The influence of colonial (British) rule on native (Indian) culture and vice versa has resulted in the development of ‘hybrid’ architectural styles, which are seen in the external ‘form’ of the buildings. The development of a hybrid style is an important phase in the evolution of domestic architecture in India. In this paper we explore whether such hybrid nature is also reflected in the spatial organizations of some colonial houses of eastern India. For this, a suitable methodology was evolved to analyze the spatial organizations. The compositional rules in the generation of spatial layout in these houses are analyzed through the use of space syntax analysis, with some modifications, in order to type them spatially. Typically, space syntax analysis deciphers the spatial organization by the formation of ‘inequality genotypes’, which describe only the integration (and segregation) of spaces as per the access relations. To understand more about the Indian social and cultural norms that might have influenced the spatial organizations of the houses, the accessibility, adjacency, and orientation of the spaces also need to be studied. In this paper we explain the methodology used to generate ‘genotype strings’, incorporate the aforementioned information, and help to understand and document the ingrained social and cultural factors in spatial organizations of the houses more explicitly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmorimL, 2001, “Houses of recife: from diachrony to synchrony”, paper presented at the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May, copy available from A Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/proceedings_frame.htm
2.
ArcherM, 1963, “‘Company’ architects and their influence in India”Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects70317–321
3.
ArcherM, 1980Early Views of India: The Picturesque Journey of Thomas and William Daniell 1786–1794: The Complete Aquatints (Thames and Hudson, New York)
4.
BafnaS, 2001, “Geometrical intuitions of genotypes”, paper presented at the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May, copy available from A Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/proceedings_frame.htm
5.
BafnaS, 2003, “Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques”Environment and Behavior3517–29
6.
BrownFTaharB, 2001, “Comparative analysis of M'zabite and other Berber domestic spaces”, paper presented at the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May, copy available from A Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/proceedings_frame.htm
7.
BustardW, 1995, “Genotypes of space: a spatial analysis of domestic structures in Chaco Canyon, paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis, 5 May, copy available from Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
8.
BustardW, 1999, “Space, evolution, and function in the houses of Chaco Canyon”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26219–240
9.
de FrançaF Cde HolandaF R B, 2003, “My bedroom, my world”, paper presented at the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 17–19 June, http://www.spacesyntax.net/sss4.htm
10.
DursunPSaglamerG, 2003, “Spatial analysis of different home environments in the city of Trabzon, Turkey”, paper presented at the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 17–19 June, http://www.spacesyntax.net/sss4.htm
11.
EversonN, 1989The Indian Metropolis: A View Toward the West (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
12.
FarahE AKlarqvistB, 2001, “Gender zones in the arab muslim house”, paper presented at the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May, copy available from A Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/proceedings_frame.htm
13.
FergusonT J, 1996, “Historic Zuni architecture and society: Archaeological application of space syntax”Anthropological Papers number 60, 1–176
14.
GilchristJ B, 1825The General East India Guide and Vade Mecum (Digest of the work of the Late Thomas Williamson) (Kingsbury, Parbury and Allen, London)
15.
HillierB, 1985, “The nature of the artificial”Geoforum16163–178
16.
HillierB, 1996Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
17.
HillierBHansonJ, 1982, “Discovering housing genotypes”, paper presented at the Conference on Material Culture, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge
18.
HillierBHansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
19.
HillierBHansonJPeponisJHudsonJBurdettR, 1983, “Space syntax: A new urban perspective”Architects' Journal30 November, 47–63
20.
HillierBHansonJGrahamH, 1987, “Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design14363–385
21.
HillierBPennAHansonJGrajewskiTXuJ, 1993, “Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2029–66
22.
KarimiK, 2000, “Urban conservation and spatial transformation: Preserving the fragments or maintaining the ‘spatial spirit’”Urban Design International5221–231
23.
KingA D, 1976Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
24.
KingA D, 1984The Bungalow: The Production of a Global Culture (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
25.
KiplingL, 1884, “Indian architecture today”Journal of Indian Art1(3) 1–5
26.
KirsanC, 2003, “Detective work with a deficient sample: syntactic analysis of the houses of conflict”, paper presented at the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 17–19 June, http://www.spacesyntax.net/sss4.htm
27.
KlarqvistB, 1993, “A space syntax glossary”Nordisk Arkitekturforskning [Nordic journal of architectural research]211–12
28.
LangJMadhaviDMikiD, 1997Architecture and Independence: The Search for Identity—India 1880 to 1980 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
29.
LostyJ P, 1990Calcutta: City of Palaces: A Survey of the City in the Days of the East India Company (1690–1858) (Arnold, London)
30.
MartinJ R, 1837Notes on the Medical Topography of Calcutta 19–20, quoted in Calcutta in Urban History (Firma KLM Private Ltd, Calcutta) p. 160
31.
MetcalfeT R, 1984, “Architecture and the representation of empire: India, 1860–1910”Representations637–65
32.
NeimanF D, 2003, “A very brief introduction to space syntax analysis”Issues in Historical Archaeology: Anthropology589a1–11
33.
NilssonS, 1968European Architecture in India 1750–1850 (Faber and Faber, London)
34.
OrhunDHillierBHansonJ, 1995, “Spatial types in traditional Turkish houses”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22475–498
35.
PennADesyllasJVaughanL, 1999, “The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26193–218
36.
PeponisJRossCRashidM, 1997, “The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta”Geoforum28341–358
37.
PlimptonC LHassanF A, 1987, “Social space: A determinant of house architecture”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design14439–449
38.
PrasadS, 1998, “A tale of two cities: House and town in India today”, in Paradigm of Indian Architecture—Space, Time and Representation in Design Ed. TillostonG H R (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
39.
RapoportA, 1977Human Aspects of Urban Form (Pergamon, New York)
40.
RapoportA, 1979, “Cultural origins of architecture”, in Introduction to Architecture Eds SnyderJ CCataneseA J (McGraw Hill, New York)
41.
RapoportA, 1982The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Non-verbal Approach (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
42.
ReisA, 2003, “Original and converted social housing: spatial configurations and residents' attitudes”, paper presented at the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 17–19 June, http://www.spacesyntax.net/sss4.htm
43.
SentosaL S, 2001, “Genius loci within Balinese dwellings environments: The unlikely scenarios of urban development in Bali”Habitat International25255–272
44.
SteadmanJ P, 1983Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Parts (Pion, London)
45.
TillotsonG H R, 1989The Tradition of Indian Architecture: Continuity, Controversy and Change Since 1850 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
46.
TokerUTokerZ, 2003, “Family structure and spatial configuration in Turkish house form in Anatolia from the late nineteenth century to the late twentieth century”, paper presented at the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 17–19 June, http://www.spacesyntax.net/sss4.htm
47.
UnluAOxenerO OOzdenTEdguE, 2001, “An evaluation of social interactive spaces in a university building”, paper presented at the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May, copy available from A Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, http://undertow.arch.gatech.edu/homepages/3sss/proceedings_frame.htm
