Developing the best professional talent is critical to the success of planning. Graduate school admissions procedures often rely heavily on prior grade point averages and standardized test scores to determine who is allowed to study toward planning degrees. The efficacy of these credentials in predicting graduate school performance is examined. Findings suggest that over-reliance on quantitative credentials may not be effectively identifying those who are most likely to graduate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackburnJ A, 1990, “Assessment and evaluation in admission”, New York: College Entrance Examination Board, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
2.
BridgmanBWendlerC, 1991, “Gender differences in prediction of college math performance and in college math course grades”Journal of Educational Psychology83275–284.
3.
CaseD ORichardsonJ V, 1990, “Predictors of student performance with emphasis on gender and ethnic determinants”Journal of Education for Library and Information Science30163–182.
4.
CatlinR, 1993, “The planning profession and blacks in the United States: A content analysis of academic and professional literature”Journal of Planning Education and Research13(1) 26–32.
5.
CovertRChanskyN, 1975, “The moderator effect of undergraduate grade point average on the prediction of success in graduate education”Educational and Psychological Measurement35947–950.
6.
ElliotRStrentaA C, 1988, “Effects of improving the reliability of the GPA on prediction generally and on comparative predictions for gender and race particularly”Journal of Educational Measurement25333–347.
7.
EthingtonC AWolfeL M, 1986, “Sex differences in quantitative and analytical GRE performance”Research in Higher Education2555–67.
8.
ETS, 1981GRE 1981–82 Information BulletinEducational Testing Service, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
9.
FeldmanM, 1994, “Perloff revisited: Reassessing planning education in postmodern times”Journal of Planning Education and Practice1389–103.
10.
FergusonE, 1993, “Admissions policies and diversity”, paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Philadelphia, October; copy available from Graduate City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
11.
FordhamSOgbuJ, 1986, “Black students' school success: Coping with the burden of ‘acting white’”The Urban Review18(3) 176–206.
12.
GrahamL, 1991, “Predicting academic success of students in a master of business administration program”Educational and Psychological Measurement51721–727.
13.
GrandyJ, 1994, “Trends and profiles: Statistics about Graduate Record Examinees by sex and ethnicity”, Educational Testing Service, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
14.
HochC, 1993, “Racism and planning”Journal of the American Planning Association59451–460.
15.
HollandD CEisenhartM, 1990Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
16.
JohnsonS T, 1987, “Test fairness and bias: Measuring academic achievement among black youth”The Urban League Review11(1) 76–92.
17.
KirchnerG L, 1993, “Gender as a moderator variable in predicting success in a master of arts in teaching program”Educational and Psychological Measurement53155–157.
18.
LannholmG V, 1968, “Review of studies employing GRE scores in predicting success in graduate study 1952–1967”, special report 68-1, Graduate Record Examinations, PO Box 6000, Educational Training Service, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
19.
LichtBDweckC, 1983, “Sex differences in achievement orientations: Consequences for academic choices and attainments”, in Sex Differentiation and Schooling Ed. MarlandM, (Heinemann Educational Books, London) pp 72–97.
20.
MaberlyN C, 1960, “The validity of the Graduate Record Examinations as used with English speaking foreign students”Educational and Psychological Measurement23785–788.
21.
MilnerMMcNeilJ SKingS W, 1984, “The GRE: A question of validity in predicting performance in professional schools of social work”Educational and Psychological Measurement44945–950.
22.
MorrisM, 1992, “Planners' salaries and employment trends: 1991”, Planners' Advisory Service report 439, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL.
23.
National Commission on Testing and Public Policy, 1990, “From gatekeeper to gateway: Transforming testing in America”, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
24.
NiebanckP, 1988, “Planning education: Unleashing the future”Journal of American Planning Association54432–442.
25.
OgbuJ, 1987, “Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation”Anthropology and Education Quarterly18312–334.
26.
PeattieL, 1968, “Reflection on advocacy planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners3480–87.
27.
PerloffH S, 1974, “The evolution of planning education”, in Planning in America Ed. GodschalkD R, (American Institute of Planners Press, Washington, DC) pp 161–180.
28.
PivenF F, 1970, “Whom does the advocate planner serve”Social Policy132–37.
29.
PrakashVAmadorV A B, (Eds), 1992Guide to Graduate Education in Urban and Regional Planning8th edition, Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Department of Urban Studies and Planning 7–344 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
30.
RosserP, 1989The SAT Gender Gap (Center for Women's Policy Studies, Washington, DC).
31.
ScottRShawM, 1985, “Black and white performance in graduate school and policy implications of the use of Graduate Record Examination scores in admissions”Journal of Negro Education5414–23.
32.
SimonRDannerM, 1990, “Gender, race, and predictive value of the LSAT”Journal of Legal Education40525–529.
33.
ThomasJ, 1994, “Planning history and the black urban experience: Linkages and contemporary implications”Journal of Planning Education and Research141–11.
34.
ThornellJ GMcCoyA, 1985, “The predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examination for subgroups of students in different academic disciplines”Educational and Psychological Measurement45415–419.
35.
TompkinsL DMehringT, 1989, “Competency testing and the international student: A common sense approach to detecting cultural bias in testing instruments”Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development1772–78.
36.
VancouverJ BReinhartM ASolomonD JHaffJ J, 1989, “Determination of validity and bias in the use of grade point average and the MCAT in the selection of medical school students”, unpublished paper available through the Educational Resources Information Clearinghouse, 7402 Fullerton Road #110, Springfield, VA22153-2852.
37.
WahDRobinsonD, 1990, “Examinee and score trends for the GRE general test: 1977–78, 1982–83, 1986–87, and 1987–88”, Educational Testing Service, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
38.
WainerHSteinbergL, 1992, “Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional study”Harvard Educational Review62323–336.
39.
WallaceA D, 1952, “The predictive value of the Graduate Record Examination at Howard University”, unpublished master's thesis, Howard University, Washington, DC.
40.
Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, 1992, “The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education”, American Association of University Women Education Foundation, PO Box 251, Annapolis Station, MD 20701.
41.
WilsonK M, 1982, “A study of the validity of the restructured GRE aptitude test for predicting first-year performance in graduate study”, GRE Board Report 78-R, Educational Testing Service, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
42.
WilsonK M, 1986, “The relationship of scores based on the GRE general test item types to undergraduate grades: An exploratory study for selected subgroups”, GRE Professional Report 83-19P, Educational Testing Services, PO Box 6000, Princeton, NJ 08541-6000.
43.
WimberleyD WMcCloudD GFlinnW L, 1992, “Predicting success of Indonesian graduate students in the United States”Comparative Review36487–508.
