Urban densification has been presented as a general recipe to reduce travelling. The size of settlements was not considered particularly relevant in this proposal. Two arguments are presented that challenge the notion that densification of large cities leads to less travelling. The first is related to the internal dynamics of compact areas in large cities; the second to the dynamics between central and peripheral areas. It is shown that the densification of large cities leads to either more travelling because of the wide range of available opportunities provided by agglomeration effects, or more time spent on travelling due to congestion. The conclusion is that it is counterproductive for transport planning to endorse approaches that compact the urban form of large cities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAMasseyDThriftN, 2003Decentering the Nation: A Radical Approach to Regional Inequality (Catalyst, London)
2.
AscherF, 1995Metapolis ou l'avenir des Villes (Odile Jacob, Paris)
3.
BaudrillardJ, 1998The Consumer Society (Sage, London)
BaumanZ, 2007Liquid Life (Policy Press, Cambridge)
6.
BergmannSSagerT, 2008, “In between standstill and hypermobility: introductory remarks to a broader discourse”, in The Ethnics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment Eds BergmannSSagerT (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–9
7.
BerryB, 1959, “Further comments concerning ‘geographic’ and ‘economic’ economic geography”The Professional Geographer1111–12
8.
BPR, 1964Traffic Assignment ManualBureau of Public Roads, Urban Planning Division, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC, http://www.commerce.gov/contact-US
9.
BrehenyM, 1992, “The contradictions of the compact city: a review”, in Sustainable Development and Urban Form Ed. BrehenyM (Pion, London) pp 138–159
10.
BrehenyM, 1995, “The compact city and transport energy consumption”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2081–101
11.
BrehenyM, 1996, “Centrists, decentrists and compromisers: views on the future of urban form”, in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? Eds JenksMBurtonEWilliamsK (Spon, Oxford) pp 13–35
12.
BurtonE, 2000, “The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis”Urban Studies371969–2001
13.
CamagniRGibelliMRigamontiP, 2002, “Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion”Ecological Economics40199–216
14.
CassNElizabethSJohnU, 2005, “Social exclusion, mobility and access”The Sociological Review53539–555
CerveroR, 1989, “The jobs — housing balance and regional mobility”Journal of the American Planning Association55136–150
17.
CerveroR, 1996, “Jobs — housing balance revisited: trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area”Journal of the American Planning Association62492–511
18.
CerveroRDuncanM, 2006, “Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs — housing balance or retail — housing mixing?”Journal of the American Planning Association72475–490
19.
CresswellT, 1996In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
20.
CresswellT, 2008, “Understanding mobility holistically: the case of hurricane Katrina”, in The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment Eds BergmannSSagerT (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 129–140
21.
CresswellTUtengT, 2008, “Gendered mobilities: towards an holistic understanding”, in Gendered Mobilities Eds UtengT PCresswellT (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–12
22.
DantzigGSaatyT, 1973Compact City: A Plan for a Liveable Urban Environment (W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA)
23.
DfT, 2004The Future of Transport: A Network for 2030Department for Transport (The Stationery Office, London)
24.
FerreiraABateyP, 2007, “Re-thinking accessibility planning: a multi-layer conceptual framework and its policy implications”Town Planning Review78429–458
25.
Freudendal-PedersenM, 2009Mobility in Daily Life: Between Freedom and Unfreedom (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey)
26.
GehlJ, 1971Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space5th edition (The Danish Architectural Press, Copenhagen)
27.
GiulianoG, 1991, “Is jobs — housing balance a transportation issue?”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1305305–312
28.
GordonPRichardsonH, 1989, “Gasoline consumption and cities: a reply”Journal of the American Planning Association55342–346
29.
GordonPRichardsonH, 1997, “Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association6395–106
30.
HägerstrandT, 1970, “What about people in regional science?”Regional Science Association Papers246–21
31.
HallP, 1997, “The future of the metropolis and its form”Regional Studies31211–220
32.
HansonS, 2006, “Imagine”Journal of Transport Geography14232–233
33.
JanelleD, 1968, “Central place development in a time — space framework”The Professional Geographer205–10
34.
JanelleD, 1969, “Spatial reorganization: a model and concept”Annals of the Association of American Geographers59348–364
35.
JenksMBurtonEWilliamsK, 1996The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (Spon, Oxford)
36.
KenworthyJLaubeF, 1999, “Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy”Transportation Research A33691–723
37.
KenyonS, 2003, “Understanding social exclusion and social inclusion”Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers156(ME2) 97–104
38.
KraanM, 1998, “In search limits to mobility growth with a model for the allocation of time and money”, in Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modelling Eds GarlingTLaitilaTWestinK (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 89–116
39.
LevineJ, 1998, “Rethinking accessibility and jobs — housing balance”Journal of the American Planning Association64133–149
40.
LevinsonDKanchiS, 2002, “Road capacity and the allocation of time”Journal of Transportation and Statistics5125–46
41.
LevinsonDKumarA, 1994, “The rational locator: why travel times have remained stable”Journal of the American Planning Association60319–332
42.
LevinsonDKumarA, 1997, “Density and the journey to work”Growth and Change28147–172
43.
LevinsonDWuY, 2005, “The rational locator reexamined: are travel times still stable?”Transportation32187–202
44.
LucasK, 2006, “Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK”Transportation Research Part A40801–809
45.
LukermannF, 1961, “The role of theory in geographical inquiry”The Professional Geographer13(2) 1–6
46.
MaatKvan WeeBSteadD, 2005, “Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3233–46
47.
MokhtarianPSalomonI, 2001, “How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations”Transportation Research Part A35695–719
48.
MokhtarianPSalomonIRedmondL, 2001, “Understanding the demand for travel: it's not purely ‘derived’”Innovation14355–380
49.
NewmanPKenworthyJ, 1989, “Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of US cities with a global survey”Journal of the American Planning Association5524–37
50.
OrtúzarJWillumsenL, 2001Modelling Transport (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
51.
PengZ, 1997, “The jobs — housing balance and urban commuting”Urban Studies341215–1235
52.
PriemusHNijkampPBanisterD, 2001, “Mobility and spatial dynamics: an uneasy relationship”Journal of Transport Geography9167–171
53.
SakodaJ, 1971, “The checkerboard model of social interaction”Journal of Mathematical Sociology1119–132
54.
SantosBAntunesA, 2005, “Evaluating the implications of urban development strategies upon the performance of transportation networks with TRANSPLAN”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management 2005 (CUPUM 05)http://128.40.111.250/cupum/searchpapers/detail.asp?plD=281
55.
SchellingT, 1969, “Models of segregation”American Economic Review59488–493
56.
SchellingT, 1971, “Dynamic models of segregation”Journal of Mathematical Sociology1143–186
57.
SchwanenTDielemanFDijstM, 2004a, “The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach”Growth and Change35304–333
58.
SchwanenTDijstMDielemanF, 2004b, “Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience”Urban Studies41579–603
59.
SchwanenTKwanM PRenF, 2008, “How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space — time constraints and geographies of everyday activities”Geoforum392109–2121
60.
StewartJ, 1941, “An inverse distance variation for certain social influences”Science9389–90
61.
StewartJ, 1942, “A measure of the influence of a population at a distance”Sociometry563–71
62.
StewartJ, 1947, “Empirical mathematical rules concerning the distribution and equilibrium of population”Geographical Review37461–485
63.
StopherP, 2004, “Reducing road congestion: a reality check”Transport Policy11117–131
64.
TalvitieA, 1997, “Things planners believe in, and things they deny”Transportation241–31
65.
WeberJ, 2003, “Individual accessibility and distance from major employment centers: an examination using space — time measures”Journal of Geographical Systems551–70
66.
WilliamsKBurtonEJenksM, 1996, “Achieving the compact city through intensification: an acceptable option?”, in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? Eds WilliamsKBurtonEJenksM (Spon, Oxford) pp 83–96
