Psychophysics7333–336
CugellE CRobsonJ G, 1966, “The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat”Journal of Physiology187517–552
17.
DeCostaF AChouikaM F, 1992, “Neural network recognition of texture images using third order cumulants as functional links”IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing377–80
18.
DeValoisRDeValoisR LDeValoisK K, 1997, “Neural coding of color”, in Readings on Color. Volume 2: The Science of Color Eds ByrneAHilbertD R (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 93–140
19.
FourierJ B-J, 1822Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur [The analytical theory of heat]
20.
GaborD, 1946, “Theory of communication”Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, Part III93(26) 429–459
21.
GarnerW R, 1962Uncertainty and Structure as Psychological Concepts (John Wiley, New York)
22.
GarnerW R, 1974The Processing of Information and Structure (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ)
23.
GhoshJGopalNBovikA C, 1990, “Textured image segmentation using localized receptive fields”, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks — 1990, Volume 2 (IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ) pp 283–286
24.
GombrichE H, 1998The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art2nd edition (Phaidon, London)
25.
HaralickR M, 1979, “Statistical and structural approaches to texture”IEEE Proceedings67768–804
26.
HaralickR MShanmugamKDinsteinI, 1973, “Textural features for image classification”IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-36610–621
27.
HildebrandG, 1999Origins of Architectural Pleasure (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
28.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1959, “Receptive fields of signal neurons in the cat's striate cortex”Journal of Physiology148574–591
29.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1962, “Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex”Journal of Physiology160106–154
30.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1968, “Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex”Journal of Physiology195215–243
JuleszB, 1962, “Visual pattern discrimination”IRE Transactions on Information Theory884–92
33.
JuleszB, 1975, “Experiments in the visual perception of texture”Scientific American2322–11
34.
JuleszB, 1981, “A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons”Biological Cybernetics41131–138
35.
JuleszB, 1984, “A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision”Trends in Neuroscience7(2) 41–45
36.
KoffkaK, 1922, “Perception: An introduction to the Gestalt-Theorie”Psychology Bulletin19531–585
37.
KöhlerW, 1947Gestalt Psychology4th edition (Liveright, New York)
38.
KufflerS W, 1953, “Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina”Journal of Neuropsychology1637–68
39.
MaffeiLFiorentiniA, 1973, “The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyzer”Vision Research131255–1267
40.
MalikJPeronaP, 1990, “Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms”Journal of the Optical Society of America A7923–932
41.
MichaelD N, 1953, “A cross-cultural investigation of closure”Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology48225–230
42.
MitchellT ASarhadiM, 1992, “A machine vision system using fast texture analysis for automated visual inspection”IEEE International Conference on Systems Engineering9399–402
43.
MowattM H, 1940, “Configurational properties considered ‘good’ by naïve subjects”American Journal of Psychology5346–49
44.
PomerantzJ R, 1977, “Pattern and speed of encoding”Memory and Cognition5235–241
45.
PomerantzJ R, 1991, “The structure of visual configurations: Stimulus versus subject contributions”, in The Perception of Structure Eds LockheadG RPomerantzJ R (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) pp 195–210
46.
PomerantzJ RGarnerW R, 1973a, “The role of configuration and target discriminability in a visual search task”Memory and Cognition164–68
47.
PomerantzJ RGarnerW R, 1973b, “Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks”Perception and Psychophysics14565–569
48.
PomerantzJ RKubovyM, 1986, “Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization”, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance Eds BoffK RKaufmanLThomasJ P (John Wiley, New York) pp 36–46
49.
RaoA RLohseG L, 1993, “Identifying high level features of texture perception”CVGIP: Graphics Models and Image Processing55218–233
50.
RaoA RLohseG L, 1996, “Towards a texture naming system: Identifying relevant dimensions of texture”Vision Research361649–1669
51.
SchiraG, 2001, “Architecture as prägnanz: An analysis of aesthetic ratings for images using Gabor filters”, Master's thesis, School of Architecture, University of Texas, Austin, TX
52.
SchiraG, 2002, “Mean frequency magnitudes and visual preferences for texture”, submitted to Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
53.
TamuraHMoriSYamawakiT, 1978, “Textural features corresponding to visual perception”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-86460–473
54.
TanT N, 1992, “Texture feature extraction via visual cortical channel modeling”IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition3607–610
55.
TanT NConstantinidesA G, 1990, “Texture analysis based on a human visual model”IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing42137–2140
