This paper explores the potential of geographic information systems (GIS) in the study of urban historic cartography. The first part of the paper focuses on three European schools of urban morphology, that have been using cartographic analysis in the study of the city, since the first half of the 20th century. Built on this theoretical context, the second part describes the use of GIS in redrawing historic maps of Lisbon and Oporto. A discussion of the fundamental contribution of this method is then presented. GIS encourages and enables rigorous representation of the spatial characteristics of urban phenomena. Furthermore, the application of this method provides the following five main outputs: a dynamic framework to represent the evolution of the urban form, continuously open to the addition of, and articulation with, other morphological and planning data and information; the overall and simultaneous vision of the urban-form evolution of a particular city in a long time period; the rigorous identification and characterization of urban-expansion areas; the opportunity to systematically analyse unexplored urban-development processes; and, finally, the possibility to typify the urban fabric, taking advantage of a rigorous and versatile cartographic tool.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderC, 1965, “A city is not a tree”Architectural Forum12258–62
2.
AlexanderCIshikawaSSilversteinMJacobsonMFiksdahl-KingIAngelS, 1977A Pattern Language (Oxford University Press, New York)
3.
BattyM, 2001, “Exploring isovist fields: Space and shape in architectural and urban morphology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28123–150
4.
BattyMLongleyP, 1994Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function (Academic Press, London)
5.
BorieAMicheloniPPinonP, 1980Formes Urbaines et Sites de Méandres [Urban forms and meandering sites] (Ville Recherche Diffusion, Paris)
6.
CaniggiaG, 1963Lettura di una Citta: Como [The reading of a city: Como] (Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, Rome)
7.
CaniggiaGMaffeiG, 2001Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building (Aliniea Editrice, Florence)
8.
CastexJDepauleJPaneraiP, 1977Formes Urbaines: De l'îlot à Barre [Urban forms: From block to building] (Dunod, Paris)
9.
CastexJCelestePPaneraiP, 1980Lecture d'une Vile: Versailles [The reading of a city: Versailles] (Editions du Moniteur, Paris)
10.
CataldiG, 1998, “Designing in stages. Theory and design in the typological concept of the Italian school of Saverio Muratori”, in Typolotical Process and Design Theory Ed. PetruccioliA (Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge) pp 127–140
11.
CataldiG, 2003, “From Muratori to Caniggia: The origins and development of the Italian School of design typology”Urban Morphology719–34
12.
CataldiGMaffeiGVaccaroP, 2002, “Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology”Urban Morphology63–14
13.
ConzenM, 1960Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan Analysis (The Institute of British Geographers, London)
14.
CooperJ, 2003, “Fractal assessment of street-level skylines: A possible means of assessing and comparing character”Urban Morphology773–82
15.
CooperJ, 2005, “Assessing urban character: The use of fractal analysis of street edges”Urban Morphology995–107
16.
CorsiniM, 2001, “Building types and urban fabric of Rome's outer suburbs: From reading to planning”, in Proceedings of 6th International Seminar on Urban Form, Cincinnati available from Scheer@arch.utah.edu, pp 43–46
17.
CostaA, 1789Descrição Topográfica e Histórica da Cidade do Porto [Historical and topographical description of Oporto] (BPMP, Oporto)
KrierR, 1975L'Espace de la Ville: Théorie et Pratique [Town space: Theory and practice] (AAM, Brussels)
30.
KrugerM, 1977An Apporach to Built Form Connectivity at an Urban Scale PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
31.
LarkhamP, 1997, “Urban morphology and typology in the United Kingdom”, in Typological Process and Design Theory Ed. PetruccioliA (Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge) pp 159–177
32.
LarkhamP, 2006, “The study of urban form in Great Britain”Urban Morphology10117–141
33.
LavedanP, 1926Histoire de l'Urbanisme. Antiquité, Moyen-Age [The history of town planning. Ancient times, Middle Ages] (Henri Laurens, Paris)
34.
LavedanP, 1941Histoire de l'Urbanisme. La Renaissance et les Temps Modernes [The history of town planning. The Renaissance and Modern Times] (Henri Laurens, Paris)
35.
LavedanP, 1952Histoire de l'Urbanisme. L'Époque Moderne [The history of town planning. The Modern Ages]Henri Laurens, Paris)
36.
LynchK, 1960The Image of the City (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
37.
LynchK, 1981Good City Form (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
38.
MartinLMarchLEcheniqueM, 1972Urban Spaces and Structures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
39.
MarzotN, 2002, “The study of urban form in Italy”Urban Morphology659–73
40.
MeirelesM, 1982Catálogo dos Livros das Plantas [Catalogue of the books on town plans] (AHCMP, Oporto)
41.
MoudonA, 1997, “Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field”Urban Morphology13–10
42.
MoudonA, 1998, “The changing morphology of suburban neighbourhoods”, in Typological Process and Design Theory Ed. PetruccioliA (Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge) pp 141–157
43.
MuratoriS, 1959Studi per una Operante Storia Urbana di Venezia [Study for an Operational Urban History of Venice] (Instituto Poligrafico dello Stato, Rome)
44.
MuratoriSBollatiRBollatiSMarinucciG, 1963Studi per una Operante Storia Urbana di Roma [Study for an Operational Urban History of Rome] (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome)
45.
OliveiraP, 1992, “Evolução da cartografia urbana oitocentista do Porto, enquadrada na cartografia urbana de Portugal e da Europa” [The evolution of the 18th-century urban cartography of Oporto, framed by the urban cartography of Portugal and Europe], in Uma Cartografia Exemplar. O Porto em 1892 (AHCMP, Oporto) pp 17–28
46.
OliveiraVPinhoP, 2006, “The study of urban form in Portugal: A comparative analysis of the cities of Lisbon and Oporto”Urban Design International11187–201
47.
OliveiraVPinhoP, 2008, “Urban form and municipal planning in Lisbon and Oporto: 1965–2005”Planning Perspectives3381–105
48.
PoëteM, 1924Une Vie de Cité. Paris, de sa Naissance à nos Jours [The life of the city. Paris, from its birth to our times] (Picard, Paris)
49.
SchlütterI, 1899, “Über den Grundriß der Städte” [On the layout of towns]Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin34446–462
50.
SteadmanP, 1983Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans (Pion, London)
51.
SteadmanP, 2004, “Developments in space syntax”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31483–486
52.
SteadmanPBrownFRickabyP, 1991, “Studies in the morphology of the English building stock”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1885–98
53.
SternbergE, 2000, “An integrative theory of urban design”Journal of the American Planning Association66265–278
54.
TalenEEllisC, 2002, “Beyond relativism. Reclaiming the search for good city form”Journal of Planning Education and Research2236–49
55.
TavaresR, 1992, “A carta topografica da Cidade do Porto de 1892—uma base cartográfica para agestao urbanistica municipal” [The 1892 topographical plan of Oporto city—a cartographical support for municipal development control”, in Uma Cartografia Exemplar. O Porto em 1892 (AHCMP, Oporto) pp 29–42
56.
WhitehandJ, 1992, “Recent advances in urban morphology”Urban Studies29619–636
57.
WhitehandJ, 2001, “British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition”Urban Morphology5103–109
58.
WhitehandJLarkhamP, 1992, “The urban landscape: Issues and perspectives”, in Urban Landscapes: International Perspectives Eds WhitehandJLarkhamP (Routledge, London) pp 1–19
59.
WhitehandJMortonN, 2003, “Fringe belts and the recycling of urban land: An academic concept and planning practice”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30819–839
60.
WhitehandJMortonN, 2004, “Urban morphology and planning: The case of fringe belts”Cities21275–289
61.
WhitehandJMortonN, 2006, “The fringe-belt phenomenon and socioeconomic change”Urban Studies432047–2066
