Fringe Belts and the Recycling of Urban Land: An Academic Concept and Planning Practice

Abstract

It has been well established by urban morphologists that fringe-belt development is an integral part of the historico-geographical development of cities, but such development has attracted little attention from planners. Despite the physical distinctiveness of Birmingham's Edwardian fringe belt, decisionmaking about its development is largely site-by-site. Its survival as a concentric zone with a high incidence of green space partly reflects the fact that the character and occupation of the individual sites of which it is composed have become deeply rooted in the mental maps of those able to influence change. Awareness of the fringe belt as an entity is rare: few landowners, developers, or planners see individual sites as integrated parts of the historical and ecological development of the city as a whole. Initially, pressure to redevelop fringe-belt plots has come largely from landowners. The proposed changes are often at variance with the predilections of local planners. Planners have a sectional perception, strongly related to the land use of cities. For developers, an interest in sites other than the one to which their planning application relates is almost entirely limited to the effects that adjacent sites might have on the viability of their proposal. The integrative quality of the fringe-belt concept is an important aspect of its potential as a citywide planning construct.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barke

, 1976, “Land use succession: A factor in fringe-belt modification” Area 8 303–306

Barke

, 1990, “Morphogenesis, fringe belts and urban size: An exploratory essay”, in The Built Form of Western Cities Ed. Slater

T R

(Leicester University Press, Leicester) pp 279–299

Birmingham City Council, 2002 Birmingham Unitary Development Plan Alterations Deposit Draft 2001: Summary of Duly Made Representations and the City Council's Response—Chapter 3 Environment Birmingham City Council, The Council House, Victoria Square, Birmingham B1 1BB

Burgess

E W

, 1925, “The growth of the city”, in The City Eds Park

R E

Burgess

E W

McKenzie

R D

(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 47–62

Conzen

M P

, 2002, “Anatomy of an American grid town: Paris without Haussmann” Enseignement Architecture Ville 7 72–84

Conzen

M R G

, 1960 Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan Analysis Institute of British Geographers Publication 27 (George Philip, London)

DoE, 1992 The Relationship between House Prices and Land Supply Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)

Kropf

(Ed.), 2001a Stratford-upon-Avon District Design Guide Stratford-upon-Avon District Council, Elizabeth House, Church Street, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwicks CV37 6HX

Kropf

, 2001b, “Testing the fringe belt concept in the planning process”, unpublished paper presented to the Eighth International Seminar on Urban Form, Cincinnati, OH, September; copy available from Roger Evans Associates, 59 – 63 High Street, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 2DN

10.

Louis

, 1936, “Die geographische Gliederung von Gross-Berlin” [The geographical structure of Greater Berlin], in Länderkundliche Forschung: Krebs-Festschrift Eds Louis

Panzer

(Engelhorn, Stuttgart) pp 146–171

11.

Cervantes

Rodrigo NE

, 1999, “The concept of the fringe belt in a Mexican city: Morelia”, in Transformations of Urban Form Eds Corona

Maffei

G L

(Alinea, Firenze) pp FK2.16–-FK2.20

12.

Vallis

E A

, 1972, “Urban land and building prices 1892–1969: III” Estates Gazette 222 1406–1407

13.

Valuation Office, 2000 Property Market Report Autumn 2000 (Estates Gazette, London)

14.

Vilagrasa

, 1990, “The fringe-belt concept in a Spanish context: The case of Lleida”, in The Built Form of Western Cities Ed. Slater

T R

(Leicester University Press, Leicester) pp 300–318

15.

von der Dollen

, 1990, “An historico-geographical perspective on fringe-belt phenomena”, in The Built Form of Western Cities Ed. Slater

T R

(Leicester University Press, Leicester) pp 319–345

16.

Whitehand

J W R

, 1967, “Fringe belts: A neglected aspect of urban geography” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 223–233

17.

Whitehand

J W R

, 1972, “Urban-rent theory, time series and morphogenesis: An example of eclecticism in geographical research” Area 4 215–222

18.

Whitehand

J W R

, 2001, “British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition” Urban Morphology 5 103–109

19.

Whitehand

J W R

Carr

C M H

, 1999, “The changing fabrics of ordinary residential areas” Urban Studies 36 1661–1677