The ‘neotraditional’ town is receiving increasing popular, professional, and scholarly attention. Its proponents argue that its design features provide a viable alternative to the modern city and its sprawling suburbs. That critical and normative argument is assessed in this paper by means of Lynch's A Theory of Good City Form and the five performance dimensions given therein. The theory aids in synthesizing otherwise disparate elements of the neotraditional discourse, while subjecting it to a comprehensive and normative critique. The paper is concluded with an assessment of the neotraditional town design in deference to the performance dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderCSilversteinMAngelSIshikawaSAbramsD, 1975The Oregon Experiment (Oxford University Press, New York)
2.
BanisterD, 1992, “Energy use, transport, and settlement patterns”, in European Research in Regional Science 2. Sustainable Development and Urban Form Ed. BrehenyM J, (Pion, London) pp 160–181
3.
BarnettJ, 1986The Elusive City: Five Centuries of Design, Ambition and Miscalculation (Harper and Row, New York)
4.
BrehenyM J, 1990, “Strategic planning and urban sustainability”, Department of Geography, University of Reading, Berks
5.
BrehenyM J, (Ed.), 1992European Research in Regional Science 2. Sustainable Development and Urban Form (Pion, London)
6.
BurbyRWeissF, 1976New Communities USA (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
7.
CalthorpeP, 1993The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream (Princeton Architectural Press, New York)
8.
DuanyAPlater-ZyberkE, 1992, “The second coming of the American small town”Plan Canada May, pp 6–13
9.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
10.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
11.
JencksC, 1984The Language of Post-modern Architecture (Academy Editions, London)
12.
KatzP, 1994The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community (McGraw-Hill, New York)
13.
KriegerA, (Ed.), 1991Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and Town-making Principles (Rizzoli, New York)
14.
LennertzW, 1991, “Town-making fundamentals”, in Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and Town-making Principles Ed. KriegerA, (Rizzoli, New York) pp 21–24
15.
LynchK, 1960The Image of the City (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
16.
LynchK, 1984A Theory of Good City Form2nd edition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
MasseyD, 1991, “The political place of locality studies”Environment and Planning A23267–281
18.
PerryC, 1929, “The neighborhood unit”, in The Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs (Regional Plan Association, New York) pp 34–44
19.
ScullyV, 1991, “Seaside and New Haven”, in Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and Town-making Principles Ed. KriegerA, (Rizzoli, New York) pp 17–20
20.
ScullyV, 1994, “The architecture of community”, in The New Urbanism Ed. KatzP, (McGraw-Hill, New York) pp 221–230
21.
SeidmanSWagnerD G, 1992Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate Over General Theory (Blackwell, Oxford)
22.
SojaE W, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
23.
SteinC, 1957Toward New Towns for America (Reinhold, New York)
24.
UnwinR, 1909Town Planning in Practice (T F Unwin, London)
25.
VenturiRScott-BrownDIzenourS, 1972Learning from Las Vegas (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
26.
ZukinS, 1991Landscapes of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
