Some of the discussions in two distinct areas of planning theory concern, namely the substantive versus procedural theory debate and the uncertain role concepts of planners, are related to each other. These concerns are considered from a practical viewpoint and some empirical data are used to raise important issues for planning practice. The viability of planning theory in Third World countries as either substantive issues alone or procedural issues alone is questioned. For educational purposes in the Third World, a wider spectrum of theories of planning can be useful for the advancement of planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattyM, 1983, “Editorial. A plan for planning education”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10245–248
2.
BaumH S, 1979, “Policy analysis: an intellectual attitude and a cognitive style” paper presented at a conference on The Role of Policy Analysis in the Education of Planners, MIT, Cambridge, 11–12 October 1979; copy obtainable from the author at School of Social Work and Community Planning, University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
3.
BaumH S, 1980a, “Analysts and planners must think organizationally”Policy Analysis6479–494
4.
BaumH S, 1980b, “Sensitizing planners to organization” in Urban and Regional Planning in an Age of Austerity Eds ClavelPForesterJGoldsmithW W (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 279–307
5.
BaumH S, 1980c, “The uncertain consciousness of planners and the professional enterprise”Plan Canada2039–53
6.
BaumH S, 1982, “Policy analysis. Special cognitive style needed”Administration and Society14213–236
7.
BehnR D, 1981, “Policy analysis and policy politics”Policy Analysis7199–226
BolanR S, 1969, “Community decision behaviour: The culture of planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35301–310
10.
BolanR S, 1980, “The practitioner as theorist. The phenomenology of the professional episode”Journal of the American Planning Association46261–274
11.
ChadwickG, 1978A Systems View of Planning: Towards a Theory of the Urban and Regional Planning Process2nd edition (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
12.
de BettencourtJ SMandellM BPolzinS ESauterV LSchoferJ L, 1982, “Making planning more responsive to its users: The concept of metaplanning”Environment and Planning A14311–322
13.
DendrinosD S, 1978, “Some comments on the Scott and Roweis — Harris discussion”Environment and Planning A10955–956
14.
FaludiA, 1973Planning Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
15.
FaludiA, 1983, “Critical rationalism and planning methodology”Urban Studies20265–278
16.
ForesterJ, 1980a, “Critical theory and planning practice”Journal of the American Planning Association46275–286
17.
ForesterJ, 1980b, “How much does the environmental review planner do?”Environmental Impact Assessment Review1104–107
18.
ForesterJ, 1982, “Planning in the face of power”Journal of the American Planning Association4867–80
19.
ForesterJ, 1983, “The geography of planning practice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1163–180
20.
ForesterJ, 1984, “Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through”Public Administration Review4423–31
21.
ForesterJRoweisS, 1983, “On planning practice: Materialism and politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1481–491
22.
FosterJ L, 1981, “Professional models for policy analysis”Administration and Society12379–397
23.
FriendJ K, 1983, “Reflections on rationality in strategic choice”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1063–69
24.
GallowayTh DEdwardsJ T, 1982, “Critically examining the assumptions of espoused theory. The case of city planning and management”Journal of the American Planning Association48184–195
25.
GoldsteinH A, 1984, “Planning as argumentation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design11297–312
26.
HabermasJ, 1981Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)
27.
HarrisB, 1978, “A note on planning theory”Environment and Planning A10221–224
28.
HealeyP, 1983, “‘Rational method’ as a mode of policy formation and implementation in land-use policy”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1019–39
29.
HemmensG CStiftelB, 1980, “Sources for the renewal of planning theory”Journal of the American Planning Association46341–345
30.
HightowerH, 1969, “Planning theory in contemporary professional education”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35326–329
31.
HonadleG HRosengardJ K, 1983, “Putting ‘projectized’ development in perspective”Public Administration and Development3299–305
32.
Jensen-ButlerC, 1983, “A materialist basis for planning theory and practice: Comments on the papers by Roweis and by Forester”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1469–479
33.
KaplanSKaplanR (Eds), 1978Humanscape: Environments for People (Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA)
34.
KreukelsA M J, 1980Planning en Planning Proces (VUGA Boekerij, 'sGravenhage)
35.
LenzR TLylesM A, 1981, “Tackling the human problems in planning”Long Range Planning1472–77
36.
LowN, 1982, “Beyond general systems theory: A constructivist perspective”Urban Studies19221–233
37.
LylesM ALenzR T, 1982, “Managing the planning process: A field study of the human side of planning”Strategic Management Journal3105–118
38.
MorganE Ph, 1983, “The project orthodoxy in development: Re-evaluating the cutting edge”Public Administration and Development3329–339
39.
ReichmanWLevyM, 1975, “Psychological restraints on effective planning”Management Review6437–42
40.
RondinelliD A, 1983, “Projects as instruments of development administration: A qualified defence and suggestions for improvement”Public Administration and Development3307–327
41.
RoweisS T, 1983, “Urban planning as professional mediation of territorial politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1139–162
42.
ScottA JRoweisS T, 1977, “Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal”Environment and Planning A91097–1119
43.
TaylorN, 1984, “A critique of materialist critiques of procedural planning theory”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design11103–126
44.
TaylorR, 1976, “Psychological aspects of planning”Long Range Planning966–74
45.
TipsW E J, 1983, “Planning theory”Division of Human Settlements Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok
46.
WebberM M, 1983, “The myth of rationality: Development planning reconsidered”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1089–99
