Significant advances in public participation geographic information systems technology and online mapping platforms have not translated into enhanced citizen participation in democratic planning processes. This study contributes to addressing this gap by evaluating the engagement of members of an urban community in sustainable neighbourhood planning through argumentation mapping. The study provided an online public discussion forum, together with a neighbourhood map to which the participants could link their discussion contributions. On the basis of participation statistics, contents of contributions, and responses to a survey, we discuss the participants' technical and engagement experiences. The sixteen registered participants lived within or near the ‘Queen West Triangle’ in downtown Toronto, Canada. They rated themselves as experienced computer users and consequently found the participation in the online discussion forum to be easy. The contributions showed a great degree of interest and knowledge in the issues of sustainable community development. However, while the majority of participants also rated themselves as comfortable with map reading, they found the handling of the online neighbourhood map difficult and did not use the option to link their comments to the map.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarverS, 2001, “Public participation using web-based GIS”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28803–804
2.
CarverSPeckhamR, 1999, “Using GIS on the Internet for planning”, in Geographical Information and Planning Ed. StillwellJ (Springer, New York) pp 371–390
3.
CarverSEvansAKingstonRTurtonI, 2001, “Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28907–921
4.
CraigW J, 1998, “The Internet aids community participation in the planning process”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems22393–404
5.
CraigW JHarrisT MWeinerD, 2002Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (Taylor and Francis, London)
6.
DenshamP J, 1991, “Spatial decision support systems”, in Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications Eds MaguireD JGoodchildM FRhindD W (Longman, London) pp 403–412
7.
DragicevicSBalramS, 2004, “A web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processes”Journal of Geographical Systems6133–153
8.
HaklayM, 2003, “Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach”International Journal of Geographical Information Science17577–592
9.
HoritaM, 2000, “Mapping policy discourse with CRANES: Spatial understanding support systems as a medium for community conflict resolution”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27801–814
10.
JankowskiPNyergesT, 2003, “Towards a framework for research on geographic information-supported participatory decision-making”URISA Journal15(APA 1) 9–17
11.
KeenanP, 1997, “Using a GIS as a DSS generator”, WP MIS 95–9, University College Dublin
KeßlerCRinnerCRaubalM2005, “An argumentation map prototype to support decision-making in spatial planning”, in Proceedings of AGILE 2005–8th Conference on Geographic Information Science Eds ToppenFPainhoM, 26–28 May, Estoril (IEEE Press, New York) pp 135–142
14.
KingstonRCarverSEvansATurtonI, 2000, “Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision making”Computers, Environment and Urban Studies24109–125
15.
LeahyMHallG BFindlayDNichollsTFeickR, 2006, “Implementation of synchronous, spatially-referenced discussion between multiple users with open-source web GIS and database tools”, paper presented at FOSS4G2006 – Free and Open Source Software for Geoinformatics, 11–15 September, Lausanne, http://www.foss4g2006.org
16.
NilesSHansonS, 2001, “A new era of accessibility: Or is it?”Workshop on Access to Geographic Information and Participatory Approaches Using Geographic InformationSpoleto, Italy, 6–8 December, http://www.spatial.maine.edu/∼onsrud/Spoleto/NilesHanson.pdf
PengZ, 2001, “Internet GIS for public participation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28889–905
19.
PicklesJ, 1995, “Representations in an electronic age”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ (Guilford Press, New York) pp 1–30
20.
RamasubramanianL, 2000Knowledge Production and Use in Community-based Organizations: Examining the Impacts and Influence of Information Technologies PhD thesis, Department of Architecture and Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
21.
RamasubramanianLQuirinA, 2004, “Participatory GIScience: Progress or illusion”, paper presented at the URISA Public Participation GIS Conference, 18–20 July, Madison, WI, http://www.urisa.org/prev/PPGIS/2004/Prelim/absMonday.htm
22.
RinnerC, 2001, “Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28847–863
23.
RinnerC, 2005, “Computer support for discussions in spatial planning”, in GIS for Sustainable Development Ed. CampagnaM (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) pp 167–180
24.
RinnerC, 2006, “Argumentation mapping in collaborative spatial decision making”, in Collaborative GIS Eds DragicevicSBalramS (Idea Group, Hershey, PA) pp 85–102
25.
SidlarCRinnerC, 2007, “Analyzing the usability of an argumentation map as a participatory spatial decision support tool”URISA Journal19(1) 47–55
26.
SidlarCRinnerC, 2008, “Utility assessment of a map-based online geo-collaborative tool”Journal of Environmental Management forthcoming
27.
SieberR E, 2004, “Rewiring for a GIS/2”Cartographica39(1) 25–39
28.
SieberR E, 2006, “Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96491–507
29.
SimonH, 1976Administrative Behavior3rd edition (The Free Press, New York)
30.
SteinmannRKrekABlaschkeT, 2004, “Analysis of online public participatory GIS applications with respect to the differences between the US and Europe”, in Proceedings of the 24th Urban Data Management Symposium 27–29 October, Chioggia, http://www.salzburgresearch.at/research/gfx/udms%20paper_2004_last.pdf
31.
SternP CFinebergV, (Eds), 1996Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society report by National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
32.
TangM Y, 2006, “Design and implementation of a GIS-enabled online discussion forum for participatory planning”, MScE thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering; TR244, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick
33.
TangTColemanD J, 2005, “Design of a GIS-based online discussion forum for participatory community planning”, in Proceedings of the 98th Annual Conference of the Canadian Institute of Geomatics 13–15 June, Ottawa (Canadian Institute of Geomatics, Ottawa) CD-ROM
34.
VossADenisovichIGatalskyPGavouchidisKKlotzARoederSVossH, 2004, “Evolution of a participatory GIS”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems28635–651
35.
ZhaoJColemanD J, 2006, “GeoDF: Towards a SDI-based PPGIS application for e-governance” in Proceedings of the GSDI-9 Conference 6–10 November, Santiago, http://www.gsdi9.cl/english/papers/TS9.3paper.pdf/
