Public participation is an important part of the urban planning process. However, too often the goals of this participation are not clearly articulated and, as a result, the platforms for participation created with digital technologies are often poorly designed or simply lack clarity. Immersive planning is a conceptual model with which to conceive the process of public participation that focuses on the depth and breadth of user experience. Borrowing from literature on games and virtual environments, we frame recent, technologically aided approaches to public participation within three categories of immersion: challenge-based, sensory, and imaginative. Geographic information systems, computer aided design, planning support systems, virtual environments, and digital games are all methods of obtaining user immersion in one or a combination of these categories. In this paper we provide a review of the foundational literature and influential projects in this area, and by framing them within the model of immersive planning seek to connect these efforts to provide a clearer path forward in employing new technologies for public participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-KodmanyK, 2000, “Public participation: technology and democracy”Journal of Architectural Education53220–228
2.
AppletonKLovettA, 2005, “GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: reactions from planning and related professionals”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems29386–395
3.
ArnsteinS, 1969, “A ladder of citizen participation”Journal of the American Planning Association35216–224
4.
BarndtM, 1998, “Public participation GIS—barriers to implementation”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 105–112
5.
BrodyS DGodschalkD RBurbyR J, 2003, “Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices”Journal of the American Planning Association6986–95
6.
BurkeE M, 1979A Participatory Approach to Urban Planning (Human Sciences Press, New York)
7.
CarverS, 2001, “Public participation using web-based GIS”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28803–804
8.
CarverS, 2003, “The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st century”Urban and Regional Information Systems Association Journal15(APA I) 29–33
9.
CarverSEvansAKingstonRTurtonI, 2001, “Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28907–921
10.
ClavelP, 1986The Progressive City: Planning and Participation 1969–1984 (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
11.
CorbettJWadeK, 2005, “Player perspective: using computer game engines for 3D cartography”Cartographia40(3) 113–120
12.
DourishPBellG, 2007, “The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34414–430
13.
DryzekJ S, 1990Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
14.
ElwoodSLeitnerH, 1998, “GIS and community-based planning: exploring the diversity of neighborhood perspectives and needs”Cartography and Geographic Information Science25(2) 77–88
15.
ErmiLMäyräF, 2005, “Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion”, in Proceedings of the 2005 DiGRA Conference: Changing Views—World in Play 16–20 June, Vancouver, BC, http://www.digra.org/dl/db/06276.41516.pdf
16.
ForesterJ, 1988Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
17.
FothMBajracharyaBBrownRHearnG, 2009, “The second life of urban planning? Using neogeography tools for community engagement”Journal of Location Based Services397–117
18.
GeeJ P, 2007What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy (Palgrave, New York)
19.
GeertmanS, 2002, “Participatory planning and GIS: a PSS to bridge the gap”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2921–35
20.
GodschalkD EMillsW E, 1966, “A collaborative approach to planing through urban activities”Journal of the American Planning Association32(2) 86–95
21.
GordonEKooG, 2008, “Placeworlds: using virtual worlds to foster civic engagement”Space and Culture11204–221
22.
GordonEManosevitchE, 2010, “Augmented deliberation: merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning”New Media and Society12763–778
23.
GordonESchirraS, 2011, forthcoming, “Playing with empathy: digital role–playing games in public meetings”, in Proceedings of 5h International Conference on Communities of Technologies 29 June – 2 July, Brisbane
24.
HallP, 2000Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
25.
HamiltonATroddNZhangXFernandoTWatsonK, 2001, “Learning through visual systems to enhance the urban planning process”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28833–845
26.
HarderC, 1998Serving Maps on the Internet: Geographic Information on the World Wide Web (ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA)
27.
HarrisT MWeinerD, 1996, “GIS and society: the social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS”, scientific report for NCGIA Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting, 2–5 March, South Haven, MN, http://www.ncgia.ucsc.edu/Publications/Tech_Reports/96/96-.PDF
28.
HarrisTWeinerD, 1998, “Empowerment, marginalization and ‘community-integrated’ GIS”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 67–76
29.
HealeyP, 1996, “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23217–234
30.
HowardT L JGabortiN, 2007, “Using virtual environment technology to improve public participation in urban planning processes”Journal of Urban Planning and Development133233–241
31.
InnesJ EBooherD E, 1999, “Consensus building as roleplaying and bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning”Journal of the American Planning Association65(1) 9–26
32.
JacobsJ, 2002The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, New York)
33.
KeatesJ S, 1996Understanding Maps (Addison Wesley, New York)
34.
KingstonRCarverSEvansATurtonI, 2000, “Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems24109–125
35.
KlostermanR E, 1999, “New perspectives on planning support systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26317–320
36.
KraakM, 2004, “The role of the map in a Web-GIS environment”Journal of Geographical Systems683–93
37.
KrueckebergD A, 1983Introduction to Planning History in the United States (The Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ)
38.
KrumholzNClavelP, 1994Reinventing Cities: Equity Planners Tell Their Stories (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
39.
LeGatesRStoutF, 2003The City Reader (Routledge, New York)
40.
LennertzBLutzenheiserA, 2006The Charrette Handbook (APA Planners Press, Chicago, IL)
41.
LevyR M, 1995, “Visualization of urban alternatives”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22343–358
42.
MonmonierM, 1996How to Lie with Maps (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
43.
ObermeyerN, 1998, “The evolution of public participation GIS”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 65–66
44.
PengZ-R, 2001, “Internet GIS for public participation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28889–905
45.
PengZ-RTsouM-H, 2003Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Network (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ)
46.
PicklesJ, 1995Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems (Guilford Press, New York)
47.
PineBGilmoreJ H, 1999The Experience Economy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
48.
RhyneT-M, 2002, “Computer games and scientific visualization”Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery45(7) 40–44
49.
RinnerC, 2001, “Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28847–863
50.
RinnerCKeßlerCAndrulisS, 2008, “The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems32386–395
51.
SarjakoskiT, 1998, “Networked GIS for public participation—emphasis on utilizing image data”Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems22381–392
52.
SeiberR, 2006, “Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96491–507
53.
SmithSMarshTDukeDWrightP, 1998, “Drowning in immersion”, in Proceedings of UK-VRSIG'98: UK Virtual Reality Special Interest GroupExeter, Devon, http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/ukvrsig98/paplist1.htm
54.
SteinJ M, 2004Classic Readings in Urban Planning (APA Planners Press, Chicago, IL)
55.
TalenEShahS, 2007, “Neighborhood evaluation using GIS: an exploratory study”Environment and Behavior39583–615
56.
TomlinsonR, 1998, “The Canada geographic information system”, in The History of Geographic Information Systems Ed. ForesmanT W (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 21–32
57.
TowersG, 1995Building Democracy: Community Architecture in the Inner Cities (University College London Press, London)
58.
TurkleS, 1995Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet (Simon and Schuster, New York)
59.
WhyteW H, 1980The Social Life of Small Urban SpacesProject for Public Places, New York
60.
WyattE, 2002, “Redevelopment goes public: workshops produce ideas”The New York Times 9 June, page 41
61.
YeeNBailensonJ N, 2006, “Walk a mile in digital shoes: the impact of embodied perspective-taking on the reduction of negative stereotyping in immersive virtual environments”, in Proceedings of PRESENCE 2006: The 9th Annual International Workshop on Presence 24–26 August, Cleveland, OH, http://www.temple.edu/ispr/prev_conferences/proceedings/2006/Yee%20and%20Bailenson.pdf
62.
YoungI M, 2002Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
