In an effort to combat the complexity and uncertainty that comes with mega-infrastructure development, planners often seek to simplify the process and scope of their projects, making plans that consist of rigid sequential steps. The question is how this approach influences planners' responsiveness to uncertainty and complexity in megaproject decision making and planning. To answer this question I introduce two concepts: Adaptive capacity and strategic capacity. I develop these concepts and apply them to three large infrastructure projects in the Netherlands in order to analyze the potential of these projects to deal with change and inertia. In this paper I first look at the concepts individually and then link them together. This shows that, to be successful, planning needs to navigate a project through uncertainty and complexity and that it is important that these concepts are taken into consideration.
De BruijnHLeijtenM, 2007, “Megaprojects and contested information”Transportation Planning and Technology3049–69
10.
DeutschK W, 1966, The Nerves of Government. Models of Political Communication and Control2nd edition (Free Press, New York)
11.
DoversS RHandmerJ W, 1992, “Uncertainty, sustainability and change”Global Environmental Change2262–276
12.
DryzekJ S, 1987, “Complexity and rationality in public life”Political Studies35424–442
13.
Easterby-SmithM, 1997, “Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques”Human Relations501085–1113
14.
FaludiA, 1996, “Rationality, critical rationalism, and planning doctrine”, in Explorations in Planning Theory Eds MandelbaumS JMazzaLBurchellR W, (Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 65–82
15.
FaludiAMastopJ M, 1982, “The ‘IOR school’: The development of a planning methodology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design9241–256
16.
FriendJ KHicklingA, 1987Planning Under Pressure. The Strategic Choice Approach (Taylor and Francis, Oxford)
17.
FriendJ KJessopW N, 1976Local Government and Strategic Choice2nd edition (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
GiezenM, 2012aNavigating Mega Projects through Uncertainty and Complexity PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam
20.
GiezenM, 2012b, “Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning”International Journal of Project Management30781–790
21.
GregoryRFailingL, 2002, “Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: Water use planning in British Columbia, Canada”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21492–499
22.
GrimseyD, 2002, “Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects”International Journal of Project Management20107–118
23.
HagmannJChumaE, 2002, “Enhancing the adaptive capacity of the resource users in natural resource management”Agricultural Systems7323–39
24.
HealeyP, 1999, “Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places”Journal of Planning Education and Research19111–121
25.
InnesJ EBooherD E, 2010, Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (Routledge, London)
26.
KunzmannK R, 2000, “Strategic spatial development through information and communication”, in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning Eds SaletW G MFaludiA, (Royal Netherlands Society of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam) pp 259–266
27.
KvaleSBrinkmannS, 2009InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing2nd edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
28.
LambooyJ GBoschmaR A, 2001, “Evolutionary economics and regional policy.”Annals of Regional Science35113–131
29.
LandauM, 1969, “Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap”Public Administration Review29346–358
30.
LatourB, 2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
31.
LowBOstromESimonCWilsonJ, 2003, “Navigating social-ecological systems”, in Navigating Social-Ecological Systems Eds BerkesFColdingJFolkeC, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 53–82
32.
MarchauV AWalkerW Evan WeeG P, 2010, “Dynamic adaptive transport policies for handling deep uncertainty”Technological Forecasting and Social Change77940–950
33.
MillerRLessardD, 2001The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Risks, Institutions and Governance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
34.
MinerA SMeziasS J, 1996, “Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research”Organization Science788–99
35.
Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 1977Amrobel; Globale Verkenning van Tracés voor een Hoge Snelheidslijn AMsterdam-ROtterdam-BELgische GrensMinisterie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Den Haag
36.
NonakaI, 1994, “A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation”Organization Science514–37
37.
PriemusH, 2007, “Development and design of large infrastructure projects: Disregarded alternatives and issues of spatial planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34626–644
38.
PriemusH, 2010, “Mega-projects: Dealing with pitfalls”European Planning Studies181023–1039
39.
RommeA G Lvan WitteloostuijnA, 1999, “Circular organizing and triple loop learning”Journal of Organizational Change Management12439–454
40.
SaletW G MBertoliniLGiezenM, 2012, “Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects?”International Journal of Project Management in press
41.
SchindlerMEpplerM J, 2003, “Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors”International Journal of Project Management21219–228
42.
SimonH A, 1991, “Bounded rationality and organizational learning”Organization Science2125–134
43.
SimonsD JChabrisC F, 1999, “Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events”Perception281059–1074
44.
SongerADiekmannJPecsokR, 1997, “Risk analysis for revenue dependent infrastructure projects”Construction Management and Economics15377–382
45.
TeeceD JPisanoGShuenA, 1997, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”Strategic Management Journal18509–533
46.
ThomasJMengelT, 2008, “Preparing project managers to deal with complexity: Advanced project management education”International Journal of Project Management26304–315
47.
TU Delft, 2008Evaluatie RandstadRail Eindrapport, Het RandstadRail-project: Lightrail, Zware OpgaveTU Delft, Delft
48.
Van der HeijdenK, 1996Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
