Over the course of many years, professional planners have used a plethora of methods and tools to support their planning activities. Nevertheless, it can be argued that planning practioners have never fully embraced the much wider diversity of available methods, techniques, and models developed in the research laboratories. On the basis of this observation, this study poses several questions about why there is an apparent mismatch in planning practice between supply, demand, and applications of planning-support instruments (including ‘planning support systems’) and their outcomes (dedicated information and knowledge), and how this mismatch can be solved. In order to arrive at an answer, a conceptual framework is constructed, which constitutes crucial factors that influence the potential planning support roles of information, knowledge, and instruments. With the help of this framework, a developmental overview is interpreted of the theoretical planning traditions that exerted an influence on planning practice during the last half millennium in the Western world. From this interpretation, some lessons can be learned about the improvement of the planning-support role in factual planning practice, and moreover, it opens up some new questions and discussion points.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderE R, 1984, “After rationality, what? A review of responses to paradigm breakdown”Journal of the American Planning Association50 (4) 62–69
2.
AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Eds), 2002Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory (Routledge, London)
3.
BattyM, 2004, “Dissecting the streams of planning history: Technology versus policy through models”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31326–330
BishopI D, 1998, “Planning support: Hardware, software in search of a system”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems22189–202
6.
BrailRKlostermanR (Eds), 2001Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools (ESRI Press, Redlands, CA)
7.
BrysonJ MEinsweilerR C (Eds), 1988Strategic Planning: Threats and Opportunities for Planners (Planners Press, Chicago, IL)
8.
BrysonJ MRoeringW D, 1988, “Applying private sector strategic planning in the public sector”, in Strategic Planning: Threats and Opportunities for Planners Eds BrysonJ MEinsweilerR C (Planners Press, Chicago, IL) pp 15–34
9.
CampbellSFainsteinS, 2003Readings in Planning Theory2nd edition (Blackwell, Oxford)
10.
ChorleyR, 1988, “Some reflections on the handling of geographical information”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems23–9
11.
CouclelisH, 1989, “Geographically informed planning: requirements for planning relevant GIS”, paper presented at the 36th North American Meeting of Regional Science Association, Santa Barbara, available from H Couclelis, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, available from H Couclelis, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara
12.
DaltonL C, 1986, “Why the rational paradigm persists: The resistance of the professional education, and practice to alternative forms of planning”Journal of Planning Education and Research6147–153
13.
DavidoffP, 1965, “Advocacy and pluralism in planning”, in A Reader in Planning Theory Ed. FaludiA (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 277–296
14.
EngelenGGeertmanSSmitsPWesselsC, 1999, “Dynamic GIS, strategic physical planning support: A practical application”, in Geographical Information and Planning Eds StillwellJGeertmanSOpenshawS (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 87–111
15.
EtzioniA, 1968The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes (Free Press, New York)
16.
FaludiA, 1973Planning Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
17.
FaludiA, 1987A Decision-centred View of Environmental Planning (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
18.
FarrahP, 2001Rationalism, Empiricism, and Pragmatism: The Three Major Epistemological Traditions, Their Influence on Instructional DesignInternational Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Hengelosestraat 99, 7500 AA Enschede
19.
FlyvbjergBRichardsonT, 2002, “Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 44–62
20.
ForesterJ, 1989, “Planning in the face of power” (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
21.
ForesterJ, 1999, “The deliberative practitioner” (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
22.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
23.
GeertmanS, 1999, “Geographical information technology and physical planning”, in Geographical Information and Planning Eds StillwellJGeertmanSOpenshawS (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 69–86
24.
GeertmanS, 2002, “Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2921–35
25.
GeertmanSStillwellJ, 2000, “Geoinformation, geotechnology and geoplanning in the 1990s”, WP 00/01, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds
26.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (Eds), 2003Planning Support Systems in Practice (Springer, Heidelberg)
27.
HabermasJ, 1983The Theory of Communicative ActionVolume 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
28.
HallP, 1975Urban and Regional Planning (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
29.
HarrisB, 1960, “Plan or projection: An examination of the use of models in planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners26265–272
30.
HarrisB, 1999, “Computing in planning: Professional and institutional requirements”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26321–331
31.
HarrisN, 2002, “Collaborative planning: From theoretical foundations to practice forms”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 21–43
32.
HarrisNBattyM, 1993, “Locational models, geographic information and planning support systems”Journal of Planning Education and Research12184–198
33.
HarrisonP, 2002, “A pragmatic attitude to planning”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 157–171
34.
HealeyP, 1998, “Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning”Environment and Planning A301531–1546
35.
HopkinsL D, 1998, “Progress, prospects for planning support systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design anniversary issue 29–31
36.
KlostermanR E, 1994, “International support for computers in planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2387–391
37.
KostermanR E, 1998, “Computer applications in planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design anniversary issue 32–36
38.
KlostermanR E, 2001, “Planning support systems: A new perspective on computer-aided planning”, in Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools Eds BrailRKlostermanR (ESRI Press, Redlands, CA) pp 1–23
39.
KreukelsA, 1980Planning en Planningproces: een verkenning van de Sociaalwetenschappelijke Theorievorming op Basis van Ruimtelijke Planning [Planning and planning process: a reconnaissance of human scientific theory based on spatial planning] ('s-Gravenhage, Gezondeidsraad)
40.
LeeD R, 1973, “Requiem for large-scale models”Journal of the American Institute of Planners39163–178
41.
LindblomC E, 1959, “The science of 'muddling through”, in A Reader in Planning Theory Ed. FaludiA (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 151–169
42.
LindblomC ECohenD K, 1979Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
43.
MasserI, 2003, “Future research for urban and regional planning and geoinformation management”, ITC farewell lecture 27 March, copy available from I Masser, Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne, Victoria
44.
MastopJ M, 1984Besluitvorming, Handelen en Normeren: Een Methodologische Studie Naar Aanleiding van het Streekplanwerk [Decisionmaking, acting, and regulating: a methodological research concerning regional planning] (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam)
45.
MeyersonMBanfieldE, 1955Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest (Free Press, New York)
46.
Nedovic-BudicZ, 1998, “The impact of GIS technology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25681–692
47.
OranjeM, 2002, “Planning and the postmodern turn”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 172–186
48.
OttensH, 1990, “The application of geographical information systems in urban and regional planning”, in Geographical Information Systems for Urban and Regional Planning Eds ScholtenH JStillwellJ (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 15–22
49.
PenningtonM, 2002, “A Hayekian liberal critique of collaborative planning”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 187–205
50.
RittelHWebberM, 1984, “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, in Developments in Design Methodology Ed. CrossN (John Wiley, New York) pp 135–144
51.
Rubenstein-MontanoB, 2000, “A survey of knowledge-based information systems for urban planning: Moving towards knowledge management”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems24155–172
52.
ScholtenHStillwellJ (Eds), 1990Geographical Information Systems for Urban and Regional Planning (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
53.
SchuurJ, 1994, “Analysis and design in computer-aided physical planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2197–108
54.
ScottARoweisS, 1977, “Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal”Environment and Planning A91095–1208
55.
SimmondsD, 2001, “The objectives and design of a new land-use modelling package: DELTA”, in Regional Science in Business Eds ClarkeGMaddenM (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 115–157
56.
SimonH, 1947Administrative Behaviour (Free Press, Glencoe, IL)
57.
StillwellJGeertmanSOpenshawS, 1999, “Developments in geographical information and planning”, in Geographical Information and Planning Eds StillwellJGeertmanSOpenshawS (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 3–22
58.
van de GraafHHoppeR, 1989Beleid en Politiek: Een Inleiding tot de Beleidswetenschap en de Beleidskunde [Policy and politics: an introduction into policy science] (Coutinho, Muiderberg)
59.
VonkGGeertmanSSchotP, 2005, “Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems”Environment and Planning A37909–924
60.
WebsterC J, 1993, “GIS and the scientific inputs to planning, part 1: Description”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20709–728
61.
WebsterC J, 1994, “GIS and the scientific inputs to planning, part 2: Prediction and prescription”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21145–157
62.
WorrallL, 1994, “The role of GIS-based spatial analysis in strategic management in local government”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems185323–332
