Governance and Transaction Costs in Planning Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Institutional Analysis of Land-Use Planning and Development Control—The Case of Israel
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2001
Governance and Transaction Costs in Planning Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Institutional Analysis of Land-Use Planning and Development Control—The Case of Israel
Transaction cost theory (TCT), explaining economic institutions, applies to the public sector too. TCT accounts for public land-use planning and development control, and suggests some alternative forms that governance of land development and the property market could take. The basic elements of a conceptual model enabling the institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control systems are: (1) an integrated TCT; (2) a transactions-based representation of the land and real-estate development process; and (3) a repertoire of alternative forms of governance, ranging from statutory planning and regulation to contractual covenants. These elements are developed for application in an institutional analysis of the Israeli statutory planning system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderE R, 1981, “Slum rehabilitation in Israel: the administrative – institutional context”, WP 8, Neighborhood Renewal in Israel: History and Context, Neaman Institute/Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
2.
AlexanderE R, 1995How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam)
3.
AlexanderE R, 2000, “Interorganizational coordination and strategic planning: the architecture of institutional design”, in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning Eds SaletW, A Faludi Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, The Trippenhuis, Kloveniersburgwal29, Amsterdam, pp 159–174
4.
AlexanderE R, 2001, “A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: towards the institutional analysis of public planning”Town Planning Review721–31
5.
AlexanderE RAltermanRLaw-YoneH, 1983Evaluating Plan Implementation: The National Statutory Planning System in Israel, Progress in Planning 20, Part 2 (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
6.
AltermanR, 1988, “The local statutory plan according to the planning and construction law—what is it? Flexibility, current planning and the effectuation process”Ir Ve'Ezor185–26 (in Hebrew)
7.
AltermanRMosseriA, 1993, “An historic look at national planning in Israel: its institutions, legal basis and goals”, in Israel 2020: Master Plan for Israel in the 21st Century, Stage IVolume 1Research and Planning Team, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology/Israel Institute of Architects and Town Planners (in Hebrew, with English abstract)
8.
ClappJ A, 1971New Towns and Urban Policy: Planning Metropolitan Growth (Dunellen, New York)
9.
DixitA K, 1996The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
10.
GatD, 1998, “Space, time and value: a framework for teaching real estate”, paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Real Estate Society, Monterrey, CA
11.
Israel 20201997Master Plan for Israel in the 21st Century: Summary ReportResearch and Planning Team, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel Institute of Architects and Town Planners (in Hebrew)
12.
Israel Finance Ministry, 1998, “Interim report, September”, Committee for Central City Rehabilitation (Eiges Committee), Budget Division, 1 Kaplan Street, Jerusalem 91008 (in Hebrew)
13.
Lai Wai ChungL, 1998, “The leasehold system as a means of planning by contract: the case of Hong Kong”Town Planning Review69249–275
14.
MeijerFVisscherH, 1998, “The deregulation of building controls: a comparison of Dutch and other European systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25617–629
15.
NeedhamD BKruijtBKoendersP, 1993Urban Land and Property Markets in the Netherlands (UCL Press, London)
16.
PrestridgeJ A, 1973Case Studies of Six Planned New Towns in the US (University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Lexington, KY)
17.
SoferM, 1992The Time Dimension in Statutory Planning in Israel PhD Thesis, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa (in Hebrew, English summary)
18.
Statistical Abstract of Israel1999, Central Bureau of Statistics, 66 Kanfei Nesharim Street, Jerusalem 91342
19.
TorgovnikE, 1990The Politics of Urban Planning Policy (The University Press of America, Lanham, PA)
20.
ULI, 1974Irvine: The Genesis of a New Community (The Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC)
