The basic rules of central place networks are abstracted and formulated as three geometric series scaling laws, which can be transformed into several power laws associated with fractal structure. The scaling laws might be the Rosetta Stone to understand the complexity of human geographical systems because they take the form of Horton and Strahler's laws in geomorphology and Gutenberg and Richter's laws in seismology indicative of fractals and self-organized criticality (SOC). An empirical analysis is conducted with the use of data from southern Germany, given by Christaller. The fractal dimensions, Df, of four systems are calculated as follows: Df is 1.733 for Munich, 1.685 for Nuremberg, 1.837 for Stuttgart, and 1.481 for Frankfurt. SOC theory is employed to interpret the fractality of central places, and the power laws are seen as signatures of feasible optimality, thus yielding further support to the suggestion that optimality of the system as a whole explains the dynamic origin of fractal forms in nature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenP M, 1997Cities and Regions as Self-organizing Systems: Models of Complexity (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam)
2.
AllenP MSanglierM, 1979, “A dynamic model of growth in a central place system”Geographical Analysis11156–272
3.
AllenP MSanglierM, 1981, “Urban evolution: Self-organization, and decisionmaking”Environment and Planning A13167–183
4.
AnderssonCRasmussenSWhiteR, 2002, “Urban settlement transitions”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29841–865
5.
ArlinghausS L, 1985, “Fractals take a central place”Geografiska Annaler B6783–88
6.
ArlinghausS L, 1990, “Beyond the fractal”Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics1(1), http://www.imagenet.org/
7.
ArlinghausS LArlinghausW C, 1989, “The fractal theory of central place geometry: A Diophantine analysis of fractal generators for arbitrary Loschian numbers”Geographical Analysis21103–121
8.
ArlinghausS LArlinghausW C, 2004, “Geometric visualization of hexagonal hierarchies: Animation and virtual reality”Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics15(1), http://www.imagenet.org/
9.
BakP, 1996How Nature Works: The Science of Self-organized Criticality (Springer, New York)
10.
BanavarJ RColaioriFFlamminiAMaritanARinaldoA, 2001, “Scaling, optimality, and landscape evolution”Journal of Statistical Physics104(1–2) 1–48
BarberaLRossoR, 1989, “On the fractal dimension of stream networks”Water Resources Research25735–741
13.
BattyM, 1991, “Generating urban forms from diffusive growth”Environment and Planning A23511–544
14.
BattyM, 2000, “Less is more, more is different: Complexity, morphology, cities, and emergence”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27167–168
15.
BattyMLongleyP, 1994Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function (Academic Press, London)
16.
BattyMXieY, 1999, “Self-organized criticality and urban development”Discrete Dynamics of Nature and Society3(2–3) 109–124
17.
BattyMCouclelisHEichenM, 1997, “Urban systems as cellular automata”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24159–164
18.
BeckmannM J, 1958, “City and hierarchies and distribution of city size”Economic Development and Cultural Change6243–248
19.
BenguiguiLCzamanskiDMarinovMPortugaliY, 2000, “When and where is a city fractal?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27507–519
20.
BossomaierTGreenD, 1998Patterns in the Sand: Computers, Complexity and Life (Allen and Unwin, Sydney)
21.
BuraSGuérin-PaceFMathianHPumainDSandersL, 1996, “Multiagent systems and the dynamics of a settlement system”Geographical Analysis28161–178
22.
ChenY G, 1998, “An empirical analysis of Koch snowflake model of urban system: Fractals and fractal dimension of central place system (with k = 3)”Economic Geography18(4) 33–37 (in Chinese)
23.
ChenY GLiH Q, 1994, “A Koch snowflake model of urban systems: A possible complement to Christaller's central place theory”Economic Geography14(3) 10–14 (in Chinese)
24.
ChenY GLiuJ S, 2002, “Derivations of fractal models of city hierarchies using entropy-maximization principle”Progress in Natural Science12208–211
25.
ChenY GZhouYX, 2003, “The rank-size rule and fractal hierarchies of cities: Mathematical models and empirical analyses”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30799–818
26.
ChristallerW, 1933Central Places in Southern Germany translated in 1966 by BaskinC W (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
27.
ChristallerW, 1968De Guo Nan Bu Zhong Xin Di Yuan Li translated in 1998 by ChangZWangX from Christaller Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland [Central places in southern Germany] (Commercial Press, Beijing)
28.
DaceyM F, 1965, “The geometry of central place theory”Geografiska Annaler47B111–124
29.
EvansA W, 1985Urban Economics: An Introduction (Basil Blackwell, New York)
30.
GoldenfeldNKadanoffL P, 1999, “Simple lessons from complexity”Science284(2) 87–89
31.
HackJ T, 1957, “Studies of longitudinal streams profiles in Virginia and Maryland”U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers B29445–97
32.
HortonR E, 1945, “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology”Bulletin of the Geophysical Society of America56275–370
33.
KauffmanS, 1993The Origin of Order (Oxford University Press, New York)
34.
KayeB H, 1989A Random Walk Through Fractal Dimensions (VCH, New York)
35.
KingL JGolledgeR G, 1978Cities, Space, and Behavior: The Elements of Urban Geography (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
36.
LeeY, 1989, “An allometric analysis of the US urban system: 1960–80”Environment and Planning A21463–476
37.
LöschA, 1940The Economics of Location translated in 1954 by WoglomW HStolperW R (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
38.
MandelbrotB B, 1983The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W H Freeman, New York)
39.
PortugaliJ, 2000Self-organization and the City (Springer, Berlin)
40.
PrigogineIStengersI, 1984Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature (Bantam Books, New York)
41.
RichardsA, 2002, “Complexity in physical geography”Geography87(2) 99–107
42.
Rodriguez-IturbeIRinaldoA, 2001Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-organizationpaperback edition (Cambridge University Press, New York)
43.
RyabkoB Ya, 1986, “Noise-free coding of combinatorial sources, Hausdorff dimension and Kolmogorov complexity”Problemy Peredachi Informatsii2216–26
44.
SandersLPumainDMathianHGuérin-PaceFBuraS, 1997, “SIMPOP: A multiagent system for the study of urbanism”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24287–305
45.
SchummS A, 1956, “Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey”Geological Society of America Bulletin67597–646
46.
StrahlerA E, 1952, “Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography”Geological Society of America Bulletin631117–1142
47.
TaylorJ C, 2001Hidden Unity in Nature's Laws (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
48.
TurcotteD L, 1997Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
WeylH, 1980Symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
51.
WhiteREngelenGUljeeI, 1997, “The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24323–343
52.
WoldenbergM J, 1979, “A periodic table of spatial hierarchies”, in Philosophy in Geography Eds GaleSOlssonG (D Reidel, Dordrecht) pp 429–456
53.
WoldenbergM JBerryB J L, 1967, “Rivers and central places: Analogous systems?”Journal of Regional Science7129–139
54.
ZhongY X, 1988Principle of Information Science (Fujian People's Publishing House, Fuzhou) (in Chinese)
55.
ZipfG K, 1949Human Behavior and the Principles of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
