A new methodology is presented that measures density in urban systems. By combining highly detailed height measurements with, amongst others, topographical data we are able to quantify urban volume. This new approach is demonstrated in two separate case studies that relate to the temporal and spatial dimension of the urban environment, respectively. In the first study the growth of the city of Amsterdam over the past century is studied. The urban-volume indicator is used to visualise and quantify the urban extension and intensification process. To critically analyse the spatiotemporal development of Amsterdam the self-organising-map approach is applied. Special attention is given to highlighting any signs of recent polynuclear development. The second case study compares the building-height frequency and spatial distribution of high-density zones in the four major Dutch cities. Additionally, the presence of built-up areas and the actual urban-volume values are explained simultaneously using a Heckman selection model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnasAArnottRSmallK A, 1998, “Urban spatial structure”Journal of Economic Literature361426–1464
2.
BacaoFLoboVPainhoM, 2005, “The self-organizing map, the Geo-SOM, and relevant variants for geosciences”Computers and Geosciences31155–163
3.
BattenD F, 1995, “Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century”Urban Studies32313–327
4.
BattyM, 2000, “The new urban geography of the third dimension”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27483–484
BattyMBesussiEMaatKHartsJ J, 2004, “Representing multifunctional cities: Density and diversity in space and time”Built Environment30324–337
7.
PontBerghauser MHauptP, 2007, “The relation between urban form and density”Urban Morphology1162–66
8.
BontjeMBurdackJ, 2005, “Edge cities, European-style: Examples from Paris and the Randstad”Cities22317–330
9.
BorzacchielloM TNijkampPKoomenE, 2007, “Accessibility and urban development: A grid-based comparative statistical analysis of Dutch cities, Research Memorandum 2007–15, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
10.
CBS, 2005, “StatLine, the central database of Statistics Netherlands”, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS), http://www.statline.nl
11.
DielemanF MFaludiA, 1998, “Randstad, Rhine-Ruhr and Flemish diamond as one polynucleated macro-region?”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie89320–327
EEA, 2006, “Urban sprawl in Europe; the ignored challenge”, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
14.
FerreroJ C, 2004, “The statistical distribution of money and the rate of money transference”Physica A341575–585
15.
Fisher-GewirtzmanDBurtMTzamirY, 2003, “A 3-D visual method for comparative evaluation of dense built-up environments”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30575–587
16.
FrenkelA, 2004, “Spatial distribution of high-rise buildings within urban areas; the case of the Tel Aviv metropolitan region”, paper presented at the 44th congress of the European Regional Science Association, Oporto, http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa04/PDF/171.pdf
17.
GarreauJ, 1991Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York)
18.
GaschetF, 2002, “The new intra-urban dynamics: Suburbanisation and functional specialisation in French cities”Papers in Regional Science8163–82
19.
HeckmanJ J, 1979, “Sample selection bias as a specification error”Econometrica47153–161
20.
HoltierSSteadmanJ PSmithM G, 2000, “Three-dimensional representation of urban built form in a GIS”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2751–72
21.
HuisingE JPereiraGomes L M, 1998, “Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications”ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetery and Remote Sensing53245–307
22.
KahnDVan der PlasG, 1999, “Amsterdam; city profile”Cities16371–381
23.
KaufholzR P, 2004, “Building densities; a physical volume approach”, MSc thesis, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
24.
KlerksJ, 2002, “Dutch mountains: Thema hoogbouwbeleid in de ruimtelijke context”ROM: Maandblad voor Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling2016–23
25.
KloosMDe MaarB, 1995, “The hesitant high-rise of Amsterdam”, in Amsterdam's High-rise: Considerations, Problems and Realizations Ed. KloosaM (Architecture and Natura Press, Amsterdam) pp 47–103
26.
KnolW CKramerHVan DorlandG JGijsbertseH, 2003, “Historisch grondgebruik van Nederland: Tijdreeksen grondgebruik Noord-Holland van 1850 tot 1980” [Historic land use of the Netherlands: Land use time series Noord-Holland from 1850–1980], Alterra Report Number 751, Alterra, Wageningen
KoomenEKaufholzRRietveldPScholtenH, 2004, “3D-GIS and urban volume: Applying the third dimension in a morphological study of the Amsterdam urban landscape”, in AGILE 2004 Conference Proceedings Eds ToppenFPrastocosP (Crete University Press, Heraklion) pp 139–147
29.
KoomenEDekkersJVan DijkT, 2008, “Open space preservation in the Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects”Land Use Policy25361–377
30.
KorverWJansenG R MBovyP H L, 1993, “The Netherlands: Ground transport below sea-level”, in A Billion Trips a Day: Tradition and Transition in European Travel Patterns Eds SalomonIBovyP H LOrfeuilJ P (Kluwer, Amsterdam) pp 329–348
31.
LambooyJ G, 1998, “Polynucleation and economic development: The Randstad”European Planning Studies6457–466
LongleyP AMesevV, 2002, “Measurement of density gradients and space-filling in urban systems”Papers in Regional Science811–28
34.
MaatKHartsJ J, 2001, “Implications of urban development for travel demand in the Netherlands”Transport Research Recordnumber 1780, 9–16
35.
MaatKHartsJ Jvan EmmichovenZeijlmans MGoetgelukR, 2005Dynamiek van Stedelijke Milieus 1996–2002 VROM 5068, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Den Haag
36.
Martori i CañasJ CSuriñach i CaraltJ, 2002, “Urban population density functions: The case of the Barcelona region, Documents de Recerca, Universitat de Vic
37.
OrfeuilJ-PBovyP H L, 1993, “European mobility is different; a global perspective”, in A Billion Trips a Day: Tradition and Transition in European Travel Pattersn Eds SalomonLBovyP H LOrfeuilJ P (Kluwer, Amsterdam) pp 13–19
38.
ElberinkOude SBrandGBrügelmannR, 2003, “Quality improvement of laser altimetry DEMs”, in Proceedings of the ISPRS Working Group III/3 Workshop ‘3-D Reconstruction from Airborne Laserscanner and In SAR data’, Dresden, Germany, 8–10 October Eds MaasH-GVosselmanGStreileinAInternational Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensoring and Spatial Information Service43
39.
PriemusH, 2001, “Corridors in The Netherlands: Apple of discord in spatial planning”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie9299–107
40.
RietveldPBruinsmaF R, 1998Is Transport Infrastructure Effective? (Springer, Berlin)
41.
RiguelleFThomasIVerhetselA, 2007, “Measuring urban polycentrism: A European case study and its implications”Journal of Economic Geography7193–215
42.
van EckRitsema JVan OoortFRaspeODaalhuizenFVan BrusselJ, 2006Vele Steden Maken Nog Green Radstad [Many cities do not make Ranstad] (NAi Publishers, Rotterdam)
43.
SternM AMarshW M, 1997, “The decentered city: Edge cities and the expanding metropolis”Landscape and Urban Planning36243–246
44.
SusebeekM, 2005, “De kern van hoogbouw” [Amsterdam, buildings of the city], Thesis, Hogeschool Utrecht, http://www.skyscrapers.com
45.
TDN, 1998Productbeschrijving top 10vector (Topografische Dienst Nederland, Emmen)
46.
Van der BurgAVan OortF G, 2001, “Stedelijke netwerken en de Vijfde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening”, in Stedelijke Netwerken: Theoretische en Empirische Reflecties Eds BoekemaFKuijpersE (Shaker, Maastrict) pp 5–18
47.
Van der CammenHGroenewegRVan de HoefG, 1988, “Randstad Holland: Growth and planning of a ring of cities”, in Four Metropolises in Western Europe, Development and Urban Planning of London, Paris, Randstad Holland and the Ruhr Region (van Gorcum, Assen) pp 117–176
48.
Van der HeidenNWallaghG, 1991, “How the Republic of Amsterdam got the Kingdom of the Netherlands to play its game”Built Environment1734–52
49.
Van der LaanL, 1998, “Changing urban systems, an empirical analysis at two spatial levels”Regional Studies32235–247
50.
VerburgP HVanEckRitsema J RDe NijsT C MDijstM JSchotP, 2004, “Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31125–150
51.
VesantoJAlhoniemiE, 2000, “Clustering of the selforganizing map”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks11586–600
52.
Victoria-FeserM-P, 2000, “Robust methods for the analysis of income distribution, inequality and poverty”International Statistical Review68277–293
53.
VosselmanGMaasH-G, 2001, “Adjustment and filtering of raw laser altimetry data”, in Proceedings of OEEPE Workshop on Airborne Laserscanning and Interferometric SAR for Detailed Digital Elevation Models, Stockholm 1–3 March Ed. TorlegardK, European Organisation for Experimental Photogrammetric Research, CD-ROM OEEPE number 40
54.
YooCJungK-SKimT-W, 2005, “Rainfall frequency analysis using a mixed Gamma distribution: Evaluation of the global warming effect on daily rainfall”Hydrological Processes193851–3861
55.
YueS, 2001, “A bivariate gamma distribution for use in multivariate flood frequency analysis”Hydrological Processes151033–1045
