Abstract. This prospective research study was conducted at a government office which moved from an open-plan office with somewhat enclosed workspaces to another open-plan office with open workspaces. The study at the old office was conducted almost one year before the move, and the study at the new office was conducted more than one year after the move. The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to measure and evaluate changes in patterns of accessibility and visibility due to changes in office layout, (2) to understand the effects of layout changes on observed behaviors, and (3) to determine the effects of layout changes on environmental perception. The study included the analysis of visibility and accessibility of each layout using space syntax techniques, field observations of behaviors, and questionnaire surveys of employees’ perceptions of privacy, job satisfaction, and commitment to the organization. During field observations, movement, visible copresence (ie the number of people visible from a space), and face-to-face interaction were observed along a predefined route in each office. Thirty-five people responded to the questionnaire survey at the old office. Out of the thirty five, only twenty nine were available for survey at the new office. On the basis of the questionnaire survey data, three multi-item scales were constructed in order to measure perceived privacy, job satisfaction, and commitment to organization. Results indicate better visibility and accessibility, increased face-to-face interaction, and improved perceived privacy at the new office. Results also show consistent effects of space on movement, and significant positive correlations between perceived privacy, job satisfaction, and commitment to the organization at these locations, despite significant design differences. Implications of the research results and limitations of the research design are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenT J, 1970, “Communication networks in R&D laboratories”R&D Management114–21.
2.
AllenT J, 1977Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R and D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
3.
BechtelR B, 1976Enclosing Behavior (Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA).
4.
BeckerF D, 1981Workspace: Creating Environments in Organizations (Praeger, New York).
5.
BerkowitzL, 1956, “Group norms among bomber crews: patterns of perceived crew attitudes, ‘actual’ crew attitudes, and crew liking related to aircrew effectiveness in Far Eastern combat”Sociometry19141–153.
6.
BobeleH K, BuchananP J, 1979, “Building a more productive environment”Management World88–10.
7.
BovardE W, 1951, “The experimental production of interpersonal affect”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology46521–528.
8.
BrennanA, ChughJ S, KlineT, 2002, “Traditional versus open office design: a longitudinal field study”Environment and Behavior34279–299.
9.
CampbellJ P, DunnetteM D, LawlerE E, WeickK E, 1970Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness (McGraw-Hill, New York).
10.
CangelosiV E, LemonineL F, 1988, “Effects of open versus closed physical environment on employee perception and attitude”Social Behavior and Personality1671–77.
11.
ChapmanL J, CampbellD T, 1957, “An attempt to predict the performance of three-man teams from attitude measurements”Journal of Social Psychology46277–286.
12.
CrossR, BorgattiS P, 2002, “Making invisible work visible: using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration”California Management Review44(2) 25–46.
13.
CummingsT G, GriggsW H, 1976, “Worker reactions to autonomous work groups: conditions for functioning, differential effects, and individual differences”Organization and Administrative Sciences787–100.
14.
de CroonE, SluiterJ, KuijerP P, Frings-DresenM, 2005, “The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature”Ergonomics48119–134.
15.
FestingerL, SchacterS, BackK, 1950Social Pressures in Informal Groups (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
16.
GiffordR, 1997Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA).
GrajewskiT, 1992Interaction in the Work Environment PhD thesis, University College, London.
19.
GullahornJ T, 1952, “Distance and friendship as factors in the gross interaction matrix”Sociometry15123–134.
20.
GyllenhammerP G, 1977People at Work (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
21.
HallE, 1966The Hidden Dimension (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).
22.
HillierB, 1996Space is the Machine (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
23.
HillierB, GrajewskiT, 1987, “The application of space syntax to work environments inside buildings”, unpublished report, Unit for Architectural Studies, University CollegeLondon.
24.
HillierB, HansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
25.
HillierB, PennA, 1991, “Visible colleges: structure and randomness in the place of discovery”Science in Context423–49.
26.
HillierB, PennA, 1992, “The social potential of buildings: space and the innovative milieu in scientific research laboratories”Proceedings of the Corporate Space and Architecture ConferenceParis.
27.
HolahanC J, SaegertS, 1973, “Behavioral and attitudinal effects of large-scale variation in the physical environment of psychiatric wards”Journal of Abnormal Psychology82454–462.
28.
HomansG C, 1950The Human Group (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York).
29.
HomansG C, 1954, “The cash posters: a study of a group of working girls”American Sociological Review19724–733.
30.
LawrenceP R, LorschJ W, 1967Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard University Graduate School of Business, Cambridge, MA).
31.
McCoyJ M, 2002, “Work environments: the changing workplace”, in Handbook of Environmental Psychology Eds BechtelR B, ChurchmanA (John Wiley, New York) pp 443–460.
32.
MaransR W, SpreckelmeyerK F, 1982, “Evaluating open and conventional office design”Environment and Behavior14333–351.
33.
MittlemanD, 1996, “The impact of physical environment on performance and satisfaction in the white collar office: an overview of the literature”Proceedings of the IFIP 8.4 Conference on the International Office of the FutureTuscon, AZ.
34.
OldhamG R, BrassD J, 1979, “Employee reactions to an open-plan office: a naturally occurring quasi-experiment”Administrative Science Quarterly24267–284.
35.
OldhamG R, CummingsA, ZhouJ, 1995, “The spatial configuration of organizations: a review of the literature and some new research directions”Personnel and Human Resources Management131–37.
36.
ParsonsH M, 1976, “Work environments”, in Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, Volume 1 Eds AltmanI, WohlwillJ F (Plenum, New York) 163–209.
37.
PennA, DesyllasJ, VaughanL, 1997, “The space of innovation”Proceedings of the Space Syntax SymposiumUniversity CollegeLondon; available from A Penn, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London.
38.
PeponisJ, WinemanJ, RashidM, BafnaS, KimS H, 1997a, “On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside buildings: convex partitions and their local properties”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24761–781.
39.
PeponisJ, RossC, RashidM, 1997b, “The structure of urban space, movement, and copresence: the case of Atlanta”Geoforum28341–358.
40.
PeponisJ, WinemanJ, BafnaS, RashidM, KimS H, 1998a, “On the generation of linear representations of spatial configuration”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25559–576.
41.
PeponisJ, WinemanJ, RashidM, BafnaS, KimS H, 1998b, “Describing plan configuration according to the covisibility of surfaces”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25693–708.
42.
PowellR M, 1952, “Sociometric analysis of informal groups—their structure and function in two contrasting communities”Sociometry15367–399.
43.
RapoportA, 1982The Meaning of the Built Environment (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
44.
RashidM, ZimringC, 2005, “On psychosocial constructs and office settings: a review of the empirical literature”Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA) 35 Conference Vancouver; available from the author.
45.
RashidM, ZimringC, WinemanJ, FlaningamT, NubaniL, HammashR, 2005, “The effects of spatial behaviors and layout attributes on individuals' perception of psychosocial constructs in offices”Proceedings of the Fifth Space Syntax Conference Delft; available from the author.
46.
RashidM, KampschroerK, WinemanJ, ZimringC, 2006a, “Spatial layout and face-to-face interaction in offices—a study of the mechanisms of spatial effects on face-to-face interaction”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33825–844.
47.
RashidM, CraigD, ZimringC, ThitisawatM, 2006b, “Sedentary and fleeting activities and their spatial correlates in offices”Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA) Atlanta, GA; available from the author.
48.
RiceA K, 1958Productivity and Social Organization: The Ahmedabad Experiment (Tavistock, London).
49.
SpectorP E, 1985, “Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the job satisfaction survey”American Journal of Community Psychology13693–713.
50.
SpectorP E, 1997Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
51.
SundstromE, 1987, “Work environments: offices and factories”, in Handbook of Environmental Psychology Eds StokolsD, AltmanI (John Wiley, New York).
52.
SundstromE, AltmanL, 1989, “Physical environments and work-group effectiveness”Research in Organizational Behavior11175–209.
53.
SundstromE, BurtR, KampD, 1980, “Privacy at work: architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance”Academy of Management Journal23101–117.
54.
WalkerC R, GuestR H, 1952The Man on the Assembly Line (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
55.
WhyteW H, 1956The Organization Man (Simon and Schuster, New York).
56.
WinemanJ D, 1982, “Office design and evaluation: an overview”Environment and Behavior14271–298.
57.
WinemanJ D, SerratoM, 1998, “Facility design for high-performance teams”, in Supporting Work Team Effectiveness: Best Management Practices for Fostering High Performance Eds E Sundstrom and Associates (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 271–298.
58.
WinemanJ, RashidM, ZimringC, FlaningamT, 2003Final Report—GSA High Performance Workspace (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).
59.
ZalesnyM D, FaraceR V, 1987, “Traditional versus open offices: a comparison of sociotechnical, social relations, and symbolic meaning perspectives”Academy of Management Journal30240–259.
